New Launch · 2d old
Solana · Early Security Check · Jun 09, 2026

Is Son Goku a Scam? GOKU

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Contract buvuch…pump DexScreener ↗
Critical Risk
! Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (2d old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.
Volume 24h
$270.9K
Liquidity
$86.8K
Price
$0.001566
Token Age
2d
Top 10 Holders
0.0%

Critical Security Flags

2/5 checks passed
Contract VerifiedFail
Ownership RenouncedFail
No Mint FunctionPass
Liquidity LockedFail
Not a ProxyPass

Security Analysis

This report provides a metadata-driven security analysis of the Son Goku (GOKU) SPL Token Mint on Solana. The analysis is based on publicly available on-chain data and external market information, as source code for SPL Token Mints is not applicable. A critical finding indicates the mint account is reported as uninitialized, which fundamentally contradicts its reported trading activity and poses a significant risk. Other findings highlight a lack of transparency regarding total supply, decimals, and holder distribution, alongside risks associated with a very new liquidity pair.

The audit reveals a critical discrepancy where the Son Goku (GOKU) SPL Token Mint is reported as uninitialized despite having active trading and liquidity. This fundamental issue, combined with a lack of transparency regarding supply, decimals, and holder distribution, necessitates extreme caution. While the revocation of mint and freeze authorities is a positive security measure, the overall risk profile is significantly elevated due to the uninitialized state and other unknowns. It is strongly recommended that potential users and investors verify the true initialization status of the mint account directly on-chain and await full transparency on tokenomics before engaging. For projects seeking to establish trust and transparency, a Premium Deploy option would involve ensuring all on-chain metadata is correctly initialized and publicly verifiable, alongside comprehensive third-party se…

Audit Summary

This report provides a metadata-driven security analysis of the Son Goku (GOKU) SPL Token Mint on Solana. The analysis is based on publicly available on-chain data and external market information, as source code for SPL Token Mints is not applicable. A critical finding indicates the mint account is reported as uninitialized, which fundamentally contradicts its reported trading activity and poses a significant risk. Other findings highlight a lack of transparency regarding total supply, decimals, and holder distribution, alongside risks associated with a very new liquidity pair.

Final Recommendation: The audit reveals a critical discrepancy where the Son Goku (GOKU) SPL Token Mint is reported as uninitialized despite having active trading and liquidity. This fundamental issue, combined with a lack of transparency regarding supply, decimals, and holder distribution, necessitates extreme caution. While the revocation of mint and freeze authorities is a positive security measure, the overall risk profile is significantly elevated due to the uninitialized state and other unknowns. It is strongly recommended that potential users and investors verify the true initialization status of the mint account directly on-chain and await full transparency on tokenomics before engaging. For projects seeking to establish trust and transparency, a Premium Deploy option would involve ensuring all on-chain metadata is correctly initialized and publicly verifiable, alongside comprehensive third-party se…

Category Ratings

TechnicalHigh
6/10

The technical review reveals a critical issue: the SPL Token Mint account is reported as `Initialized: False`, which is highly contradictory to its observed market activity and suggests a fundamental problem with the token's state or data reporting (7.2 Code Security). Furthermore, essential de

GovernanceMedium
6/10

From an economic and governance perspective, the token benefits from the `Mint Authority` and `Freeze Authority` being `revoked`, which decentralizes control over token supply and account management (7.5 Governance). However, the `[UNKNOWN] holder concentration` prevents a full assessment of ownersh

UpgradesLow
6/10

As this audit focuses on an SPL Token Mint account, which is a data structure managed by the immutable SPL Token Program, direct upgradeability of the mint itself is not applicable (7.7 Upgrades). The underlying SPL Token Program is maintained and upgraded by Solana Labs, ensuring its long-term secu

Security Findings

5 total
1 Critical 1 High 2 Medium 1 Low
C-01CriticalUnresolved

Uninitialized SPL Token Mint Account

The provided on-chain data indicates the SPL Token Mint account `buvuchjfcjxfuycrmnwtm2w5ygtc7vv7mk4n22tgpump` is marked as `Initialized: False`. An uninitialized mint account cannot properly function as an SPL token, meaning it cannot have a valid supply, decimals, or be used for transfers and trading. The presence of reported liquidity and trading volume for an uninitialized mint is highly contradictory and suggests a severe data inconsistency or a potential misrepresentation of the asset's state.

Recommendation: Verify the true initialization status of the mint account directly on the Solana blockchain. If it is indeed uninitialized, any associated liquidity or trading activity is highly suspicious and users should exercise extreme caution. If it's a data error, ensure accurate data retrieval.
H-01HighUnresolved

Unknown Total Supply and Decimals

The total supply and decimal configuration for the Son Goku (GOKU) token are reported as `unknown`. This lack of transparency prevents users from accurately understanding the token's total market capitalization, inflation schedule (if any), and how token values are represented. It also makes it difficult to verify the token's economic model and potential for dilution.

Recommendation: Ensure that the token's total supply and decimals are publicly verifiable and accurately reported. For a legitimate SPL token, these values should be readily available via RPC calls to the Solana blockchain.
M-01MediumUnresolved

Lack of Holder Distribution Data

Information regarding the holder distribution for the Son Goku (GOKU) token is `unavailable`. Without this data, it is impossible to assess the level of centralization or decentralization of token ownership. High concentration of tokens in a few addresses can pose risks such as price manipulation or governance control by a small group.

Recommendation: Implement or integrate with tools that provide transparent holder distribution data. This allows potential investors to evaluate the distribution risk associated with the token.
M-02MediumUnresolved

Very New Liquidity Pair

The liquidity pair for Son Goku (GOKU) has an age of only `2 days`. New liquidity pairs are typically highly volatile and carry increased risk due to their short operational history. They are more susceptible to large price swings, rug pulls, or other manipulative activities before a stable market forms.

Recommendation: Investors should exercise increased caution when interacting with very new liquidity pairs. Monitor the pair's activity, liquidity depth, and trading volume over a longer period to assess its stability and legitimacy.
L-01LowUnresolved

Missing External Security Signals

External security signals from reputable services like GoPlus Solana data and RugCheck are `unavailable`. These services provide additional layers of due diligence by analyzing various on-chain metrics and known scam patterns. The absence of this data means a potential investor lacks these supplementary risk assessments.

Recommendation: While not a direct vulnerability, it is recommended to seek out and integrate with external security analysis tools to provide a more comprehensive risk profile for the token.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Son Goku a scam?

Based on the available data, Son Goku exhibits several characteristics commonly associated with high-risk projects. While we cannot definitively label it a scam, the unverified contract, unrenounced ownership, and unlocked liquidity are significant red flags often seen in projects that later fail or are abandoned, exposing investors to substantial risk.

Is Son Goku safe to buy?

No, Son Goku is not considered safe to buy based on the provided security data. The critical risk score of 74/100 is driven by key vulnerabilities. The unverified contract, non-renounced ownership, and unlocked liquidity collectively present a high risk profile, indicating significant potential for exploits or adverse actions by the project deployer.

Has Son Goku been audited?

The Son Goku contract is unverified, meaning its source code is not publicly available. For a security audit to be credible and verifiable, the contract code must be transparent. Therefore, it is highly unlikely that GOKU has undergone a proper, transparent security audit that investors can independently confirm.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Son Goku?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free, instant, no signup needed.

Get Detailed Audit
Run Full Audit →