Is The Nietzschean Dog (RUSS) Safe? Smart Contract Security Analysis

Security Findings

1 Info

Info

No code-level findings — an SPL mint exposes no auditable program source

I-01This token is an SPL token mint, not a deployed program: there is no contract source code on-chain for a line-by-line review, so no code-level vulnerability could be identified either way. The assessment on this page therefore rests on holder concentration, which are read directly from chain state and from third-party risk registries.

IssueThis token is an SPL token mint, not a deployed program: there is no contract source code on-chain for a line-by-line review, so no code-level vulnerability could be identified either way. The assessment on this page therefore rests on holder concentration, which are read directly from chain state and from third-party risk registries.

FixRead the risk score breakdown below as the substance of this audit. For a code-level review, the token would need an accompanying verified program.

StatusAcknowledged

Category Ratings

TechnicalMedium6/10

The token is implemented using the spl-token-2022 program. Key administrative authorities, including the mint authority and freeze authority, have been revoked, ensuring no new tokens can be minted and no accounts can be frozen. No Token-2022 extensions such as a transfer hook or permanent delegate are active, nor is the default account state frozen. The token's supply is fixed at 965,069,443.024803 RUSS with 6 decimals.

GovernanceHigh1/10

The token has a total DEX liquidity of $11,615. Over the last 24 hours, the token recorded a volume of $112,635, resulting in a Volume/Liquidity Ratio of 9.70. The DEX pair is 7 days old, indicating a relatively new market. Holder concentration shows the top 10 accounts hold 49.62% of the supply, which is below the threshold for high concentration.

UpgradesMedium5/10

The token's core parameters are immutable due to the revocation of both mint and freeze authorities. No Token-2022 extensions that would allow for post-launch modifications, such as a transfer hook or permanent delegate, are configured. Metadata mutability is also set to False, meaning the token's name, symbol, or image cannot be changed after launch.

Security Checklist

1/4 checks passed

Contract VerifiedFail

No Mint Function?

Liquidity LockedFail

Not a ProxyPass

Liquidity Depth

$6.9K

The risk score reads depth across every pair. The volume figure and the volume-to-liquidity ratio elsewhere on this page describe only the pair this audit analysed, so the two are not directly comparable.

What Raised This Score

7 factors

Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
Contract source NOT verified
Top-10 concentration > 70% (82.2% total → 82.2% effective; 82.2% in EOAs, 0.0% in contracts — extreme)
Liquidity NOT locked (owner can withdraw — rug-pull risk)
Liquidity < $10k ($6,865 across 1 pairs — easily drained)
Token age < 30 days (still settling)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Is The Nietzschean Dog Safe?