Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Is Puffpaw a Scam?

VAPEEthereum
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Nov 7, 2026 · 1 audit on recordNew Launch · 18h old
Chart
Medium RiskHow is this score calculated?
How the score breaks downratings: 10 is safest
Technical6/10Governance1/10Upgrades6/10Checks passed3 of 7Findings1 Critical · 1 High · 2 Medium · 5 Info9
SummaryAI Copilot

The contract at the provided address is not verified on Etherscan, preventing a direct security audit of the source code.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • Mint capability UNKNOWN
  • Liquidity not locked
  • Top-10 concentration > 30%
  • Contract source not verified — its logic cannot be read
Exact factors
  • Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
  • Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool; this pool is 100% of DEX liquidity) — who holds it cannot be verified
  • Top-10 concentration > 30% (100.0% total → 38.9% effective; 0.0% in EOAs, 97.2% in contracts; 2.8% burned, locked or in pools excluded)
  • Contract source NOT verified — its logic cannot be read

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (18h old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.

Security Checklist

as of audit · Nov 73 of 7 checks passed
Contract verifiedNot verified
OwnershipRetained
MintUnknown
Liquidity lockNot locked
UpgradeabilityFixed code
HoneypotNone found
Buy / sell tax0% / 0%

Holders

as of audit · Nov 7, 202648 holders
97.2%Contracts2.8%
97.2%Contracts
ContractsBurnedBubble area = share of supply
100.0%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking97.2%
  • Burnedout of circulation2.8%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads38.9%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Nov 7, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Nov 7$68.4K across 3 pairs

The risk score reads depth across every pair.

LP tokensNot locked

The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.

Analysed pool$68.2KShare of depth99.7%
Top-1 Unlocked Holder99.0%
Top-3 Unlocked100.0%
Unlocked LP held by
0x59d7…c7fb0xd45d…dc1c

Security Findings

1 Critical1 High2 Medium5 Info
Critical

Unverified Source Code

The contract source code is not published on the block explorer, making it impossible to audit for malicious functions or vulnerabilities.C-01

Issue

The contract source code is not published on the block explorer, making it impossible to audit for malicious functions or vulnerabilities.

Fix

Verify the contract source code on Etherscan immediately.

Status

Unresolved

High

Lack of Transparency

Investors cannot verify tokenomics, tax logic, or ownership privileges, leading to high risk of rug-pull or hidden backdoors.H-01

Issue

Investors cannot verify tokenomics, tax logic, or ownership privileges, leading to high risk of rug-pull or hidden backdoors.

Fix

Publish documentation and verified code to establish trust.

Status

Unresolved

Medium

Unverified Upgradeability

Without source code, it is impossible to confirm if the contract is immutable or if the owner can upgrade the logic at any time.M-01

Issue

Without source code, it is impossible to confirm if the contract is immutable or if the owner can upgrade the logic at any time.

Fix

Confirm if the contract is a proxy and disclose the implementation address.

Status

Unresolved

Medium

Liquidity not locked

0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 2 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a contract, 0x59d7…c7fb — holds 99.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY

Issue

0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 2 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a contract, 0x59d7…c7fb — holds 99.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.

Fix

Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 2.8% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 0.0% in wallets, 97.2% in other contracts. 48 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 2.8% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 0.0% in wallets, 97.2% in other contracts. 48 holders in total.

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Not listed by any independent source

48 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

48 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

The market for this token

Liquidity $68K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $52K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $68K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $52K (DexScreener, all pools).

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Project token

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: a 2-of-3 multisig. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $68K of DEX liquidity across 3 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: a 2-of-3 multisig. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $68K of DEX liquidity across 3 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.

Fix

Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Recently launched — less than a day of market history

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT

Issue

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.

Fix

Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Nov 7
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The contract at the provided address is not verified on Etherscan, preventing a direct security audit of the source code. The project utilizes a multisig ownership structure (2-of-3), which provides a layer of operational security but does not mitigate risks associated with hidden malicious logic or backdoors in the bytecode. Investors should exercise extreme caution as the lack of transparency prevents verification of tax mechanisms, minting capabilities, or liquidity safety.

Technical6/10Medium risk

7.1 Architecture and 7.2 Code Security cannot be assessed due to the lack of verified source code. 7.3 Access Control relies on a multisig, which is a positive signal compared to a single EOA. However, without code, we cannot verify if the owner has privileged functions like 'setTax' or 'blacklist'. 7.6 External dependencies and 7.8 Operations remain opaque.

Governance1/10High risk

7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance parameters are entirely hidden from the user. The 2-of-3 multisig provides a basic governance framework, but the lack of public documentation on tokenomics creates high economic uncertainty. There is no guarantee regarding supply caps or anti-dumping mechanisms.

Upgrades6/10Medium risk

7.7 Upgrades status is unknown as the contract is not verified. It is impossible to determine if the contract is a proxy or if it contains immutable logic. Users should assume the highest risk profile regarding potential logic changes.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

Do not interact with this contract until the source code is verified on a block explorer.

Verify the contract's logic for hidden 'honeypot' features, such as transfer restrictions or excessive tax functions, before committing any capital. Monitor the multisig owner address for suspicious activity. If the project claims to be legitimate, demand that the developers verify the source code on Etherscan to allow for a comprehensive security review.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
Type-
NetworkEthereum
Token age18h
Contract0x3861…55ae
Deployer0x0a08…79fc
Badge for your website
Puffpaw security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Nov 7, 202664Medium

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Related Audits

6 more on the recordAll audits
ChipEthereum64MediumEveripedia IQIQ · Ethereum63MediumEpic ChainEPIC · Ethereum65HighPRDCTRPRD · Ethereum62MediumZamaEthereum66HighSPACE IDID · Ethereum61Medium

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Puffpaw?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified