Quantum Audit Logo

Is Son Goku a Scam?

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page →

Son Goku GOKU
BUvuCh…pump
Solana Not verifiedLast checked 3d ago 1 audit on record New Launch · 2d old
How is this score calculated? → Critical Risk
Executive SummaryAI Copilot

This audit of the Son Goku (GOKU) SPL token mint identifies a critical risk due to very low DEX liquidity, currently at $4,344. While mint and freeze authorities are revoked, preventing supply manipulation or account freezing, the low liquidity makes large position exits highly problematic. Holder distribution data was unavailable from chain-native RPC, preventing assessment of whale risk.

1 High
! Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (2d old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.
Volume 24h
$50.2600
Liquidity
$4.0K
Price
$0.000002718
Token Age
2d
Top 10 Holders
98.0%

Security Findings

High

Very Low Liquidity

H-01Total DEX liquidity is $4,344. Slippage will be severe; large positions cannot be exited without significant loss.
IssueTotal DEX liquidity is $4,344. Slippage will be severe; large positions cannot be exited without significant loss.
FixAccount for the fee in any swap calculation.
StatusUnresolved

Category Ratings

TechnicalMedium4/10

The Son Goku (GOKU) token is implemented using the spl-token-2022 program. Both the Mint Authority and Freeze Authority have been revoked, which prevents the creation of new tokens or the freezing of existing holder accounts. No Token-2022 extensions such as Transfer Hook or Default Account State Frozen are active. Furthermore, external security signals confirm that the token's balance and metadata are immutable, and there are no permanent delegate or non-transferable features.

GovernanceHigh1/10

The token exhibits very low liquidity, with total DEX liquidity at only $4,344. This indicates that large positions cannot be exited without significant price impact. The 24-hour volume to liquidity ratio is 0.70, which is considered normal and does not suggest wash trading. The DEX pair has been active for 34 days, providing some track record. Holder concentration data was unavailable from chain-native RPC.

UpgradesMedium4/10

The token's core parameters are fixed due to the revocation of both Mint and Freeze authorities. This means no new tokens can be minted and no accounts can be frozen. The token does not utilize any Token-2022 extensions that would introduce mutable or upgradable features, such as upgradable transfer fees or transfer hooks. Metadata is also immutable, ensuring the token's name, symbol, and image cannot be altered post-launch.

Security Checklist

Contract VerifiedFail
No Mint Function?
Liquidity LockedFail
Not a ProxyPass

Liquidity Depth

The risk score reads depth across every pair. The volume figure and the volume-to-liquidity ratio elsewhere on this page describe only the pair this audit analysed, so the two are not directly comparable.

What Raised This Score

  • Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
  • Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
  • Contract source NOT verified
  • Top-10 concentration > 70% (98.0% total → 98.0% effective; 98.0% in EOAs, 0.0% in contracts — extreme)
  • Liquidity NOT locked (owner can withdraw — rug-pull risk)
  • Liquidity < $10k ($3,974 across 1 pairs — easily drained)
  • Token age < 7 days (early, volatile)
  • 1 High finding(s) from audit

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Son Goku a scam?

Based on the available data, Son Goku exhibits several characteristics commonly associated with high-risk projects. While we cannot definitively label it a scam, the unverified contract, unrenounced ownership, and unlocked liquidity are significant red flags often seen in projects that later fail or are abandoned, exposing investors to substantial risk.

Is Son Goku safe to buy?

No, Son Goku is not considered safe to buy based on the provided security data. The critical risk score of 74/100 is driven by key vulnerabilities. The unverified contract, non-renounced ownership, and unlocked liquidity collectively present a high risk profile, indicating significant potential for exploits or adverse actions by the project deployer.

Has Son Goku been audited?

The Son Goku contract is unverified, meaning its source code is not publicly available. For a security audit to be credible and verifiable, the contract code must be transparent. Therefore, it is highly unlikely that GOKU has undergone a proper, transparent security audit that investors can independently confirm.

Related Audits

ttt (TTTT)Critical RiskSolstice (SLX)Critical RiskVibesterz (VSTR)Critical RiskSherbert The Tree (SHERBERT)Critical RiskWORLD BET (WBET)Critical RiskInfinex (INX)Critical Risk

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Son Goku?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit