Quantum Audit Logo

Is Wrapped TON Coin Safe?

On-chain security analysis — is it a scam or legit?

Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page →

Wrapped TON Coin TONCOIN
0x76a7…220f
BNB Chain
Not verifiedThis record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked today 1 audit on record
Executive SummaryAI Copilot

The audited Bridge token contract implements standard ERC-20 functionality without any identified critical or high-severity vulnerabilities. A key characteristic is the complete absence of privileged functions, meaning no single entity can alter core token behavior or transfer mechanisms. This design promotes decentralization and reduces central point of failure risks.

2 Medium5 Informational
Volume 24h
$391.5K
Liquidity
$57.0K
Price
$1.5600
Token Age
4y
Top 10 Holders
10.1%

Security Findings

Medium

Liquidity not locked

QA-LIQUIDITY0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 99.5% is held, unlocked, by 10 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a wallet, 0x4101…1ac1 — holds 92.2% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them. This assessment covers the main pool, which holds 25% of the token's DEX liquidity; the other pools were not assessed.
Issue0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 99.5% is held, unlocked, by 10 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a wallet, 0x4101…1ac1 — holds 92.2% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them. This assessment covers the main pool, which holds 25% of the token's DEX liquidity; the other pools were not assessed.
FixCheck the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
StatusAcknowledged
Medium

What the token's controller can do

QA-POWERSThe contract lets its controller — an owner that could not be resolved — mint new supply. Nothing independent vouches for whoever holds them, so each is a live risk to holders.
IssueThe contract lets its controller — an owner that could not be resolved — mint new supply. Nothing independent vouches for whoever holds them, so each is a live risk to holders.
FixCheck who holds these powers and whether a timelock or multisig stands between them and holders.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

No issues identified in the reviewed source

I-01The verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (mint capability, holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.
IssueThe verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (mint capability, holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.
FixRe-check after any contract upgrade or ownership change, both of which can alter behaviour without changing this page.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

Who holds the supply

QA-HOLDERSThe ten largest holders own 10.1% of supply. Of that, 1.9% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 8.2% in wallets, 0.0% in other contracts. 119,561 holders in total.
IssueThe ten largest holders own 10.1% of supply. Of that, 1.9% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 8.2% in wallets, 0.0% in other contracts. 119,561 holders in total.
FixWatch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

Identity verified by independent sources

QA-IDENTITYListed on CoinGecko as Gram (prev. Toncoin) (GRAM), market cap $4.2B, rank #33. Traded on Binance. 119,561 holders. Verified by: CoinGecko, exchange listings.
IssueListed on CoinGecko as Gram (prev. Toncoin) (GRAM), market cap $4.2B, rank #33. Traded on Binance. 119,561 holders. Verified by: CoinGecko, exchange listings.
FixMatch the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

The market for this token

QA-MARKETLiquidity $227K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $62.7M (CoinGecko, all markets, daily snapshot). 24h trading volume $917K (DexScreener, all pools).
IssueLiquidity $227K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $62.7M (CoinGecko, all markets, daily snapshot). 24h trading volume $917K (DexScreener, all pools).
FixSize any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

Asset class: Project token

QA-PROFILEA token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $227K of DEX liquidity across 30 pools. Launch: 1823 days of market history.
IssueA token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $227K of DEX liquidity across 30 pools. Launch: 1823 days of market history.
FixCheck the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
StatusAcknowledged

Category Ratings

TechnicalLow8/10

The contract implements the ERC-20 standard, providing `transfer` and `transferFrom` functions for token movement. A significant strength is the absence of any privileged functions, ensuring that no single address or role can unilaterally control or modify the token's core logic or transfer mechanisms (7.3 Access Control). This design choice significantly reduces technical attack vectors related to centralized control (7.2 Code Security). No specific technical vulnerabilities were identified in the provided code.

GovernanceLow7/10

The economic model of this token contract is straightforward, adhering to the ERC-20 standard without complex internal mechanisms. Crucially, there are no governance or administrative functions that could introduce economic manipulation risks or centralized control over token supply or transfers (7.4 Economic). The absence of privileged roles means no single entity can pause transfers or blacklist addresses, enhancing decentralization (7.5 Governance).

UpgradesMedium6/10

The contract is not implemented as a proxy and therefore is not upgradeable (7.7 Upgrades). This design choice ensures immutability of the contract's logic, providing a high degree of certainty regarding its long-term behavior. While this prevents future modifications, it also eliminates risks associated with upgrade mechanisms, such as malicious upgrades or proxy-specific vulnerabilities.

Security Checklist

Contract VerifiedPass
Ownership Renounced?
No Mint FunctionFail
Liquidity LockedFail
Not a ProxyPass
HoneypotNoneBuy Tax0.0%Sell Tax0.0%

Holder Composition

8.2% in wallets0.0% in contracts
Effective Concentration8.2%

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Liquidity Depth

Show 4 more pairsShow less

The 20 remaining pairs hold $9.4K between them and are not listed.

The risk score reads depth across every pair. The volume figure and the volume-to-liquidity ratio elsewhere on this page describe only the pair this audit analysed, so the two are not directly comparable.

LP Distribution

Top-1 Unlocked Holder92.2%
Top-3 Unlocked97.0%

Key Addresses

Deployer
0x191c…54d1
Unlocked LP Held By
0x4101…1ac10xa82d…2dae0x5c64…19620x4a9e…01830x585f…cc9a0x9fe0…0c180xe707…80a30xbca1…78370x5e87…d9580xf625…985d

No privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.

What Raised This Score

  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
  • Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool; this pool is 25% of DEX liquidity) — held by independent providers — market-depth risk

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Related Audits

ZygoSwap (ZSWAP)Low RiskSIRENLow RiskANDYLow RiskDogshitLow RiskIBSLow Risk妖蝶Low Risk

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Wrapped TON Coin?

Our AI-powered scanner gives you a deeper, real-time smart contract analysis — free, with every scoring factor shown.

Get Detailed Audit