The contract is a standard ERC-20 token implementation utilizing a Beacon proxy pattern. The code follows established OpenZeppelin patterns for token transfers and metadata management. No vulnerabilities were identified in the provided source code analysis. The protocol relies on a centralized owner contract for minting and metadata updates.

On-chain security analysis — is it a scam or legit?
Is Wrapped SOL Safe?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The contract is a standard ERC-20 token implementation utilizing a Beacon proxy pattern.
Read the full analysis- Issuer controls retained
Exact factors
- Issuer controls retained (admin key, mint, upgrade) — counterparty risk on a known issuer, not a rug vector
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Oct 26Holders
as of audit · Oct 26, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking4.3%
- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell9.8%
- DEX poolsthe pools' own liquidity5.0%
- Everyone else32,594 holders81.0%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 26, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Oct 26- UniswapWETHAnalysed$158.0K75.0%
- Quickswap v299PC$16.2K7.7%
- UniswapWPOL$14.7K7.0%
- UniswapUSDC$7.9K3.7%
- Quickswap v3WETH$5.0K2.4%
- UniswapUSDT0$2.9K1.4%
Show 4 more pairs
The 7 remaining pairs hold $200 between them and are not listed. The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.
0x3e56…83c60x9750…f14c0xf6d9…a47f0x7555…b6760xc9eb…00c10x1056…0d880xd1c7…0e230xd7b1…ac730x298c…5b070xfba8…1a53No privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.
Security Findings
InfoNo issues identified in the reviewed source
The verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (mint/owner authority, mint capability, holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.I-01
Issue
The verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (mint/owner authority, mint capability, holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.
Fix
Re-check after any contract upgrade or ownership change, both of which can alter behaviour without changing this page.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 19.0% of supply. Of that, 5.0% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 9.8% in wallets, 4.3% in other contracts. 32,604 holders in total. For a verified reference asset the largest holders are custodians, exchanges and bridges; concentration is reported, not scored.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 19.0% of supply. Of that, 5.0% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 9.8% in wallets, 4.3% in other contracts. 32,604 holders in total. For a verified reference asset the largest holders are custodians, exchanges and bridges; concentration is reported, not scored.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoIdentity verified by independent sources
Listed on CoinGecko as Wormhole Bridged WSOL (WSOL). Traded on Binance. 32,604 holders. Verified by: exchange listings.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
Listed on CoinGecko as Wormhole Bridged WSOL (WSOL). Traded on Binance. 32,604 holders. Verified by: exchange listings.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $211K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $240K (CoinGecko, all markets, daily snapshot). 24h trading volume $54K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $211K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $240K (CoinGecko, all markets, daily snapshot). 24h trading volume $54K (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoWhat the token's controller can do
The contract lets its controller — a contract — mint new supply. These are the issuer's controls by design; for a verified issuer they are counterparty risk — the issuer can act on any holder, including you.QA-POWERS
Issue
The contract lets its controller — a contract — mint new supply. These are the issuer's controls by design; for a verified issuer they are counterparty risk — the issuer can act on any holder, including you.
Fix
Check who holds these powers and whether a timelock or multisig stands between them and holders.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Wrapped or bridged asset
A token representing another asset's units 1:1, backed by a wrapping contract, a custodian or a bridge. Scored as an established reference asset: its identity is verified, so the issuer's or protocol's controls (listed as findings) are real and are priced once as counterparty risk, and LP locks and holder concentration are not scored — its pools belong to market makers and its largest holders are exchanges, bridges and custody. Basis: CoinGecko category: Bridged-Tokens. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a contract. Code: upgradeable proxy. Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $211K of DEX liquidity across 17 pools. Launch: 1668 days of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token representing another asset's units 1:1, backed by a wrapping contract, a custodian or a bridge. Scored as an established reference asset: its identity is verified, so the issuer's or protocol's controls (listed as findings) are real and are priced once as counterparty risk, and LP locks and holder concentration are not scored — its pools belong to market makers and its largest holders are exchanges, bridges and custody. Basis: CoinGecko category: Bridged-Tokens. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a contract. Code: upgradeable proxy. Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $211K of DEX liquidity across 17 pools. Launch: 1668 days of market history.
Fix
The backing is the risk: check who holds the underlying asset and how redemption works.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 26The architecture utilizes a robust Beacon proxy pattern, ensuring consistent implementation across multiple instances. Code security is maintained through standard ERC-20 implementations and safe arithmetic via Solidity 0.8.x. Access control is strictly enforced using the onlyOwner modifier on sensitive functions like mint and updateDetails. 7.1 Architecture: Beacon Proxy; 7.2 Code Security: Standard; 7.3 Access Control: Centralized Owner.
The economic model is centralized, with the owner holding the authority to mint new tokens and modify metadata. This creates a trust dependency on the owner contract. 7.4 Economic: Centralized minting; 7.5 Governance: Owner-controlled.
The contract employs a Beacon proxy pattern, which is a secure and standard way to manage upgrades for multiple contracts simultaneously. 7.7 Upgrades: Beacon Proxy; 7.8 Operations: Standard.
The contract is well-structured and follows industry standards.
It is recommended to transition the owner role to a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized governance contract to mitigate the risks associated with a single point of failure in the minting and metadata update functions. Ensure that the Beacon owner is secured with robust key management practices and that any future upgrades are subject to a time-lock mechanism to provide transparency and security to token holders.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Oct 26, 20269Low
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the SOL contract address?
The Wrapped SOL (SOL) contract on Polygon is 0xd93f7e271cb87c23aaa73edc008a79646d1f9912. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.
Is Wrapped SOL a scam?
Quantum Audit's risk score for Wrapped SOL is 9/100 (Low risk) as of Oct 26, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Ownership: Retained; Mint: Mintable; Liquidity lock: Not locked; Upgradeability: Upgradeable; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.
Is SOL liquidity locked?
Liquidity lock: Not locked (as of Oct 26, 2026). Total DEX liquidity: $210.7K.
Who holds SOL?
As of Oct 26, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 19.0% of the supply across 32,604 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Wrapped SOL?
Our AI-powered scanner gives you a deeper, real-time smart contract analysis — free, with every scoring factor shown.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified