Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

Is Apple 3x Long a Scam?

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Apple 3x Long AAPLX3L
0xce8d…9b07
Base
Not verifiedThis record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.
Last checked today 1 audit on record New Launch · 6h old
DexScreener ↗
How is this score calculated? → High Risk
Executive SummaryAI Copilot

The ClankerToken contract is an ERC-20 compliant token with additional features for cross-chain operations and administrative control. The audit identified two key areas of centralized control: the ability for a designated bridge address to mint new tokens and to burn tokens from any holder's balance. An admin role also exists for metadata updates. These centralized powers introduce medium to high risks related to token supply dilution and arbitrary balance manipulation.

1 High2 Medium5 Informational
! Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (6h old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.
Volume 24h
$41.19M
Liquidity
$10.30M
Price
$0.000102
Token Age
6h
Top 10 Holders
100.0%

Security Findings

1 High2 Med5 Info
High

Centralized Control Over Individual Token Balances (Burning)

CP-02The `crosschainBurn` function grants the `SuperchainTokenBridge` address the ability to destroy ClankerTokens from any holder's balance without their consent. This means that the `SuperchainTokenBridge` can arbitrarily reduce the token holdings of any individual or entity, posing a direct and severe risk to token ownership and security.
IssueThe `crosschainBurn` function grants the `SuperchainTokenBridge` address the ability to destroy ClankerTokens from any holder's balance without their consent. This means that the `SuperchainTokenBridge` can arbitrarily reduce the token holdings of any individual or entity, posing a direct and severe risk to token ownership and security.
FixToken holders face a high risk due to the `SuperchainTokenBridge`'s ability to burn tokens from any account. This power should be managed with extreme caution. It is critical to ensure the `SuperchainTokenBridge` address is secured with the highest possible standards, such as a robust multi-signature setup with geographically distributed signers and strict operational policies. Token holders should seek clarity on the circumstances under which this burn function would be utilized and what recou…
StatusUnresolved
Medium

Centralized Control Over Token Supply (Minting)

CP-01The `crosschainMint` function allows a specific address, identified as the `SuperchainTokenBridge`, to create new ClankerTokens at any time and send them to any address. This means that the total supply of ClankerTokens can be increased without limit, potentially diluting the value of tokens held by existing token holders.
IssueThe `crosschainMint` function allows a specific address, identified as the `SuperchainTokenBridge`, to create new ClankerTokens at any time and send them to any address. This means that the total supply of ClankerTokens can be increased without limit, potentially diluting the value of tokens held by existing token holders.
FixToken holders should be aware that the `SuperchainTokenBridge` has the power to mint new tokens. It is important to understand the policies and security measures in place for this bridge address, as its compromise could lead to uncontrolled token inflation. Consider advocating for transparent reporting on minting events or for the implementation of safeguards like multi-signature control or time-locks on the `crosschainMint` function.
StatusUnresolved
Medium

Liquidity not locked

QA-LIQUIDITY0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 3 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. No single one holds a majority: their exits thin the market rather than hand anyone the pool. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.
Issue0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 3 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. No single one holds a majority: their exits thin the market rather than hand anyone the pool. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.
FixCheck the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

Who holds the supply

QA-HOLDERSThe ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. What remains: 1.0% in wallets, 99.0% in other contracts. 2,258 holders in total.
IssueThe ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. What remains: 1.0% in wallets, 99.0% in other contracts. 2,258 holders in total.
FixWatch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

Not listed by any independent source

QA-IDENTITY2,258 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Issue2,258 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
FixMatch the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

The market for this token

QA-MARKETLiquidity $10.3M (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $41.2M (DexScreener, all pools).
IssueLiquidity $10.3M (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $41.2M (DexScreener, all pools).
FixSize any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

Asset class: Project token

QA-PROFILEA token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: an owner key. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $10.3M of DEX liquidity across 3 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
IssueA token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: an owner key. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $10.3M of DEX liquidity across 3 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
FixCheck the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

Recently launched — less than a day of market history

QA-RECENTThe token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
IssueThe token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
FixRe-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
StatusAcknowledged

Category Ratings

TechnicalMedium6/10

The ClankerToken contract is an ERC-20 compliant token, inheriting from OpenZeppelin's robust ERC20, ERC20Burnable, ERC20Votes, and ERC20Permit standards, ensuring a solid foundation (7.1 Architecture). The code for standard ERC-20 operations is well-tested and secure. However, the contract includes privileged functions, `crosschainMint` and `crosschainBurn`, which allow a specific `SuperchainTokenBridge` address to directly manipulate token supply and individual user balances (7.2 Code Security, 7.3 Access Control). This centralized control over core token mechanics represents a significant technical risk.

GovernanceHigh1/10

The economic model of ClankerToken is subject to significant centralized control. The `SuperchainTokenBridge` address has the power to mint an arbitrary amount of new tokens via `crosschainMint`, which can dilute the value for existing token holders (7.4 Economic). Furthermore, this same entity can burn tokens from any holder's balance using `crosschainBurn`, posing a direct threat to individual token ownership (7.4 Economic). An `_admin` role also exists to update administrative state like metadata, but does not directly impact token economics (7.5 Governance). These centralized controls introduce a medium economic risk, as the integrity of the token supply and individual balances relies heavily on the security and trustworthiness of the controlling address.

UpgradesHigh3/10

The ClankerToken contract is not implemented as an upgradeable proxy (7.7 Upgrades). Therefore, there are no upgrade-specific risks associated with this contract. Any future changes to the token's logic would require deploying an entirely new contract and migrating assets, which is a standard practice for non-upgradeable tokens.

Security Checklist

2/5 checks passed
Contract VerifiedPass
Ownership RenouncedFail
No Mint FunctionFail
Liquidity LockedFail
Not a ProxyPass
HoneypotNoneBuy Tax0.0%Sell Tax0.0%

Holder Composition

100.0% in top 10
1.0% in wallets99.0% in contracts
Effective Concentration40.6%

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Liquidity Depth

$10.30M across 3 pairs
AerodromeUSDCanalysed$10.30M100.0%Uniswap v4WETH$00.0%

The risk score reads depth across every pair. The volume figure and the volume-to-liquidity ratio elsewhere on this page describe only the pair this audit analysed, so the two are not directly comparable.

LP Distribution

Top-1 Unlocked Holder45.3%
Top-3 Unlocked100.0%

Key Addresses

4 addresses
Deployer
0x010e…6c69
Unlocked LP Held By
0xc796…6c470x602c…06ac0x3e44…b36c

No privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.

What Raised This Score

4 factors
  • Owner can change any holder's balance (seize or credit tokens)
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
  • Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool) — held by independent providers — market-depth risk
  • Top-10 concentration > 30% (100.0% total → 40.6% effective; 1.0% in EOAs, 99.0% in contracts)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Related Audits

6 more on the record
ether.fi governance token (ETHFI)High RiskCluster Protocol (CP)High RiskWorldMobileToken (WMTX)High RiskResearchCoin (RSC)High RiskFren PetHigh RiskBaseStonk (BSTONK)Medium Risk

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Apple 3x Long?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit