Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

On-chain security analysis — is it a scam or legit?

Is Football Capital Markets Safe?

FCMSolana
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Sep 22, 2026 · 2 audits on record
Chart
Low RiskHow is this score calculated?
How the score breaks downratings: 10 is safest
Technical10/10Governance5/10Upgrades10/10Checks passed4 of 4Findings1 Info1
SummaryAI Copilot

The Football Capital Markets (FCM) SPL Token Mint audit found no critical or high-severity issues based on available on-chain data and external security registries.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • Top-10 concentration > 70%
  • Liquidity < $50k
  • Token age < 30 days
Exact factors
  • Top-10 concentration > 70% (87.2% total → 87.2% effective; 87.2% in EOAs, 0.0% in contracts — extreme)
  • Liquidity < $50k ($30,964 across 2 pairs — thin market)
  • Token age < 30 days (still settling)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Security Checklist

as of audit · Sep 224 of 4 checks passed
Contract verifiedVerified
MintNo mint
Liquidity lockLocked
UpgradeabilityFixed code

Holders

as of audit · Sep 22, 2026
87.2%Top 10 holders12.8%Everyone else
87.2%Top 10 holders12.8%
Top 10 holdersEveryone elseBubble area = share of supply
87.2%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Top 10 holdersthe ten largest balances87.2%
  • Everyone elsethe rest of the supply12.8%

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Sep 22, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Sep 22$31.0K across 2 pairs

The risk score reads depth across every pair.

LP tokensLocked

The LP tokens of the analysed pool are locked or burned.

Analysed pool$31.0KShare of depth100.0%

Security Findings

1 Info
Info

No code-level findings — an SPL mint exposes no auditable program source

This token is an SPL token mint, not a deployed program: there is no contract source code on-chain for a line-by-line review, so no code-level vulnerability could be identified either way. The assessment on this page therefore rests on mint/owner authority, mint capability, LP lock/burn state, holder concentration, which are read directly from chain state and from third-party risk registries.I-01

Issue

This token is an SPL token mint, not a deployed program: there is no contract source code on-chain for a line-by-line review, so no code-level vulnerability could be identified either way. The assessment on this page therefore rests on mint/owner authority, mint capability, LP lock/burn state, holder concentration, which are read directly from chain state and from third-party risk registries.

Fix

Read the risk score breakdown below as the substance of this audit. For a code-level review, the token would need an accompanying verified program.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Sep 22
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The Football Capital Markets (FCM) SPL Token Mint audit found no critical or high-severity issues based on available on-chain data and external security registries. The mint and freeze authorities are revoked, and no Token-2022 extensions that introduce centralisation risks (like transfer hooks or permanent delegates) are active. Holder distribution data was unavailable for analysis, preventing an assessment of supply concentration.

Technical10/10Low risk

The token is implemented using the spl-token-2022 program. Both the Mint Authority and Freeze Authority are revoked (None), indicating that no new tokens can be minted and no holder accounts can be frozen. Key Token-2022 extensions such as Transfer Hook and Default Account State Frozen are not active. External security signals confirm that the balance is not mutable, and the token is not freezable or non-transferable, enhancing its security posture.

Governance5/10Medium risk

The token exhibits moderate liquidity with $35,970 in total DEX liquidity, which is sufficient for small to medium trades without severe slippage. The 24-hour volume of $4,461 results in a healthy Volume/Liquidity Ratio of 0.12, showing no signs of wash trading. The DEX pair has been active for 45 days, providing a reasonable track record. Holder concentration data was unavailable, preventing an assessment of potential whale manipulation.

Upgrades10/10Low risk

The token's core parameters are immutable, as both the Mint Authority and Freeze Authority have been revoked. The metadata is also immutable, with 'metadata_mutable: False', ensuring the token's name, symbol, and image cannot be changed post-launch. Furthermore, the transfer fee and transfer hook configurations are not upgradable, providing stability and predictability for token holders.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

Holders should verify on-chain that the mint and freeze authorities remain revoked to ensure the supply is fixed and accounts cannot be frozen.

Monitor for any future changes in the token's on-chain configuration, although current settings indicate immutability for key parameters. If holder distribution data becomes available, assess concentration risk before making significant investments.

Contract & Record

2 audits on record
TypeSPL Token-2022
NetworkSolana
Token age12d
ContractHkpi2S…pump
Badge for your website
Football Capital Markets security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Sep 22, 202626Low
  2. Jul 23, 202676High

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Football Capital Markets a scam?

While the data does not definitively label Football Capital Markets as a scam, it exhibits several high-risk characteristics. The unverified contract, unrenounced ownership, and unlocked liquidity create conditions where malicious actions are possible. These factors contribute to its 61/100 high-risk score, warranting extreme caution from potential investors regarding the project's long-term viability and integrity.

Is Football Capital Markets safe to buy?

Football Capital Markets is currently assessed as having a high-risk profile (61/100), suggesting it is not safe for typical investment. Key safety concerns include the contract not being verified, ownership not being renounced, and the project's liquidity not being locked. These elements mean the project's integrity is heavily reliant on the developer's trustworthiness, which carries inherent risks for investors.

Has Football Capital Markets been audited?

The Football Capital Markets contract is reported as "unverified." This means its source code has not been publicly provided or confirmed to match the deployed code on the blockchain. Without contract verification, a thorough and verifiable security audit is practically impossible for external parties. This lack of transparency prevents independent review of its functionalities and security.

Related Audits

6 more on the recordAll audits
Dogeus MaximusDOGEUS · Solana26LowSPCX69Solana26LowBatCatSolana26LowPump GuyPUMPGUY · Solana26LowMario64Solana26LowZSolana26Low

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Football Capital Markets?

Our AI-powered scanner gives you a deeper, real-time smart contract analysis — free, with every scoring factor shown.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page