The FlapTaxTokenV3 is an EIP-1167 minimal clone token deployed on BSC. The contract ownership has been renounced on-chain, effectively disabling all privileged administrative functions. The architecture is immutable, and the token logic is standard ERC-20 with additional tax-enforcement mechanisms. No vulnerabilities were identified in the provided source code analysis.
Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is The Final Form COW a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The FlapTaxTokenV3 is an EIP-1167 minimal clone token deployed on BSC.
Read the full analysis- Liquidity not locked
- Liquidity < $50k
- Volume/Liquidity > 15×
- Top-10 concentration > 70%
Exact factors
- Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool) — held by independent providers — market-depth risk
- Liquidity < $50k ($21,368 across 1 pairs — thin market)
- Volume/Liquidity > 15× (37.9× — wash-trading signal)
- Top-10 concentration > 70% (98.0% total → 84.7% effective; 75.8% in EOAs, 22.2% in contracts)
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Oct 20Holders
as of audit · Oct 20, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking22.2%
- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell75.8%
- Everyone else124 holders2.0%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 20, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Oct 20The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.
0x2d6c…043cNo privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.
Security Findings
MediumLiquidity not locked
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a wallet, 0x2d6c…043c — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY
Issue
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a wallet, 0x2d6c…043c — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.
Fix
Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNo issues identified in the reviewed source
The verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (mint/owner authority, mint capability, holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.I-01
Issue
The verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (mint/owner authority, mint capability, holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.
Fix
Re-check after any contract upgrade or ownership change, both of which can alter behaviour without changing this page.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 98.0% of supply. What remains: 75.8% in wallets, 22.2% in other contracts. 134 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 98.0% of supply. What remains: 75.8% in wallets, 22.2% in other contracts. 134 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
134 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
134 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $21K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $809K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $21K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $809K (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: nobody (ownership renounced). Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: 0% on buy, 0.99% on sell. Market: $21K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: nobody (ownership renounced). Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: 0% on buy, 0.99% on sell. Market: $21K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — less than a day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 20The contract utilizes a robust EIP-1167 minimal clone pattern, ensuring consistent and immutable logic. 7.1 Architecture is sound, 7.2 Code Security is high due to the use of standard OpenZeppelin libraries, and 7.3 Access Control is effectively locked. 7.6 External dependencies are limited to standard ERC-20 interfaces, minimizing integration risks.
7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance risks are mitigated by the renunciation of ownership. Since the owner cannot call migration functions, the token's tax state is effectively frozen in its current configuration. This prevents any potential rug-pull or arbitrary fee adjustment scenarios.
7.7 Upgrades are not possible as the contract is a minimal clone. The implementation address is hardcoded into the proxy bytecode, ensuring 7.8 Operations remain stable and predictable. No upgrade path exists for the logic or the state management.
The protocol is in a secure, immutable state due to the renunciation of ownership.
No further action is required for the current deployment. Users should verify the contract address against official documentation to ensure they are interacting with the intended clone.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Oct 20, 202657Medium
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the HEYI contract address?
The The Final Form COW (HEYI) contract on BNB Chain is 0xb7a2fd3d8663b2389f3913664127cab6eb137777. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.
Is The Final Form COW a scam?
Quantum Audit's risk score for The Final Form COW is 57/100 (Medium risk) as of Oct 20, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Ownership: Renounced; Mint: No mint; Liquidity lock: Not locked; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 1%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.
Is HEYI liquidity locked?
Liquidity lock: Not locked (as of Oct 20, 2026). Total DEX liquidity: $21.4K.
Who holds HEYI?
As of Oct 20, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 98.0% of the supply across 134 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of The Final Form COW?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page