The contract at the provided address is not verified on the Base block explorer. As the source code is unavailable, it is impossible to perform a technical security audit. Investors should exercise extreme caution as unverified contracts may contain malicious functions such as honeypot mechanisms, hidden minting capabilities, or blacklists.
Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is one life, its worth an attempt a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The contract at the provided address is not verified on the Base block explorer.
Read the full analysis- Mint capability UNKNOWN
- Ownership status UNKNOWN
- Liquidity not locked
- Top-10 concentration > 30%
- Contract source not verified — its logic cannot be read
Exact factors
- Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
- Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
- Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool) — withdrawable by the owner/deployer — rug-pull risk
- Top-10 concentration > 30% (39.4% total → 30.8% effective; 25.1% in EOAs, 14.3% in contracts)
- Contract source NOT verified — its logic cannot be read
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Oct 24Holders
as of audit · Oct 24, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking14.3%
- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell25.1%
- Everyone else913 holders60.6%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 24, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Oct 24The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.
0x2ea3…e2d5A privileged address — the deployer, the owner, or the token contract itself — is among these holders, so that party can withdraw liquidity.
Security Findings
CriticalUnverified Source Code
The contract source code is not published on the block explorer. This prevents any security analysis and hides potential malicious logic.C-01
Issue
The contract source code is not published on the block explorer. This prevents any security analysis and hides potential malicious logic.
Fix
Verify the contract source code on the block explorer to allow for transparency and community review.
Status
Unresolved
HighLiquidity withdrawable by the owner/deployer
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by the token's owner/deployer (0x2ea3…e2d5) — they can pull that liquidity at any moment. This is the rug-pull path. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY
Issue
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by the token's owner/deployer (0x2ea3…e2d5) — they can pull that liquidity at any moment. This is the rug-pull path. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.
Fix
Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 39.4% of supply. What remains: 25.1% in wallets, 14.3% in other contracts. 923 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 39.4% of supply. What remains: 25.1% in wallets, 14.3% in other contracts. 923 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
923 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
923 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $141K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $1.3M (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $141K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $1.3M (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $141K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $141K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — less than a day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 247.1 Architecture: Unknown. 7.2 Code Security: Cannot be verified due to lack of source code. 7.3 Access Control: Cannot be verified. 7.6 External: Unknown dependencies.
7.4 Economic: Tokenomics and supply mechanics are opaque. 7.5 Governance: No insight into ownership or administrative privileges. 7.8 Operations: High risk of rug-pull or malicious tax implementation.
7.7 Upgrades: Cannot determine if the contract is immutable or utilizes a proxy pattern. Without source code, any potential upgradeability remains a hidden risk.
Do not interact with this contract. Without verified source code, there is no assurance that the contract functions as intended or that funds are secure.
Users should avoid providing liquidity or purchasing tokens associated with unverified addresses.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Oct 24, 202684High
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of one life, its worth an attempt?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page