The contract at the provided address is not verified on the Base block explorer. Consequently, the source code is unavailable for security review. Investors should exercise extreme caution as the lack of transparency prevents verification of ownership, tax mechanisms, or supply controls.
Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is The Stonks Exchange a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The contract at the provided address is not verified on the Base block explorer.
Read the full analysis- Mint capability UNKNOWN
- Ownership status UNKNOWN
- LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
- Top-10 concentration > 50%
- Contract source not verified — its logic cannot be read
Exact factors
- Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
- Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
- LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
- Top-10 concentration > 50% (50.1% total → 50.1% effective; 50.1% in EOAs, 0.0% in contracts)
- Contract source NOT verified — its logic cannot be read
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Oct 31Holders
as of audit · Oct 31, 2026- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell50.1%
- Everyone else606 holders49.9%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 31, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Oct 31The risk score reads depth across every pair.
Whether the LP tokens are locked could not be determined.
Security Findings
CriticalUnverified Contract Source Code
The contract source code is not published on the block explorer, preventing any security analysis or verification of contract behavior.C-01
Issue
The contract source code is not published on the block explorer, preventing any security analysis or verification of contract behavior.
Fix
Publish the source code on the block explorer and undergo a professional security audit before requesting user interaction.
Status
Unresolved
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 50.1% of supply. What remains: 50.1% in wallets, 0.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 19.4%. 616 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 50.1% of supply. What remains: 50.1% in wallets, 0.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 19.4%. 616 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
616 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
616 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $115K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $960K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $115K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $960K (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $115K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $115K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — less than a day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 317.1 Architecture: Unknown. 7.2 Code Security: Cannot be verified due to lack of source code. 7.3 Access Control: Cannot be verified. 7.6 External: Interactions with external protocols cannot be audited.
7.4 Economic: Tokenomics and tax logic are opaque. 7.5 Governance: Administrative privileges cannot be identified. The risk of rug-pulls or hidden minting functions remains high.
7.7 Upgrades: Proxy status cannot be confirmed. 7.8 Operations: Operational security is entirely dependent on the deployer's intent, which is unverifiable.
Do not interact with this contract. Without verified source code, it is impossible to determine if the contract contains malicious functions such as honeypot mechanisms, unauthorized minting, or restricted selling.
Prioritize assets with verified, audited, and transparent codebases.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Oct 31, 202667High
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the STONKEX contract address?
The The Stonks Exchange (STONKEX) contract on Base is 0xbc8bfb16dd921296589d330af4d63e95daa456ae. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.
Is The Stonks Exchange a scam?
Quantum Audit's risk score for The Stonks Exchange is 67/100 (High risk) as of Oct 31, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Not verified; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.
Who holds STONKEX?
As of Oct 31, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 50.1% of the supply across 616 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of The Stonks Exchange?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified