This Solana SPL Token Mint, "chicken shrimp (CS)", exhibits a robust security posture based on available on-chain facts. Both mint and freeze authorities are revoked, ensuring a fixed supply and preventing account freezing. No high-risk Token-2022 extensions like Transfer Hooks or permanent delegates are active, and metadata is immutable. Holder concentration data was unavailable for analysis, which limits the assessment of market manipulation risks.

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is chicken shrimp a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →This Solana SPL Token Mint, "chicken shrimp (CS)", exhibits a robust security posture based on available on-chain facts.
Read the full analysis- Top-10 concentration > 70%
- Liquidity < $50k
- Token age < 7 days
Exact factors
- Top-10 concentration > 70% (83.9% total → 83.9% effective; 83.9% in EOAs, 0.0% in contracts — extreme)
- Liquidity < $50k ($12,866 across 1 pairs — thin market)
- Token age < 7 days (early, volatile)
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Sep 22Holders
as of audit · Sep 22, 2026- Top 10 holdersthe ten largest balances83.9%
- Everyone elsethe rest of the supply16.1%
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Sep 22, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Sep 22The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are locked or burned.
Security Findings
InfoNo code-level findings — an SPL mint exposes no auditable program source
This token is an SPL token mint, not a deployed program: there is no contract source code on-chain for a line-by-line review, so no code-level vulnerability could be identified either way. The assessment on this page therefore rests on mint/owner authority, mint capability, LP lock/burn state, holder concentration, which are read directly from chain state and from third-party risk registries.I-01
Issue
This token is an SPL token mint, not a deployed program: there is no contract source code on-chain for a line-by-line review, so no code-level vulnerability could be identified either way. The assessment on this page therefore rests on mint/owner authority, mint capability, LP lock/burn state, holder concentration, which are read directly from chain state and from third-party risk registries.
Fix
Read the risk score breakdown below as the substance of this audit. For a code-level review, the token would need an accompanying verified program.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Sep 22The token is implemented using the spl-token-2022 program. Both the mint authority and freeze authority have been revoked, indicating a fixed supply and immutability of account freezing. No Transfer Hook is active, and the Default Account State Frozen extension is set to False, ensuring standard transfer behavior. The token's balance mutability is also disabled, preventing arbitrary balance adjustments. This configuration aligns with a secure, immutable token design.
The token currently has a liquidity of $26,407 with a 24-hour trading volume of $46,253. The volume-to-liquidity ratio is 1.75, which is within normal parameters and does not suggest wash trading. The DEX pair has been active for 23 days, providing some track record. Holder concentration data was unavailable for this assessment, preventing analysis of potential whale influence.
The token's mint and freeze authorities are both revoked, meaning no further tokens can be minted and no accounts can be frozen. The token utilizes the Token-2022 program but does not have a Transfer Hook or Default Account State Frozen extension enabled. Furthermore, the token's metadata is immutable, preventing changes to its name, symbol, or image post-launch. This configuration ensures the token's parameters are fixed.
Holders should periodically verify the on-chain status of the mint and freeze authorities to confirm they remain revoked.
While current liquidity is moderate, monitor DEX liquidity and trading volume for any significant changes that could impact trade execution. If holder distribution data becomes available in the future, review it to assess potential market manipulation risks from concentrated holdings.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Sep 22, 202630Low
- Sep 4, 202680High
- Jul 23, 202673High
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is chicken shrimp a scam?
Based on the provided data, CS exhibits high-risk characteristics, notably an unverified contract and unlocked liquidity, which are common traits in fraudulent schemes. While ownership is renounced and there's no mint function, these do not fully mitigate the 'rug pull' risk or the lack of transparency from the unverified code. The project is tagged with a High Risk score of 47/100, suggesting significant speculative danger rather than outright confirming it as a scam without further investigation.
Is chicken shrimp safe to buy?
No, chicken shrimp is not considered safe to buy based on the available security data. Key risk factors include an unverified contract, meaning its code cannot be transparently reviewed for exploits or malicious functions. Additionally, the liquidity is not locked, exposing investors to a potential 'rug pull' where liquidity can be withdrawn, crashing the token's value. The High Risk score of 47/100 underscores these significant vulnerabilities, indicating substantial speculative risk.
Has chicken shrimp been audited?
The chicken shrimp contract is explicitly noted as 'Contract verified: False.' This means the source code has not been published or confirmed on the blockchain. Without a verified contract, conducting a reliable and transparent security audit is extremely challenging, if not impossible, for independent parties. Therefore, there is no public assurance of a formal audit or code review, leaving investors reliant on unverified claims or facing significant transparency issues.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of chicken shrimp?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page