Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Is The Black Bull a Scam?

SLINGOOREthereum
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Nov 2, 2026 · 1 audit on recordNew Launch · 3h old
SummaryAI Copilot

The Slingoor token is a standard ERC-20 implementation with additional custom logic for transfer restrictions.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • Liquidity < $50k
  • Top-10 concentration > 20%
  • Code: Non-Compliant Transfer Return Values
  • Code: Insecure Authorization via tx.origin
Exact factors
  • Liquidity < $50k ($17,164 across 1 pairs — thin market)
  • Top-10 concentration > 20% (41.4% total → 25.7% effective; 15.2% in EOAs, 26.2% in contracts)
  • Code: Non-Compliant Transfer Return Values (High, static analysis)
  • Code: Insecure Authorization via tx.origin (Medium, static analysis)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (3h old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.

Security Checklist

as of audit · Nov 26 of 7 checks passed
Contract verifiedVerified
OwnershipUnknown
MintNo mint
Liquidity lockLocked
UpgradeabilityFixed code
HoneypotNone found
Buy / sell tax0% / 0%

Holders

as of audit · Nov 2, 2026201 holders
26.2%Contracts15.2%Wallets58.6%Everyone else
26.2%Contracts15.2%Wallets58.6%Everyone else
ContractsWalletsEveryone elseBubble area = share of supply
41.4%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking26.2%
  • Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell15.2%
  • Everyone else191 holders58.6%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads25.7%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Nov 2, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Nov 2$17.2K

The risk score reads depth across every pair.

LP tokensLocked

The LP tokens of the analysed pool are locked or burned.

Analysed pool$17.2KShare of depth100.0%
LP Burned100.0% · ≈ permanent lock
LP Locked100.0% · Dead Address

Security Findings

1 High1 Medium6 Info
High

Non-Compliant Transfer Return Values

The _transfer, transfer, and transferFrom functions fail to correctly handle or return the expected boolean values required by the ERC-20 standard. This causes external contracts and automated market makers to incorrectly interpret the success or failure of token transfers.CD-01

Issue

The _transfer, transfer, and transferFrom functions fail to correctly handle or return the expected boolean values required by the ERC-20 standard. This causes external contracts and automated market makers to incorrectly interpret the success or failure of token transfers.

Fix

Ensure that all transfer functions explicitly return a boolean 'true' upon success and revert on failure, adhering strictly to the EIP-20 specification.

Status

Unresolved

Medium

Insecure Authorization via tx.origin

The returnTx function uses tx.origin to determine authorization rules. This is a security vulnerability because an attacker can trick a user into interacting with a malicious contract, which then calls returnTx, allowing the attacker to bypass intended access controls.CD-02

Issue

The returnTx function uses tx.origin to determine authorization rules. This is a security vulnerability because an attacker can trick a user into interacting with a malicious contract, which then calls returnTx, allowing the attacker to bypass intended access controls.

Fix

Replace tx.origin with msg.sender to ensure that the immediate caller is the entity being authorized, which is the standard practice for secure smart contract development.

Status

Unresolved

Info

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 41.4% of supply. What remains: 15.2% in wallets, 26.2% in other contracts. 201 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

The ten largest holders own 41.4% of supply. What remains: 15.2% in wallets, 26.2% in other contracts. 201 holders in total.

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Not listed by any independent source

201 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

201 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Liquidity burned — cannot be withdrawn

100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% of the LP tokens were sent to a burn address — that liquidity can never be withdrawn by anyone. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY

Issue

100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% of the LP tokens were sent to a burn address — that liquidity can never be withdrawn by anyone. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.

Fix

Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

The market for this token

Liquidity $17K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $56K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $17K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $56K (DexScreener, all pools).

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Project token

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $17K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $17K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.

Fix

Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Recently launched — less than a day of market history

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT

Issue

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.

Fix

Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Nov 2
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The Slingoor token is a standard ERC-20 implementation with additional custom logic for transfer restrictions. The audit identified critical flaws in the return value handling of transfer functions and insecure authorization patterns using tx.origin. While the core ERC-20 logic is standard, the custom transfer path introduces significant integration risks for decentralized exchanges and automated protocols.

Technical8/10Low risk

The architecture follows a standard ERC-20 pattern but fails to adhere to the EIP-20 specification regarding return values. 7.1 Architecture is simple, yet 7.2 Code Security is compromised by improper boolean handling in _transfer. 7.3 Access Control is weakened by the reliance on tx.origin in the returnTx function, which is susceptible to phishing-based authorization bypasses. 7.6 External integrations will likely fail due to the non-compliant return behavior.

Governance8/10Low risk

7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance controls are not present as the contract lacks administrative functions or complex economic parameters. The token operates as a simple asset without inflationary or deflationary mechanisms. 7.8 Operations are straightforward, though the lack of emergency pause functionality limits recovery options.

Upgrades8/10Low risk

7.7 Upgrades are not applicable as the contract is not a proxy and lacks upgradeability patterns. The code is immutable, meaning any identified vulnerabilities cannot be patched without deploying a new contract. This provides high transparency but zero flexibility for future security remediation.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

The development team should immediately refactor the transfer logic to ensure all functions return the correct boolean values as expected by the ERC-20 standard.

Furthermore, replace all instances of tx.origin with msg.sender to prevent unauthorized access and potential phishing attacks. Following these changes, the contract should undergo a comprehensive re-audit. Integration with external protocols should be avoided until the return value discrepancy is resolved to prevent loss of funds in automated liquidity pools.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
TypeToken
NetworkEthereum
Token age3h
Contract0xb891…2848
Deployer0xf2c8…8e5c
Badge for your website
The Black Bull security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Nov 2, 202650Medium

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the SLINGOOR contract address?

The The Black Bull (SLINGOOR) contract on Ethereum is 0xb8911085c5c9d10c1662c8477a31f5940a452848. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.

Is The Black Bull a scam?

Quantum Audit's risk score for The Black Bull is 50/100 (Medium risk) as of Nov 2, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Mint: No mint; Liquidity lock: Locked; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.

Is SLINGOOR liquidity locked?

Liquidity lock: Locked (as of Nov 2, 2026). Total DEX liquidity: $17.2K.

Who holds SLINGOOR?

As of Nov 2, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 41.4% of the supply across 201 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of The Black Bull?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified