On-chain security analysis — is it a scam or legit?
PolygonThe AIPF token is a standard ERC-20 implementation with additional minting capabilities.
Read the full analysisEach factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 20, 2026
The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are locked or burned.
0x5afb…c1d3No privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.
The mint(address,uint256) function allows the 'hgl' and 'qem' addresses to create new tokens at will. This allows these controllers to increase the total supply, which directly dilutes the value of all existing tokens held by users.
Implement a maximum supply cap or move the minting function to a governance-controlled contract to ensure that supply changes are transparent and community-approved.
Unresolved
The ten largest holders own 98.9% of supply. Of that, 10.9% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 0.6% in wallets, 87.4% in other contracts. 43,753 holders in total.
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Acknowledged
Listed on CoinGecko as AI Powered Finance (AIPF), market cap $31M, rank #638. 43,753 holders. Verified by: CoinGecko.
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Acknowledged
100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% of the LP tokens were sent to a burn address — that liquidity can never be withdrawn by anyone. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.
Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
Acknowledged
Liquidity $6.6M (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $167K (CoinGecko, all markets, daily snapshot). 24h trading volume $182K (DexScreener, all pools).
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Acknowledged
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: nobody (ownership renounced). Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: 0% on buy, 5% on sell. Market: $6.6M of DEX liquidity across 3 pools. Launch: 335 days of market history.
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Acknowledged
The AIPF token is a standard ERC-20 implementation with additional minting capabilities. While ownership has been renounced, the contract retains a centralized minting mechanism controlled by two specific addresses (hgl and qem). The architecture follows standard patterns, but the ability to arbitrarily increase supply poses a significant economic risk to token holders.
The contract utilizes standard OpenZeppelin-style ERC-20 logic for transfers and allowances. 7.1 Architecture is straightforward, relying on standard state variables for balances. 7.2 Code Security is high due to the use of SafeMath-like patterns and standard pragma versions. 7.3 Access Control is implemented for minting and pair management, though the minting logic remains a centralization point.
7.4 Economic risk is elevated due to the minting function. 7.5 Governance is non-existent as ownership is renounced, yet the minting controllers (hgl, qem) operate without community oversight. This creates a risk of sudden supply inflation that could dilute existing holders.
7.7 Upgrades are not applicable as the contract is not a proxy. The implementation is immutable, which provides security against logic changes but prevents fixing the minting issue without a migration. 7.8 Operations are stable as the contract logic is fixed.
The protocol should consider implementing a hard cap on the total supply or transitioning the minting authority to a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized governance contract.
This would provide transparency and prevent unilateral supply expansion by the current controllers. Investors should be aware that the 'hgl' and 'qem' addresses have the power to mint tokens at any time. We recommend monitoring these addresses for any unexpected activity that could impact the token's market value.
Our AI-powered scanner gives you a deeper, real-time smart contract analysis — free, with every scoring factor shown.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page
