The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 implementation with additional governance, voting, and vesting capabilities. The protocol relies on a centralized owner to manage minting rates and pool transfer restrictions. While the code follows standard OpenZeppelin patterns, the high degree of administrative control over supply and transferability introduces significant centralization risks for token holders.
Early-stage security check β honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is XTO π₯ a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot β the tokenβs risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 implementation with additional governance, voting, and vesting capabilities.
Read the full analysis- Owner can pause all transfers
- A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
- Mintable supply β no cap found, dilution unbounded
- LP lock status UNKNOWN β the pool's LP could not be read
- Top-10 concentration > 30%
Exact factors
- Owner can pause all transfers
- A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
- Mintable supply β no cap found, dilution unbounded
- LP lock status UNKNOWN β the pool's LP could not be read
- Top-10 concentration > 30% (100.0% total β 48.2% effective; 16.2% in EOAs, 80.0% in contracts; 3.8% burned, locked or in pools excluded)
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit Β· Oct 25Holders
as of audit Β· Oct 25, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking80.0%
- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell16.2%
- Burnedout of circulation3.8%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 25, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit Β· Oct 25The risk score reads depth across every pair.
Whether the LP tokens are locked could not be determined.
Security Findings
MediumCentralized Control Over Token Supply
The owner has the authority to call updateMintRate and release, which can increase the total supply of the token. This allows the owner to dilute the holdings of all existing token holders at their discretion.CP-01
Issue
The owner has the authority to call updateMintRate and release, which can increase the total supply of the token. This allows the owner to dilute the holdings of all existing token holders at their discretion.
Fix
Implement a timelock for minting operations or transition ownership to a decentralized governance model to prevent unilateral supply inflation.
Status
Unresolved
MediumCentralized Control Over Transferability
The owner can use the lockPool and unlockPool functions to enable or disable transfers for specific pools. This gives the owner the power to effectively freeze user funds or prevent trading activity.CP-05
Issue
The owner can use the lockPool and unlockPool functions to enable or disable transfers for specific pools. This gives the owner the power to effectively freeze user funds or prevent trading activity.
Fix
Remove the ability for the owner to arbitrarily halt transfers, or restrict this functionality to a decentralized emergency pause mechanism with clear, transparent triggers.
Status
Unresolved
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.8% burned β not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 10,012 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.8% burned β not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 10,012 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks β those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
10,012 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
10,012 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $139K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $155K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $139K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $155K (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown β they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics β Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $139K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics β Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $139K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched β less than a day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score β a new token is not a risky one by default β but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score β a new token is not a risky one by default β but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit Β· Oct 25The architecture utilizes robust, battle-tested OpenZeppelin libraries for ERC-20, voting, and permit functionality. 7.1 Architecture and 7.2 Code Security are well-implemented, adhering to standard patterns. 7.3 Access Control is strictly enforced via Ownable, though the scope of administrative power is broad. 7.6 External dependencies are limited to standard, verified libraries.
7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance aspects are heavily centralized under the contract owner. The owner has the ability to mint new tokens and halt pool transfers, which directly impacts token value and liquidity. While minting is capped at 2% annually, the lack of a timelock or decentralized governance mechanism remains a concern for long-term holders.
7.7 Upgrades are not supported as the contract is not a proxy. 7.8 Operations are straightforward, relying on standard ownership management. The lack of upgradeability ensures immutability of the current logic, preventing future logic changes without a new deployment.
To improve security and trust, consider transitioning the ownership to a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized governance contract (e.g., Governor Bravo or Compound Governor).
This would mitigate the risk of a single compromised key unilaterally altering the token supply or freezing liquidity. Additionally, implement a timelock mechanism for all sensitive administrative functions such as updateMintRate and lockPool. A delay of 24-48 hours would provide the community with sufficient notice and the ability to react to significant changes in the protocol's economic parameters.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Oct 25, 202658Medium
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots β history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the XTO contract address?
The XTO π₯ (XTO) contract on Base is 0xb9c4355809eec227a9022ee44fc8b8944e16372b. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.
Is XTO π₯ a scam?
Quantum Audit's risk score for XTO π₯ is 58/100 (Medium risk) as of Oct 25, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts β Contract verified: Verified; Ownership: Retained; Mint: Mintable; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.
Who holds XTO?
As of Oct 25, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 100.0% of the supply across 10,012 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of XTO π₯?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code β free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page