Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Is Unicorn a Scam?

UNICORNEthereum
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Oct 25, 2026 · 1 audit on recordNew Launch · 12h old
SummaryAI Copilot

The RobinVistaToken is a standard ERC20 implementation utilizing a factory-based initialization pattern.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
  • Ownership status UNKNOWN
  • Liquidity not locked
  • Liquidity < $50k
  • Top-10 concentration > 30%
Exact factors
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
  • Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
  • Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool; this pool is 99% of DEX liquidity) — withdrawable by the owner/deployer — rug-pull risk
  • Liquidity < $50k ($31,182 across 5 pairs — thin market)
  • Top-10 concentration > 30% (47.4% total → 32.2% effective; 22.0% in EOAs, 25.4% in contracts)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (12h old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.

Security Checklist

as of audit · Oct 254 of 7 checks passed
Contract verifiedVerified
OwnershipUnknown
MintMintable
Liquidity lockNot locked
UpgradeabilityFixed code
HoneypotNone found
Buy / sell tax0% / 0%

Holders

as of audit · Oct 25, 202686 holders
25.4%Contracts22.0%Wallets52.6%Everyone else
25.4%Contracts22.0%Wallets52.6%Everyone else
ContractsWalletsEveryone elseBubble area = share of supply
47.4%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking25.4%
  • Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell22.0%
  • Everyone else76 holders52.6%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads32.2%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 25, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Oct 25$31.2K across 5 pairs
LP tokensNot locked

The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.

Analysed pool$30.9KShare of depth98.9%
Top-1 Unlocked Holder100.0%
Top-3 Unlocked100.0%
Unlocked LP held by
0xeebb…ee84

A privileged address — the deployer, the owner, or the token contract itself — is among these holders, so that party can withdraw liquidity.

Security Findings

1 High2 Medium1 Low6 Info
High

Liquidity withdrawable by the owner/deployer

0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by the token's owner/deployer (0xeebb…ee84) — they can pull that liquidity at any moment. This is the rug-pull path. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY

Issue

0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by the token's owner/deployer (0xeebb…ee84) — they can pull that liquidity at any moment. This is the rug-pull path. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.

Fix

Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.

Status

Acknowledged

Medium

Initialization Front-running

The initialize function is public and lacks protection against front-running. An attacker could potentially call initialize before the intended deployer, setting arbitrary parameters.M-01

Issue

The initialize function is public and lacks protection against front-running. An attacker could potentially call initialize before the intended deployer, setting arbitrary parameters.

Fix

Ensure the factory contract calls the initialize function immediately after deployment in the same transaction.

Status

Unresolved

Medium

What the token's controller can do

The contract lets its controller — an owner that could not be resolved — mint new supply. Nothing independent vouches for whoever holds them, so each is a live risk to holders.QA-POWERS

Issue

The contract lets its controller — an owner that could not be resolved — mint new supply. Nothing independent vouches for whoever holds them, so each is a live risk to holders.

Fix

Check who holds these powers and whether a timelock or multisig stands between them and holders.

Status

Acknowledged

Low

Lack of Zero Address Validation

The setPool function does not validate that the baseToken address is not the zero address.L-01

Issue

The setPool function does not validate that the baseToken address is not the zero address.

Fix

Add a require(baseToken_ != address(0), 'Invalid address') check.

Status

Unresolved

Info

Metadata Immutability

Token metadata (name, symbol) is set during initialization and cannot be updated, which is standard but limits flexibility.I-01

Issue

Token metadata (name, symbol) is set during initialization and cannot be updated, which is standard but limits flexibility.

Fix

None required; this is a design choice.

Status

Unresolved

Info

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 47.4% of supply. What remains: 22.0% in wallets, 25.4% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 5.6%. 86 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

The ten largest holders own 47.4% of supply. What remains: 22.0% in wallets, 25.4% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 5.6%. 86 holders in total.

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Not listed by any independent source

86 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

86 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

The market for this token

Liquidity $31K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $80K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $31K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $80K (DexScreener, all pools).

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Project token

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $31K of DEX liquidity across 5 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $31K of DEX liquidity across 5 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.

Fix

Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Recently launched — less than a day of market history

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT

Issue

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.

Fix

Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 25
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The RobinVistaToken is a standard ERC20 implementation utilizing a factory-based initialization pattern. The contract logic is clean and relies on audited OpenZeppelin libraries. No critical vulnerabilities were identified; however, the initialization pattern requires careful handling to prevent unauthorized state setting.

Technical6/10Medium risk

The architecture follows a standard factory-clone pattern (7.1). Code security is high due to the use of OpenZeppelin's battle-tested ERC20 implementation (7.2). Access control is correctly implemented via the factory pattern (7.3). The contract lacks complex external dependencies, minimizing external risk (7.6).

Governance1/10High risk

Economic parameters are defined at initialization (7.4). Governance is centralized within the factory contract (7.5). Operations are straightforward with no complex staking or lending logic (7.8).

Upgrades2/10High risk

The contract uses a proxy pattern (7.7). Upgrades are managed via the factory, which is standard for this architecture. No specific upgrade logic is exposed in the token contract itself.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

Ensure the factory contract is deployed securely and that the initialization parameters are validated before calling the initialize function.

Monitor the factory for any potential unauthorized access to the setPool function.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
TypeRobinVistaToken
NetworkEthereum
Token age12h
Contract0x1040…44de
Deployer0xeebb…ee84
Badge for your website
Unicorn security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Oct 25, 202684High

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the UNICORN contract address?

The Unicorn contract on Ethereum is 0x104087d3e23849900636d2d0cba0adff04d744de. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.

Is Unicorn a scam?

Quantum Audit's risk score for Unicorn is 84/100 (High risk) as of Oct 25, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Mint: Mintable; Liquidity lock: Not locked; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.

Is UNICORN liquidity locked?

Liquidity lock: Not locked (as of Oct 25, 2026). Total DEX liquidity: $31.2K.

Who holds UNICORN?

As of Oct 25, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 47.4% of the supply across 86 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Unicorn?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page