The BaseToken contract is a standard ERC-20 implementation with burnable capabilities. Ownership has been renounced, meaning no administrative functions can be executed, effectively locking the contract configuration. The codebase is clean and adheres to standard OpenZeppelin patterns.
Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is one life, its worth an attempt a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The BaseToken contract is a standard ERC-20 implementation with burnable capabilities.
Read the full analysis- Mint capability UNKNOWN
- Liquidity not locked
- Volume/Liquidity > 10×
- Contract source not verified — its logic cannot be read
Exact factors
- Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
- Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool) — withdrawable by the owner/deployer — rug-pull risk
- Volume/Liquidity > 10× (14.5× — possible wash trading)
- Contract source NOT verified — its logic cannot be read
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Oct 22Holders
as of audit · Oct 22, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking27.4%
- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell6.7%
- Everyone else1,359 holders65.9%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 22, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Oct 22The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.
0xd94b…a416A privileged address — the deployer, the owner, or the token contract itself — is among these holders, so that party can withdraw liquidity.
Security Findings
HighLiquidity withdrawable by the owner/deployer
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by the token's owner/deployer (0xd94b…a416) — they can pull that liquidity at any moment. This is the rug-pull path. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY
Issue
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by the token's owner/deployer (0xd94b…a416) — they can pull that liquidity at any moment. This is the rug-pull path. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.
Fix
Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNo code-level findings — contract source is not verified on the explorer
The contract's source code has not been published or verified on the block explorer, so only its deployed bytecode and on-chain behaviour were available. No source-level vulnerability could be confirmed or ruled out. The assessment on this page rests on mint/owner authority, holder concentration.I-01
Issue
The contract's source code has not been published or verified on the block explorer, so only its deployed bytecode and on-chain behaviour were available. No source-level vulnerability could be confirmed or ruled out. The assessment on this page rests on mint/owner authority, holder concentration.
Fix
Treat an unverified contract as unaudited at the code level. Ask the team to verify the source on the explorer, which makes an independent review possible.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 34.1% of supply. What remains: 6.7% in wallets, 27.4% in other contracts. 1,369 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 34.1% of supply. What remains: 6.7% in wallets, 27.4% in other contracts. 1,369 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
1,369 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
1,369 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $136K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $2.0M (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $136K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $2.0M (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: nobody (ownership renounced). Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $136K of DEX liquidity across 2 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: nobody (ownership renounced). Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $136K of DEX liquidity across 2 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — less than a day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 22The architecture follows the standard OpenZeppelin ERC-20 and ERC-20Burnable patterns, ensuring high compatibility with existing DeFi infrastructure. 7.1 Architecture is robust, utilizing well-audited libraries for token logic. 7.2 Code Security is high, with no identified vulnerabilities in the transfer path. 7.6 External dependencies are limited to standard, battle-tested libraries.
7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance risks are minimal as the contract is immutable and ownership is renounced. There are no minting or fee-on-transfer mechanisms that could be manipulated. The token supply is fixed or only reducible via burning, ensuring predictable economic behavior.
7.7 Upgrades are not supported as the contract is not a proxy. The code is immutable, eliminating risks associated with malicious logic updates. 7.8 Operations are simplified due to the lack of administrative control.
The contract is secure and requires no immediate action. Users should ensure they interact only with the verified contract address to avoid phishing risks.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Oct 22, 202684High
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the WORTH contract address?
The one life, its worth an attempt (WORTH) contract on Base is 0x6e520e5ea3ea6ad950dc349d8f1eb8d3f5de7968. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.
Is one life, its worth an attempt a scam?
Quantum Audit's risk score for one life, its worth an attempt is 84/100 (High risk) as of Oct 22, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Not verified; Ownership: Renounced; Liquidity lock: Not locked; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.
Is WORTH liquidity locked?
Liquidity lock: Not locked (as of Oct 22, 2026). Total DEX liquidity: $135.8K.
Who holds WORTH?
As of Oct 22, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 34.1% of the supply across 1,369 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of one life, its worth an attempt?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page