Is spucex (SPCX) a Scam? New Token Security Check

spucex SPCX

9qpDk7…pump

Solana Not verifiedLast checked 3d ago 1 audit on record New Launch · 5d old

DexScreener ↗

77 / 100

Critical Risk

Executive SummaryAI Copilot

The spucex (SPCX) token mint on Solana exhibits a robust security configuration with both mint and freeze authorities revoked, preventing further token issuance or account freezing. No transfer hooks or default frozen account states are active, ensuring standard token behavior. However, holder distribution data was unavailable, which prevents a full assessment of potential market manipulation risks.

1 Informational

! Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (5d old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.

Volume 24h

$632.8200

Liquidity

$13.3K

Price

$0.000009879

Token Age

Top 10 Holders

78.7%

Security Findings

1 Info

Info

No code-level findings — an SPL mint exposes no auditable program source

I-01This token is an SPL token mint, not a deployed program: there is no contract source code on-chain for a line-by-line review, so no code-level vulnerability could be identified either way. The assessment on this page therefore rests on holder concentration, which are read directly from chain state and from third-party risk registries.

IssueThis token is an SPL token mint, not a deployed program: there is no contract source code on-chain for a line-by-line review, so no code-level vulnerability could be identified either way. The assessment on this page therefore rests on holder concentration, which are read directly from chain state and from third-party risk registries.

FixRead the risk score breakdown below as the substance of this audit. For a code-level review, the token would need an accompanying verified program.

StatusAcknowledged

Category Ratings

TechnicalMedium6/10

The spucex (SPCX) token is implemented using the spl-token-2022 program. Both the Mint Authority and Freeze Authority have been revoked, preventing the creation of new tokens or the freezing of holder accounts. The token does not utilize a transfer hook, ensuring standard transfer behavior without custom on-chain logic. Additionally, the `balance_mutable` flag is set to False, indicating that no authority can arbitrarily adjust user balances.

GovernanceHigh1/10

The token's DEX liquidity stands at $14,095, which is moderate. The 24-hour volume is $741, resulting in a healthy Volume/Liquidity Ratio of 0.05, which does not indicate wash trading. The DEX pair has been active for 30 days, providing some track record. However, holder concentration data was unavailable, precluding an assessment of potential whale-driven market risks.

UpgradesMedium5/10

The token's core parameters are largely immutable due to the revocation of both Mint and Freeze Authorities. The `metadata_mutable` flag is False, ensuring that the token's name, symbol, or image cannot be altered post-launch. Furthermore, `transfer_fee_upgradable` and `transfer_hook_upgradable` are both False, confirming that these extensions cannot be introduced or modified.

Security Checklist

1/4 checks passed

Contract VerifiedFail

No Mint Function?

Liquidity LockedFail

Not a ProxyPass

Liquidity Depth

$13.3K

The risk score reads depth across every pair. The volume figure and the volume-to-liquidity ratio elsewhere on this page describe only the pair this audit analysed, so the two are not directly comparable.

What Raised This Score

7 factors

Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
Contract source NOT verified
Top-10 concentration > 70% (78.7% total → 78.7% effective; 78.7% in EOAs, 0.0% in contracts — extreme)
Liquidity NOT locked (owner can withdraw — rug-pull risk)
Liquidity < $50k ($13,265 across 1 pairs — thin market)
Token age < 7 days (early, volatile)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Frequently Asked Questions

Is spucex a scam?

While spucex (SPCX) exhibits some positive attributes like renounced ownership and no mint function, critical red flags prevent a definitive 'safe' assessment. The contract is unverified, meaning its code isn't publicly reviewable for safety. Crucially, liquidity is not locked, creating a high risk of a rug pull where funds could be withdrawn. These factors elevate the potential for significant investor risk, though the data doesn't conclusively label it a scam.

Is spucex safe to buy?

Investing in spucex (SPCX) carries significant risk based on the available data. The primary concerns include the unverified contract, which means its code hasn't been publicly scrutinized for vulnerabilities or malicious functions. Furthermore, the liquidity is not locked, leaving it susceptible to sudden withdrawal by providers, which could drastically impact trading. The concentration of 34.6% of supply among the top 10 holders also adds to market manipulation potential. Caution and thorough personal research are strongly advised.

Has spucex been audited?

The spucex (SPCX) contract is listed as 'Contract verified: False.' This indicates its code has not been publicly published on the blockchain explorer. Without this fundamental transparency, a formal security audit cannot be performed or independently verified. Consequently, investors lack the assurance an audit would provide regarding the contract's integrity and potential vulnerabilities remain opaque.

Is spucex a Scam?

Security Findings

No code-level findings — an SPL mint exposes no auditable program source

Category Ratings

Security Checklist

Liquidity Depth

What Raised This Score

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Audits

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of spucex?