Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Is WSOS a Scam?

Base
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Nov 4, 2026 · 1 audit on recordNew Launch · 4h old
SummaryAI Copilot

ClankerToken is an ERC-20 compliant token designed for cross-chain interoperability on the Base network.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
  • Liquidity not locked
  • Top-10 concentration > 50%
Exact factors
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
  • Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool) — who holds it cannot be verified
  • Top-10 concentration > 50% (97.9% total → 56.5% effective; 28.8% in EOAs, 69.1% in contracts; deployer/owner holds 21.8%)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (4h old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.

Security Checklist

as of audit · Nov 45 of 7 checks passed
Contract verifiedVerified
OwnershipRenounced
MintMintable
Liquidity lockNot locked
UpgradeabilityFixed code
HoneypotNone found
Buy / sell tax0% / 0%

Holders

as of audit · Nov 4, 20261,024 holders
69.1%Contracts28.8%Wallets2.1%
69.1%Contracts28.8%Wallets
ContractsWalletsEveryone elseBubble area = share of supply
97.9%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking69.1%
  • Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell28.8%
  • Everyone else1,014 holders2.1%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads56.5%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Nov 4, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Nov 4$281.7K

The risk score reads depth across every pair.

LP tokensNot locked

The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.

Analysed pool$281.7KShare of depth100.0%
Top-1 Unlocked Holder100.0%
Top-3 Unlocked100.0%
Unlocked LP held by
0xffa3…0762

Security Findings

1 High1 Medium6 Info
High

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 97.9% of supply. What remains: 28.8% in wallets, 69.1% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 21.8%. A holder that also controls the contract can sell into its own liquidity. 1,024 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

The ten largest holders own 97.9% of supply. What remains: 28.8% in wallets, 69.1% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 21.8%. A holder that also controls the contract can sell into its own liquidity. 1,024 holders in total.

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Medium

Liquidity not locked

0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a contract, 0xffa3…0762 — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY

Issue

0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a contract, 0xffa3…0762 — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.

Fix

Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Centralized Minting Authority

The crosschainMint function allows the designated bridge contract to increase the total supply of tokens at any time. This can lead to the dilution of existing token holders' value if the bridge is compromised or misconfigured. Ownership is renounced, so no one can call these functions now.CP-01

Issue

The crosschainMint function allows the designated bridge contract to increase the total supply of tokens at any time. This can lead to the dilution of existing token holders' value if the bridge is compromised or misconfigured. Ownership is renounced, so no one can call these functions now.

Fix

Implement a hard cap on the total supply or introduce a governance-based delay for large minting operations to mitigate the risk of sudden inflation.

Status

Unresolved

Info

Bridge-Controlled Balance Manipulation

The crosschainBurn function grants the bridge contract the ability to burn tokens directly from any user's address. If the bridge contract is compromised, an attacker could drain funds from any user holding the token. Ownership is renounced, so no one can call these functions now.CP-02

Issue

The crosschainBurn function grants the bridge contract the ability to burn tokens directly from any user's address. If the bridge contract is compromised, an attacker could drain funds from any user holding the token. Ownership is renounced, so no one can call these functions now.

Fix

Restrict the burn functionality to only allow users to burn their own tokens, or implement a multi-step approval process for cross-chain transfers that requires user authorization.

Status

Unresolved

Info

Not listed by any independent source

1,024 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

1,024 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

The market for this token

Liquidity $282K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $49K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $282K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $49K (DexScreener, all pools).

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Project token

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: nobody (ownership renounced). Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $282K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: nobody (ownership renounced). Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $282K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.

Fix

Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Recently launched — less than a day of market history

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT

Issue

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.

Fix

Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Nov 4
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

ClankerToken is an ERC-20 compliant token designed for cross-chain interoperability on the Base network. The contract utilizes standard OpenZeppelin libraries for governance and permit functionality. While the core token logic is robust, the protocol relies on a privileged bridge contract for cross-chain operations, which introduces centralized control over token supply and individual user balances.

Technical6/10Medium risk

The architecture follows standard ERC-20 and ERC-7802 patterns, ensuring compatibility with cross-chain bridges. 7.1 Architecture: Modular design using standard libraries. 7.2 Code Security: Implementation is clean and follows best practices. 7.3 Access Control: Restricted to the SuperchainTokenBridge for sensitive operations. 7.6 External: Relies on the bridge contract for cross-chain integrity.

Governance1/10High risk

7.4 Economic: The token supply is elastic due to cross-chain minting/burning capabilities. 7.5 Governance: Administrative functions allow for metadata updates by a single admin. 7.8 Operations: The protocol relies on the security of the SuperchainTokenBridge to prevent unauthorized supply inflation.

Upgrades5/10Medium risk

7.7 Upgrades: The contract is not currently implemented as a proxy, meaning logic is immutable. No upgrade mechanisms are present in the source code. Future changes would require a full contract migration.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

The protocol should implement a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized governance contract to manage the administrative functions, reducing the risk of a single point of failure.

Additionally, ensure that the SuperchainTokenBridge address is monitored for any anomalous activity that could impact token supply or user balances. Users should be aware that the cross-chain bridge holds significant authority over the token's state. Regular audits of the bridge contract are recommended to ensure the integrity of the cross-chain minting and burning processes.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
TypeClankerToken
NetworkBase
Token age4h
Contract0x09b5…ea9e
Deployer0x294b…dcc3
Badge for your website
WSOS security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Nov 4, 202667High

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of WSOS?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified