Is Andes Virus (ANDV) Safe? Smart Contract Security Analysis

Security Findings

1 Info

Info

No code-level findings — an SPL mint exposes no auditable program source

I-01This token is an SPL token mint, not a deployed program: there is no contract source code on-chain for a line-by-line review, so no code-level vulnerability could be identified either way. The assessment on this page therefore rests on holder concentration, which are read directly from chain state and from third-party risk registries.

IssueThis token is an SPL token mint, not a deployed program: there is no contract source code on-chain for a line-by-line review, so no code-level vulnerability could be identified either way. The assessment on this page therefore rests on holder concentration, which are read directly from chain state and from third-party risk registries.

FixRead the risk score breakdown below as the substance of this audit. For a code-level review, the token would need an accompanying verified program.

StatusAcknowledged

Category Ratings

TechnicalMedium6/10

The Andes Virus (ANDV) token is implemented using the spl-token-2022 program, offering enhanced features. A key strength is the revocation of both the mint authority and freeze authority, ensuring no new tokens can be created and no holder accounts can be frozen. The token does not utilize a transfer hook, nor is the default account state frozen, simplifying transfer mechanics. Furthermore, external security signals confirm that balances are not mutable, and the token is not non-transferable, aligning with standard token functionality.

GovernanceHigh1/10

The token exhibits moderate liquidity with $12,082 in total DEX liquidity, which is sufficient for small trades without severe slippage. Trading activity shows a 24-hour volume of $327, resulting in a normal Volume/Liquidity Ratio of 0.03, indicating no signs of wash trading. The DEX pair has been active for 65 days, providing a reasonable track record. However, holder concentration data was unavailable, preventing an assessment of potential whale influence on price stability.

UpgradesMedium5/10

The token's immutability is a significant strength, as both the mint and freeze authorities have been revoked. This means the token supply is fixed and no accounts can be frozen post-launch. The metadata is also immutable, ensuring the token's name, symbol, and image cannot be changed. Additionally, the transfer fee and transfer hook functionalities are not present and are not upgradable, providing stability in its operational parameters.

Security Checklist

1/4 checks passed

Contract VerifiedFail

No Mint Function?

Liquidity LockedFail

Not a ProxyPass

Liquidity Depth

$10.0K

The risk score reads depth across every pair. The volume figure and the volume-to-liquidity ratio elsewhere on this page describe only the pair this audit analysed, so the two are not directly comparable.

What Raised This Score

7 factors

Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
Contract source NOT verified
Top-10 concentration > 70% (82.7% total → 82.7% effective; 82.7% in EOAs, 0.0% in contracts — extreme)
Liquidity NOT locked (owner can withdraw — rug-pull risk)
Liquidity < $10k ($9,966 across 1 pairs — easily drained)
Token age < 30 days (still settling)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Is Andes Virus Safe?