New Launch · 5d old

Solana · Early Security Check · Jul 24, 2026

Is spucex a Scam? SPCX

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Contract 9qpDk7…pump DexScreener ↗

70 / 100

High Risk How is this score calculated? →

! Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (5d old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.

Volume 24h

$5.9K

Liquidity

$15.0K

Price

$0.00001695

Token Age

Top 10 Holders

61.6%

Critical Security Flags

1/5 checks passed

Contract VerifiedFail

Ownership RenouncedUnknown

No Mint FunctionUnknown

Liquidity LockedFail

Not a ProxyPass

Audit History

2 audits on record

Jul 2370

Every audit run adds a dated snapshot — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Audit Summary

The spucex (SPCX) token mint on Solana exhibits a robust security configuration with both mint and freeze authorities revoked, preventing further token issuance or account freezing. No transfer hooks or default frozen account states are active, ensuring standard token behavior. However, holder distribution data was unavailable, which prevents a full assessment of potential market manipulation risks.

Final Recommendation: Before interacting with this token, verify on-chain that the mint and freeze authorities remain revoked. Continuously monitor the token's liquidity and trading volume for any significant changes that could impact price stability. If holder distribution data becomes available, assess the concentration to understand potential market impact from large holders.

Category Ratings

TechnicalMedium

6/10

The spucex (SPCX) token is implemented using the spl-token-2022 program. Both the Mint Authority and Freeze Authority have been revoked, preventing the creation of new tokens or the freezing of holder accounts. The token does not utilize a transfer hook, ensuring standard transfer behavior without c

GovernanceHigh

1/10

The token's DEX liquidity stands at $14,095, which is moderate. The 24-hour volume is $741, resulting in a healthy Volume/Liquidity Ratio of 0.05, which does not indicate wash trading. The DEX pair has been active for 30 days, providing some track record. However, holder concentration data was

UpgradesMedium

5/10

The token's core parameters are largely immutable due to the revocation of both Mint and Freeze Authorities. The `metadata_mutable` flag is False, ensuring that the token's name, symbol, or image cannot be altered post-launch. Furthermore, `transfer_fee_upgradable` and `transfer_hook_upgra

What Raised This Score

7 factors

Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
Contract source NOT verified
Top-10 concentration > 50% (61.6% total → 61.6% effective; 61.6% in EOAs, 0.0% in contracts — heavy)
Liquidity NOT locked (owner can withdraw — rug-pull risk)
Liquidity < $50k ($15,007 across 1 pairs — thin market)
Token age < 7 days (early, volatile)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Frequently Asked Questions

Is spucex a scam?

While spucex (SPCX) exhibits some positive attributes like renounced ownership and no mint function, critical red flags prevent a definitive 'safe' assessment. The contract is unverified, meaning its code isn't publicly reviewable for safety. Crucially, liquidity is not locked, creating a high risk of a rug pull where funds could be withdrawn. These factors elevate the potential for significant investor risk, though the data doesn't conclusively label it a scam.

Is spucex safe to buy?

Investing in spucex (SPCX) carries significant risk based on the available data. The primary concerns include the unverified contract, which means its code hasn't been publicly scrutinized for vulnerabilities or malicious functions. Furthermore, the liquidity is not locked, leaving it susceptible to sudden withdrawal by providers, which could drastically impact trading. The concentration of 34.6% of supply among the top 10 holders also adds to market manipulation potential. Caution and thorough personal research are strongly advised.

Has spucex been audited?

The spucex (SPCX) contract is listed as 'Contract verified: False.' This indicates its code has not been publicly published on the blockchain explorer. Without this fundamental transparency, a formal security audit cannot be performed or independently verified. Consequently, investors lack the assurance an audit would provide regarding the contract's integrity and potential vulnerabilities remain opaque.

Is spucex a Scam? SPCX

Critical Security Flags

Audit History

Audit Summary

Category Ratings

What Raised This Score

Frequently Asked Questions

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of spucex?