The contract at the provided address is not verified on the Ethereum block explorer. Consequently, the source code is unavailable for security analysis. Investors should exercise extreme caution as the lack of transparency prevents verification of ownership, tax mechanisms, or liquidity safety.
Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is Grand Theft Anakin a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The contract at the provided address is not verified on the Ethereum block explorer.
Read the full analysis- Mint capability UNKNOWN
- Ownership status UNKNOWN
- LP lock status UNKNOWN — the deepest pool's LP could not be read; this pool is 100% of DEX liquidity
- Liquidity not locked
- Liquidity < $50k
- Top-10 concentration > 20%
- Contract source not verified — its logic cannot be read
Exact factors
- Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
- Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
- LP lock status UNKNOWN — the deepest pool's LP could not be read; this pool is 100% of DEX liquidity
- Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool; this pool is 0% of DEX liquidity) — held by independent providers — market-depth risk
- Liquidity < $50k ($30,587 across 5 pairs — thin market)
- Top-10 concentration > 20% (34.7% total → 27.1% effective; 22.1% in EOAs, 12.6% in contracts)
- Contract source NOT verified — its logic cannot be read
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Nov 4Holders
as of audit · Nov 4, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking12.6%
- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell22.1%
- Everyone else112 holders65.3%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Nov 4, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Nov 4- Uniswap v4ETHAnalysed$30.6K100.0%
- Uniswap v4USDT$20.0%
- Uniswap v4USDS$00.0%
- Uniswap v4USDC$00.0%
- Uniswap v4ETH$00.0%
The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the checked pool, Uniswap v4, are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity. The LP of the deepest pool (100.0% of depth) could not be read, so whether it is locked is unknown.
0xe627…8b13No privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.
Security Findings
CriticalUnverified Source Code
The contract source code is not published on the block explorer, making it impossible to audit for security vulnerabilities or malicious logic.C-01
Issue
The contract source code is not published on the block explorer, making it impossible to audit for security vulnerabilities or malicious logic.
Fix
Verify the contract source code on the block explorer to allow for community and security review.
Status
Unresolved
HighUnlocked Liquidity
Liquidity for this token is currently unlocked, allowing the deployer to withdraw all funds from the liquidity pool at any time.H-01
Issue
Liquidity for this token is currently unlocked, allowing the deployer to withdraw all funds from the liquidity pool at any time.
Fix
Lock liquidity in a reputable, time-locked smart contract to protect investors.
Status
Unresolved
HighLack of Transparency
The project lacks public documentation or verifiable ownership, increasing the risk of centralized control and potential exit scams.H-02
Issue
The project lacks public documentation or verifiable ownership, increasing the risk of centralized control and potential exit scams.
Fix
Provide clear documentation regarding tokenomics, ownership, and project roadmap.
Status
Unresolved
MediumLiquidity not locked
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a wallet, 0xe627…8b13 — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY
Issue
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a wallet, 0xe627…8b13 — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.
Fix
Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 34.7% of supply. What remains: 22.1% in wallets, 12.6% in other contracts. 122 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 34.7% of supply. What remains: 22.1% in wallets, 12.6% in other contracts. 122 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
122 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
122 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $31K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $51K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $31K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $51K (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $31K of DEX liquidity across 5 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $31K of DEX liquidity across 5 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — less than a day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Nov 47.1 Architecture: Unknown. 7.2 Code Security: Cannot be assessed due to lack of source code. 7.3 Access Control: Cannot be verified; potential for hidden backdoors or owner-only functions exists. 7.6 External: Interactions with liquidity pools cannot be audited for safety.
7.4 Economic: Liquidity is currently unlocked, posing a high risk of rug-pull. 7.5 Governance: No documentation exists regarding tokenomics or administrative control. 7.8 Operations: The project lacks transparency and verifiable operational standards.
7.7 Upgrades: As the contract is unverified, it is impossible to determine if the contract is a proxy or if it contains upgradeable logic that could alter token behavior post-deployment.
Do not interact with this contract. The absence of verified source code is a major red flag that prevents any meaningful security assessment.
Without transparency, there is no way to ensure that the contract does not contain malicious functions such as blacklisting, infinite minting, or honeypot mechanisms.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Nov 4, 202664Medium
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Grand Theft Anakin?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified