The contract at the provided address is not verified on the Base block explorer. Consequently, the source code is unavailable for inspection, and no automated or manual security analysis could be performed. Investors should exercise extreme caution as unverified contracts often lack transparency regarding ownership, minting capabilities, or transfer restrictions.
Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is one life, its worth an attempt a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The contract at the provided address is not verified on the Base block explorer.
Read the full analysis- Mint capability UNKNOWN
- Ownership status UNKNOWN
- LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
- Liquidity < $50k
- Top-10 concentration > 50%
- Contract source not verified — its logic cannot be read
Exact factors
- Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
- Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
- LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
- Liquidity < $50k ($49,516 across 1 pairs — thin market)
- Top-10 concentration > 50% (52.6% total → 52.6% effective; 52.6% in EOAs, 0.0% in contracts; deployer/owner holds 37.8%)
- Contract source NOT verified — its logic cannot be read
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Oct 27Holders
as of audit · Oct 27, 2026- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell52.6%
- Everyone else756 holders47.4%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 27, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Oct 27The risk score reads depth across every pair.
Whether the LP tokens are locked could not be determined.
Security Findings
CriticalUnverified Source Code
The contract source code is not published on the block explorer, preventing any security assessment.C-01
Issue
The contract source code is not published on the block explorer, preventing any security assessment.
Fix
Verify the contract source code on the block explorer to allow for community and security review.
Status
Unresolved
HighLack of Transparency
The absence of verified code hides potential malicious functions such as blacklisting, minting, or tax manipulation.H-01
Issue
The absence of verified code hides potential malicious functions such as blacklisting, minting, or tax manipulation.
Fix
Publish the source code and provide documentation for all administrative functions.
Status
Unresolved
HighWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 52.6% of supply. What remains: 52.6% in wallets, 0.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 37.8%. A holder that also controls the contract can sell into its own liquidity. 766 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 52.6% of supply. What remains: 52.6% in wallets, 0.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 37.8%. A holder that also controls the contract can sell into its own liquidity. 766 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
766 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
766 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $50K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $272K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $50K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $272K (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $50K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $50K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — less than a day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 277.1 Architecture and 7.2 Code Security cannot be assessed due to the lack of source code. 7.3 Access Control and 7.6 External interactions are opaque. Without verification, the contract may contain backdoors, honeypot mechanisms, or malicious logic. Users have no visibility into the underlying implementation.
7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance parameters are unknown. There is no documentation regarding tokenomics, supply caps, or administrative control. The lack of transparency poses a significant risk of rug-pulls or unauthorized supply inflation.
7.7 Upgrades and 7.8 Operations are entirely opaque. It is impossible to determine if the contract is immutable or if it utilizes a proxy pattern that allows for arbitrary logic changes. Users should assume the highest level of risk regarding contract mutability.
Do not interact with this contract. Without verified source code, there is no way to ensure the safety of funds or the integrity of the token's logic.
Avoid providing liquidity or purchasing tokens associated with this address until the developer verifies the source code on the block explorer and provides a transparent audit.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Oct 27, 202678High
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of one life, its worth an attempt?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified