Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

Is PLAYZAP Safe?

On-chain security analysis — is it a scam or legit?

Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page →

PLAYZAP PZP
0xdce4…9612
BNB Chain
Not verifiedThis record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked today 1 audit on record
DexScreener ↗
How is this score calculated? → Medium Risk
Executive SummaryAI Copilot

The PZP contract is an ERC-20 token implementation with additional administrative functions for managing roles and facilitating fund transfers. The audit found no critical or high-severity vulnerabilities in the provided code. However, the contract exhibits a high degree of centralization, with significant control over contract funds vested in specific administrative roles. This centralization introduces operational and governance risks that warrant careful management.

1 Medium5 Informational
Volume 24h
$106.2K
Liquidity
$33.8K
Price
$0.006574
Token Age
1y
Top 10 Holders
76.9%

Security Findings

1 Med5 Info
Medium

Liquidity not locked

QA-LIQUIDITY0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a wallet, 0x6af0…6cc2 — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.
Issue0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a wallet, 0x6af0…6cc2 — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.
FixCheck the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

No issues identified in the reviewed source

I-01The verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (mint/owner authority, mint capability, holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.
IssueThe verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (mint/owner authority, mint capability, holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.
FixRe-check after any contract upgrade or ownership change, both of which can alter behaviour without changing this page.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

Who holds the supply

QA-HOLDERSThe ten largest holders own 76.9% of supply. Of that, 1.8% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 54.4% in wallets, 20.7% in other contracts. 3,949 holders in total.
IssueThe ten largest holders own 76.9% of supply. Of that, 1.8% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 54.4% in wallets, 20.7% in other contracts. 3,949 holders in total.
FixWatch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

Listed, but not independently verified

QA-IDENTITYListed on CoinGecko as PlayZap (PZP), rank #3393. 3,949 holders.
IssueListed on CoinGecko as PlayZap (PZP), rank #3393. 3,949 holders.
FixMatch the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

The market for this token

QA-MARKETLiquidity $34K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $666K (CoinGecko, all markets, daily snapshot). 24h trading volume $106K (DexScreener, all pools). CoinGecko's record for this coin: all-time high $0.57 on 2023-11-11; the price is now 98.967% below it.
IssueLiquidity $34K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $666K (CoinGecko, all markets, daily snapshot). 24h trading volume $106K (DexScreener, all pools). CoinGecko's record for this coin: all-time high $0.57 on 2023-11-11; the price is now 98.967% below it.
FixSize any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
StatusAcknowledged
Info

Asset class: Project token

QA-PROFILEA token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: a single wallet (EOA). Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $34K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: 710 days of market history.
IssueA token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: a single wallet (EOA). Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $34K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: 710 days of market history.
FixCheck the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
StatusAcknowledged

Category Ratings

TechnicalLow8/10

The PZP contract implements standard ERC-20 functionality and incorporates `ReentrancyGuard` for all privileged fund-out functions, enhancing code security (7.2 Code Security). Access control is managed through `Ownable` and custom `OnlyAdmin`/`HasRole` modifiers (7.3 Access Control). However, the `admin` role has extensive power, including the ability to change the admin address via `changeAdmin` and manage `HasRole` addresses via `grantRole`, `revokeRole`, and `revokeRoleFromAll`. Addresses with `HasRole` can initiate transfers of both native tokens and various ERC-20 tokens from the contract via functions like `DepositReward`, `RewardTransfer`, `ContestReward`, `TransferSwap`, `TransferNative`, and `TransferMultiNative`, centralizing significant control over contract assets (7.1 Architecture).

GovernanceHigh1/10

The contract's economic security is highly dependent on the integrity of the `owner` and `admin` keys. The `admin` can manage who has the `HasRole`, and these `HasRole` addresses possess the capability to move all funds (both native and ERC-20) held by the contract to arbitrary destinations (7.4 Economic). This high degree of centralization represents a single point of failure; a compromise of the `admin` or a `HasRole` address could lead to significant asset loss. The governance model is highly centralized, with no community input or multi-party decision-making for critical operations (7.5 Governance).

UpgradesMedium6/10

The PZP contract is not designed with upgradeability features, as indicated by `is_proxy: false`. This means the contract's logic is immutable once deployed, eliminating risks associated with proxy implementation vulnerabilities or upgrade path issues (7.7 Upgrades). However, it also implies that any future bug fixes or feature enhancements would necessitate a new contract deployment and a migration process for users.

Security Checklist

3/5 checks passed
Contract VerifiedPass
Ownership RenouncedFail
No Mint FunctionPass
Liquidity LockedFail
Not a ProxyPass
HoneypotNoneBuy Tax0.0%Sell Tax0.0%

Holder Composition

76.9% in top 10
54.4% in wallets20.7% in contracts
Effective Concentration62.7%

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Liquidity Depth

$33.8K

The risk score reads depth across every pair. The volume figure and the volume-to-liquidity ratio elsewhere on this page describe only the pair this audit analysed, so the two are not directly comparable.

LP Distribution

Top-1 Unlocked Holder100.0%
Top-3 Unlocked100.0%

Key Addresses

2 addresses
Deployer
0xf25a…3d55
Unlocked LP Held By
0x6af0…6cc2

No privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.

What Raised This Score

4 factors
  • Ownership NOT renounced — the owner keeps admin functions
  • Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool) — held by independent providers — market-depth risk
  • Liquidity < $50k ($33,788 across 1 pairs — thin market)
  • Top-10 concentration > 50% (76.9% total → 62.7% effective; 54.4% in EOAs, 20.7% in contracts; 1.8% burned, locked or in pools excluded)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Related Audits

6 more on the record
o1.exchange (O)Medium Risk人生好物Medium RiskRUNESMedium RiskBaby Ansem (BABYANSEM)Medium RiskEVAAMedium RiskCRYSTAL STONESMedium Risk

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of PLAYZAP?

Our AI-powered scanner gives you a deeper, real-time smart contract analysis — free, with every scoring factor shown.

Get Detailed Audit