Solana · Smart Contract Security · Updated Jul 24, 2026

Is Football Capital Markets Safe? FCM

On-chain security analysis — is it a scam or legit?

Contract Hkpi2S…pump DexScreener ↗

76 / 100

Critical Risk How is this score calculated? →

Volume 24h

$5.5K

Liquidity

$49.7K

Price

$0.0002216

Token Age

12d

Top 10 Holders

71.1%

Security Checklist

1/5 checks passed

Contract VerifiedFail

Ownership RenouncedUnknown

No Mint FunctionUnknown

Liquidity LockedFail

Not a ProxyPass

Audit History

2 audits on record

Jul 2376

Every audit run adds a dated snapshot — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Audit Summary

The Football Capital Markets (FCM) SPL Token Mint audit found no critical or high-severity issues based on available on-chain data and external security registries. The mint and freeze authorities are revoked, and no Token-2022 extensions that introduce centralisation risks (like transfer hooks or permanent delegates) are active. Holder distribution data was unavailable for analysis, preventing an assessment of supply concentration.

Final Recommendation: Holders should verify on-chain that the mint and freeze authorities remain revoked to ensure the supply is fixed and accounts cannot be frozen. Monitor for any future changes in the token's on-chain configuration, although current settings indicate immutability for key parameters. If holder distribution data becomes available, assess concentration risk before making significant investments.

Category Ratings

TechnicalMedium

6/10

The token is implemented using the spl-token-2022 program. Both the Mint Authority and Freeze Authority are revoked (None), indicating that no new tokens can be minted and no holder accounts can be frozen. Key Token-2022 extensions such as Transfer Hook and Default Account State Frozen are not activ

GovernanceHigh

1/10

The token exhibits moderate liquidity with $35,970 in total DEX liquidity, which is sufficient for small to medium trades without severe slippage. The 24-hour volume of $4,461 results in a healthy Volume/Liquidity Ratio of 0.12, showing no signs of wash trading. The DEX pair has been active for 45 d

UpgradesMedium

5/10

The token's core parameters are immutable, as both the Mint Authority and Freeze Authority have been revoked. The metadata is also immutable, with 'metadata_mutable: False', ensuring the token's name, symbol, and image cannot be changed post-launch. Furthermore, the transfer fee

What Raised This Score

7 factors

Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
Contract source NOT verified
Top-10 concentration > 70% (71.1% total → 71.1% effective; 71.1% in EOAs, 0.0% in contracts — extreme)
Liquidity NOT locked (owner can withdraw — rug-pull risk)
Liquidity < $50k ($49,695 across 5 pairs — thin market)
Token age < 30 days (still settling)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Football Capital Markets a scam?

While the data does not definitively label Football Capital Markets as a scam, it exhibits several high-risk characteristics. The unverified contract, unrenounced ownership, and unlocked liquidity create conditions where malicious actions are possible. These factors contribute to its 61/100 high-risk score, warranting extreme caution from potential investors regarding the project's long-term viability and integrity.

Is Football Capital Markets safe to buy?

Football Capital Markets is currently assessed as having a high-risk profile (61/100), suggesting it is not safe for typical investment. Key safety concerns include the contract not being verified, ownership not being renounced, and the project's liquidity not being locked. These elements mean the project's integrity is heavily reliant on the developer's trustworthiness, which carries inherent risks for investors.

Has Football Capital Markets been audited?

The Football Capital Markets contract is reported as "unverified." This means its source code has not been publicly provided or confirmed to match the deployed code on the blockchain. Without contract verification, a thorough and verifiable security audit is practically impossible for external parties. This lack of transparency prevents independent review of its functionalities and security.