The audited contract is a standard ERC-20 implementation utilizing the UUPS proxy pattern. Ownership has been permanently renounced, ensuring that no administrative functions can be triggered to alter contract logic or state. The codebase follows established OpenZeppelin standards, providing a robust foundation for token operations.
Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is Symbiotic a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The audited contract is a standard ERC-20 implementation utilizing the UUPS proxy pattern.
Read the full analysis- Upgradeable proxy — the admin can replace the logic
- 1 proxy upgrade(s) in the last 30 days
- LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
- Top-10 concentration > 50%
Exact factors
- Upgradeable proxy — the admin can replace the logic
- 1 proxy upgrade(s) in the last 30 days
- LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
- Top-10 concentration > 50% (80.7% total → 69.7% effective; 62.3% in EOAs, 18.4% in contracts)
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Nov 3Holders
as of audit · Nov 3, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking18.4%
- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell62.3%
- Everyone else100 holders19.3%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Nov 3, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Nov 3The risk score reads depth across every pair.
Whether the LP tokens are locked could not be determined.
Security Findings
InfoNo issues identified in the reviewed source
The verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (mint/owner authority, mint capability, holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.I-01
Issue
The verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (mint/owner authority, mint capability, holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.
Fix
Re-check after any contract upgrade or ownership change, both of which can alter behaviour without changing this page.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 80.7% of supply. What remains: 62.3% in wallets, 18.4% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 6.6%. 110 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 80.7% of supply. What remains: 62.3% in wallets, 18.4% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 6.6%. 110 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
110 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
110 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $122K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $179K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $122K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $179K (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: nobody (ownership renounced). Code: upgradeable proxy. Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $122K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: 2 days of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: nobody (ownership renounced). Code: upgradeable proxy. Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $122K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: 2 days of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — 2 days of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is 2 days old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is 2 days old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Nov 3The architecture leverages the UUPS proxy pattern, which is gas-efficient and well-documented. 7.1 Architecture is sound, utilizing standard OpenZeppelin libraries. 7.2 Code Security is high, with no identified vulnerabilities in the transfer path. 7.3 Access Control is effectively disabled due to ownership renouncement, preventing unauthorized administrative changes.
7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance risks are minimal as the contract lacks minting, burning, or fee-switching capabilities. The token functions as a standard utility asset. 7.6 External dependencies are limited to trusted OpenZeppelin implementations, reducing integration risk.
7.7 Upgrades are technically possible via the UUPS pattern, but the renounced ownership renders the upgrade mechanism dormant. 7.8 Operations are stable, as the contract state is immutable regarding administrative intervention. The implementation is correctly linked to the proxy, ensuring consistent behavior.
The contract is secure and follows best practices for immutable, upgradeable token deployments.
No further action is required as ownership has been renounced, effectively locking the current implementation and configuration.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Nov 3, 202664Medium
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Symbiotic?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified