Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Is one life, its worth an attempt a Scam?

WORTHBase
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Oct 23, 2026 · 1 audit on recordNew Launch · 10h old
SummaryAI Copilot

The contract at the provided address is not verified on the Base block explorer.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • Mint capability UNKNOWN
  • Ownership status UNKNOWN
  • LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
  • Top-10 concentration > 30%
  • Contract source not verified — its logic cannot be read
Exact factors
  • Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
  • Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
  • LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
  • Top-10 concentration > 30% (48.4% total → 48.4% effective; 48.4% in EOAs, 0.0% in contracts; deployer/owner holds 22.3%)
  • Contract source NOT verified — its logic cannot be read

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (10h old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.

Security Checklist

as of audit · Oct 233 of 7 checks passed
Contract verifiedNot verified
OwnershipUnknown
MintUnknown
Liquidity lockUnknown
UpgradeabilityFixed code
HoneypotNone found
Buy / sell tax0% / 0%

Holders

as of audit · Oct 23, 2026754 holders
48.4%Wallets51.6%Everyone else
48.4%Wallets51.6%Everyone else
WalletsEveryone elseBubble area = share of supply
48.4%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell48.4%
  • Everyone else744 holders51.6%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads48.4%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 23, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Oct 23$94.9K

The risk score reads depth across every pair.

LP tokensUnknown

Whether the LP tokens are locked could not be determined.

Analysed pool$94.9KShare of depth100.0%

Security Findings

1 Critical1 High4 Info
Critical

Unverified Source Code

The contract source code is not published on the block explorer, making it impossible to audit for vulnerabilities, backdoors, or malicious logic.C-01

Issue

The contract source code is not published on the block explorer, making it impossible to audit for vulnerabilities, backdoors, or malicious logic.

Fix

Publish and verify the source code on the block explorer to allow for community and security review.

Status

Unresolved

High

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 48.4% of supply. What remains: 48.4% in wallets, 0.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 22.3%. A holder that also controls the contract can sell into its own liquidity. 754 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

The ten largest holders own 48.4% of supply. What remains: 48.4% in wallets, 0.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 22.3%. A holder that also controls the contract can sell into its own liquidity. 754 holders in total.

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Not listed by any independent source

754 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

754 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

The market for this token

Liquidity $95K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $817K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $95K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $817K (DexScreener, all pools).

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Project token

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $95K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $95K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.

Fix

Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Recently launched — less than a day of market history

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT

Issue

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.

Fix

Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 23
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The contract at the provided address is not verified on the Base block explorer. Consequently, the source code is unavailable for security analysis. Investors should exercise extreme caution as the lack of transparency prevents verification of ownership, tax mechanisms, or potential backdoors.

Technical6/10Medium risk

7.1 Architecture: Unknown. 7.2 Code Security: Cannot be verified due to lack of source code. 7.3 Access Control: Cannot be verified. 7.6 External: Unknown dependencies.

Governance3/10High risk

7.4 Economic: Tokenomics and tax logic are hidden. 7.5 Governance: Administrative privileges are unknown. 7.8 Operations: Operational security is impossible to evaluate without code access.

Upgrades6/10Medium risk

7.7 Upgrades: It is unknown if the contract is upgradeable or contains proxy patterns. Without source code, hidden upgrade paths or logic changes cannot be ruled out.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

Do not interact with this contract until the source code is verified on the block explorer.

Perform thorough due diligence on the project team and verify the contract address through official, trusted channels before considering any capital allocation.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
Type-
NetworkBase
Token age10h
Contract0x1db2…bff6
Deployer0x964c…4119
Badge for your website
one life, its worth an attempt security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Oct 23, 202666High

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the WORTH contract address?

The one life, its worth an attempt (WORTH) contract on Base is 0x1db216807d8820b98d0237c075b8bf60f432bff6. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.

Is one life, its worth an attempt a scam?

Quantum Audit's risk score for one life, its worth an attempt is 66/100 (High risk) as of Oct 23, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Not verified; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.

Who holds WORTH?

As of Oct 23, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 48.4% of the supply across 754 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of one life, its worth an attempt?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page