Is WFI Safe? Smart Contract Security Analysis

Security Findings

1 Med5 Info

Medium

Liquidity not locked

QA-LIQUIDITY0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 70.0% is held, unlocked, by 10 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. No single one holds a majority: their exits thin the market rather than hand anyone the pool. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.

Issue0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 70.0% is held, unlocked, by 10 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. No single one holds a majority: their exits thin the market rather than hand anyone the pool. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.

FixCheck the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.

StatusAcknowledged

Info

No issues identified in the reviewed source

I-01The verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (mint/owner authority, mint capability, holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.

IssueThe verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (mint/owner authority, mint capability, holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.

FixRe-check after any contract upgrade or ownership change, both of which can alter behaviour without changing this page.

StatusAcknowledged

Info

Who holds the supply

QA-HOLDERSThe ten largest holders own 96.9% of supply. What remains: 5.6% in wallets, 91.3% in other contracts. 33,197 holders in total.

IssueThe ten largest holders own 96.9% of supply. What remains: 5.6% in wallets, 91.3% in other contracts. 33,197 holders in total.

FixWatch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

StatusAcknowledged

Info

Listed, but not independently verified

QA-IDENTITYListed on CoinGecko as WeFi (WFI). 33,197 holders.

IssueListed on CoinGecko as WeFi (WFI). 33,197 holders.

FixMatch the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

StatusAcknowledged

Info

The market for this token

QA-MARKETLiquidity $37K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $2.6M (CoinGecko, all markets, daily snapshot). 24h trading volume $175K (DexScreener, all pools).

IssueLiquidity $37K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $2.6M (CoinGecko, all markets, daily snapshot). 24h trading volume $175K (DexScreener, all pools).

FixSize any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

StatusAcknowledged

Info

Asset class: Project token

QA-PROFILEA token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: a single wallet (EOA). Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $37K of DEX liquidity across 5 pools. Launch: 677 days of market history.

IssueA token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: a single wallet (EOA). Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $37K of DEX liquidity across 5 pools. Launch: 677 days of market history.

FixCheck the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.

StatusAcknowledged

Category Ratings

TechnicalLow8/10

The WFI contract implements the ERC-20 standard, including ERC20Permit for gasless approvals. Its architecture is straightforward, inheriting from ERC20 and Ownable2Step. The core ERC-20 functions like transfer and transferFrom operate as expected without additional privileged controls affecting their execution. This simplicity contributes to a low technical risk profile (7.1 Architecture, 7.2 Code Security).

GovernanceHigh3/10

The contract utilizes the Ownable2Step pattern, allowing the owner to securely transfer ownership via a two-step process (7.3 Access Control). The owner's control is limited to administrative functions such as transferOwnership and renounceOwnership. Critically, no privileged functions exist that can directly manipulate token balances, pause transfers, or blacklist addresses, which significantly reduces economic risk (7.4 Economic, 7.5 Governance).

UpgradesMedium6/10

The WFI contract is not deployed as a proxy (7.7 Upgrades). Therefore, it does not possess any upgradeability mechanisms. This means the contract's logic is immutable once deployed, eliminating upgrade-related risks but also preventing future modifications.

Security Checklist

3/5 checks passed

Contract VerifiedPass

Ownership RenouncedFail

No Mint FunctionPass

Liquidity LockedFail

Not a ProxyPass

HoneypotNoneBuy Tax0.0%Sell Tax0.0%

Holder Composition

96.9% in top 10

5.6% in wallets91.3% in contracts

Effective Concentration42.1%

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Liquidity Depth

$37.4K across 5 pairs

Pancakeswap v3USDTanalysed$36.8K UniswapUSDT$544 Pancakeswap v2WBNB$8 Pancakeswap v3USDT$4 Pancakeswap v2USDT$3

The risk score reads depth across every pair. The volume figure and the volume-to-liquidity ratio elsewhere on this page describe only the pair this audit analysed, so the two are not directly comparable.

LP Distribution

Top-1 Unlocked Holder20.7%

Top-3 Unlocked41.9%

Key Addresses

11 addresses

Deployer

0x82da…1228

Unlocked LP Held By

0x5488…74af0xaba4…6a830xe012…4c600xef25…4a9a0x3fd2…4b050x7971…3cb30xf9a1…e5580x8800…d5100xf84e…6afc0x3c81…a7d8

No privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.

What Raised This Score

4 factors

Ownership NOT renounced — the owner keeps admin functions
Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool; this pool is 99% of DEX liquidity) — held by independent providers — market-depth risk
Liquidity < $50k ($37,384 across 5 pairs — thin market)
Top-10 concentration > 30% (96.9% total → 42.1% effective; 5.6% in EOAs, 91.3% in contracts)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Not Signed In

Is WFI Safe?

Security Findings

Liquidity not locked

No issues identified in the reviewed source

Who holds the supply

Listed, but not independently verified

The market for this token

Asset class: Project token

Category Ratings

Security Checklist

Holder Composition

Liquidity Depth

LP Distribution

Key Addresses

What Raised This Score

Related Audits

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of WFI?