Is Football Capital Markets (FCM) Safe? Smart Contract Security Analysis

Football Capital Markets FCM

Hkpi2S…pump

Solana Not verifiedLast checked 3d ago 1 audit on record

DexScreener ↗

76 / 100

Critical Risk

Executive SummaryAI Copilot

The Football Capital Markets (FCM) SPL Token Mint audit found no critical or high-severity issues based on available on-chain data and external security registries. The mint and freeze authorities are revoked, and no Token-2022 extensions that introduce centralisation risks (like transfer hooks or permanent delegates) are active. Holder distribution data was unavailable for analysis, preventing an assessment of supply concentration.

1 Informational

Volume 24h

$2.2K

Liquidity

$28.6K

Price

$0.00005459

Token Age

12d

Top 10 Holders

85.1%

Security Findings

1 Info

Info

No code-level findings — an SPL mint exposes no auditable program source

I-01This token is an SPL token mint, not a deployed program: there is no contract source code on-chain for a line-by-line review, so no code-level vulnerability could be identified either way. The assessment on this page therefore rests on holder concentration, which are read directly from chain state and from third-party risk registries.

IssueThis token is an SPL token mint, not a deployed program: there is no contract source code on-chain for a line-by-line review, so no code-level vulnerability could be identified either way. The assessment on this page therefore rests on holder concentration, which are read directly from chain state and from third-party risk registries.

FixRead the risk score breakdown below as the substance of this audit. For a code-level review, the token would need an accompanying verified program.

StatusAcknowledged

Category Ratings

TechnicalMedium6/10

The token is implemented using the spl-token-2022 program. Both the Mint Authority and Freeze Authority are revoked (None), indicating that no new tokens can be minted and no holder accounts can be frozen. Key Token-2022 extensions such as Transfer Hook and Default Account State Frozen are not active. External security signals confirm that the balance is not mutable, and the token is not freezable or non-transferable, enhancing its security posture.

GovernanceHigh1/10

The token exhibits moderate liquidity with $35,970 in total DEX liquidity, which is sufficient for small to medium trades without severe slippage. The 24-hour volume of $4,461 results in a healthy Volume/Liquidity Ratio of 0.12, showing no signs of wash trading. The DEX pair has been active for 45 days, providing a reasonable track record. Holder concentration data was unavailable, preventing an assessment of potential whale manipulation.

UpgradesMedium5/10

The token's core parameters are immutable, as both the Mint Authority and Freeze Authority have been revoked. The metadata is also immutable, with 'metadata_mutable: False', ensuring the token's name, symbol, and image cannot be changed post-launch. Furthermore, the transfer fee and transfer hook configurations are not upgradable, providing stability and predictability for token holders.

Security Checklist

1/4 checks passed

Contract VerifiedFail

No Mint Function?

Liquidity LockedFail

Not a ProxyPass

Liquidity Depth

$28.6K across 4 pairs

PumpswapSOLanalysed$28.6K Meteora DYN2SOL$20 Meteora DYN2IME$6 Meteora DYN2CSR$4

The risk score reads depth across every pair. The volume figure and the volume-to-liquidity ratio elsewhere on this page describe only the pair this audit analysed, so the two are not directly comparable.

What Raised This Score

7 factors

Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
Contract source NOT verified
Top-10 concentration > 70% (85.1% total → 85.1% effective; 85.1% in EOAs, 0.0% in contracts — extreme)
Liquidity NOT locked (owner can withdraw — rug-pull risk)
Liquidity < $50k ($28,600 across 4 pairs — thin market)
Token age < 30 days (still settling)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Football Capital Markets a scam?

While the data does not definitively label Football Capital Markets as a scam, it exhibits several high-risk characteristics. The unverified contract, unrenounced ownership, and unlocked liquidity create conditions where malicious actions are possible. These factors contribute to its 61/100 high-risk score, warranting extreme caution from potential investors regarding the project's long-term viability and integrity.

Is Football Capital Markets safe to buy?

Football Capital Markets is currently assessed as having a high-risk profile (61/100), suggesting it is not safe for typical investment. Key safety concerns include the contract not being verified, ownership not being renounced, and the project's liquidity not being locked. These elements mean the project's integrity is heavily reliant on the developer's trustworthiness, which carries inherent risks for investors.

Has Football Capital Markets been audited?

The Football Capital Markets contract is reported as "unverified." This means its source code has not been publicly provided or confirmed to match the deployed code on the blockchain. Without contract verification, a thorough and verifiable security audit is practically impossible for external parties. This lack of transparency prevents independent review of its functionalities and security.

Is Football Capital Markets Safe?