On-chain security analysis — is it a scam or legit?
This audit report is generated without access to the smart contract's source code.
Read the full analysisEach factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Sep 4, 2026
The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.
0x9a8c…44e80x4c12…da0a0x5004…4d870x3b0c…3fcd0xcf95…207f0x1b34…3e960x4ff4…0c710xe025…01c90xc3e0…31bd0xef7a…ae3bNo privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.
The verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.
Re-check after any contract upgrade or ownership change, both of which can alter behaviour without changing this page.
Acknowledged
This audit report is generated without access to the smart contract's source code. Therefore, a comprehensive security analysis for the contract at address 0xb200000000000000000000046390aed221043f01 on the Base network could not be performed. All risk levels and findings are set to 'N/A' or 'Low' by default due to the absence of code for review.
Without access to the contract's source code, a technical assessment of its architecture (7.1), code security (7.2), and access control mechanisms (7.3) is not possible. Therefore, no specific strengths or issues can be identified in this section. A thorough review would typically involve analyzing reentrancy guards, integer overflow/underflow protections, and proper permissioning.
An evaluation of economic factors (7.4) and governance mechanisms (7.5) cannot be performed without the contract's source code and a clear understanding of the protocol's design. This includes assessing potential for oracle manipulation or flash loan attacks, as well as the robustness of any decentralized governance structures. External dependencies (7.6) also remain unassessed.
The upgradeability aspects (7.7) of the contract, including the use of proxy patterns (e.g., UUPS, Transparent) and their associated risks, cannot be determined without the source code. Operational procedures (7.8) related to upgrades also remain unknown. A proper assessment would confirm the safety and security of any upgrade path.
For any future deployments or interactions with this contract, it is strongly recommended to obtain and verify the full source code.
A comprehensive security audit should then be conducted to identify and mitigate potential vulnerabilities across all technical, economic, governance, and upgradeability aspects. Ensure all external dependencies are well-understood and trusted.
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
The Base Juice (BASEJUICE) contract on Base is 0xb200000000000000000000046390aed221043f01. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.
Quantum Audit's risk score for Base Juice is 15/100 (Low risk) as of Sep 4, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Liquidity lock: Not locked; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.
Liquidity lock: Not locked (as of Sep 4, 2026). Total DEX liquidity: $141.0K.
As of Sep 4, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 22.1% of the supply. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.
Our AI-powered scanner gives you a deeper, real-time smart contract analysis — free, with every scoring factor shown.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page
