The ClankerToken is an ERC-20 compliant token with cross-chain capabilities integrated via the Superchain Token Bridge. The architecture relies on the bridge contract to manage supply fluctuations across chains. While the core token logic follows standard OpenZeppelin implementations, the privileged cross-chain functions introduce significant centralization risks regarding supply control and user balance manipulation.
Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is USOS a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The ClankerToken is an ERC-20 compliant token with cross-chain capabilities integrated via the Superchain Token Bridge.
Read the full analysis- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
- Liquidity not locked
- Top-10 concentration > 50%
Exact factors
- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
- Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool) — who holds it cannot be verified
- Top-10 concentration > 50% (99.3% total → 57.1% effective; 29.0% in EOAs, 70.2% in contracts; deployer/owner holds 21.8%)
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Nov 4Holders
as of audit · Nov 4, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking70.2%
- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell29.0%
- Everyone else1,008 holders0.7%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Nov 4, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Nov 4The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.
0xffa3…0762Security Findings
HighWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 99.3% of supply. What remains: 29.0% in wallets, 70.2% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 21.8%. A holder that also controls the contract can sell into its own liquidity. 1,018 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 99.3% of supply. What remains: 29.0% in wallets, 70.2% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 21.8%. A holder that also controls the contract can sell into its own liquidity. 1,018 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
MediumLiquidity not locked
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a contract, 0xffa3…0762 — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY
Issue
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a contract, 0xffa3…0762 — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.
Fix
Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoPrivileged Minting Authority
The crosschainMint function allows the Superchain Token Bridge to increase the total supply of the token. This capability can lead to the dilution of existing token holders if the bridge is compromised or misconfigured. Ownership is renounced, so no one can call these functions now.CP-01
Issue
The crosschainMint function allows the Superchain Token Bridge to increase the total supply of the token. This capability can lead to the dilution of existing token holders if the bridge is compromised or misconfigured. Ownership is renounced, so no one can call these functions now.
Fix
Ensure the bridge contract is secured with robust access controls and consider implementing a supply cap if cross-chain minting needs to be bounded.
Status
Unresolved
InfoPrivileged Balance Manipulation
The crosschainBurn function allows the Superchain Token Bridge to directly remove tokens from any user's balance. This grants the bridge the power to seize or destroy user funds, which is a high-risk centralization point. Ownership is renounced, so no one can call these functions now.CP-02
Issue
The crosschainBurn function allows the Superchain Token Bridge to directly remove tokens from any user's balance. This grants the bridge the power to seize or destroy user funds, which is a high-risk centralization point. Ownership is renounced, so no one can call these functions now.
Fix
Restrict the burn functionality to only allow users to burn their own tokens, or implement a transparent, verifiable process for cross-chain burns that minimizes the bridge's direct control over user balances.
Status
Unresolved
InfoNot listed by any independent source
1,018 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
1,018 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $265K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $45K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $265K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $45K (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: nobody (ownership renounced). Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $265K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: nobody (ownership renounced). Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $265K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — less than a day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Nov 4The contract utilizes standard OpenZeppelin libraries for ERC-20, Votes, and Permit functionality, ensuring high interoperability. 7.1 Architecture is modular, leveraging the Superchain Token Bridge for cross-chain operations. 7.2 Code Security is robust, with no identified reentrancy or overflow vulnerabilities. 7.3 Access Control is strictly enforced for administrative functions, though the bridge contract holds significant power.
7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance risks are centralized within the bridge and the admin role. The admin can update metadata and administrative addresses, while the bridge controls the total supply. 7.6 External dependencies are limited to the Superchain bridge, which acts as a single point of failure for cross-chain integrity. The economic model is susceptible to bridge-level compromise.
7.7 Upgrades are not explicitly implemented via proxy patterns in this contract. The contract is immutable in its current deployment. 7.8 Operations are straightforward, relying on standard bridge events for cross-chain synchronization.
The protocol should implement a multi-signature wallet or a timelock mechanism for the admin role to mitigate the risk of unauthorized metadata or administrative changes.
Additionally, users should be aware that the Superchain Token Bridge holds the authority to burn or mint tokens, which is a necessary design choice for cross-chain functionality but represents a significant trust assumption.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Nov 4, 202668High
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the USOS contract address?
The USOS contract on Base is 0x5df82b9cc7ddd86cf9c020b50fa3d25453a84a7c. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.
Is USOS a scam?
Quantum Audit's risk score for USOS is 68/100 (High risk) as of Nov 4, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Ownership: Renounced; Mint: Mintable; Liquidity lock: Not locked; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.
Is USOS liquidity locked?
Liquidity lock: Not locked (as of Nov 4, 2026). Total DEX liquidity: $265.4K.
Who holds USOS?
As of Nov 4, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 99.3% of the supply across 1,018 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of USOS?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified