The OrderOFT contract implements a cross-chain token bridge using the LayerZero OFT standard. The architecture relies on a UUPS proxy pattern and is managed by a 2-of-3 multisig. The code follows standard library implementations with minimal custom logic, resulting in a robust security posture. One minor rounding issue was identified in the dust removal logic.

On-chain security analysis — is it a scam or legit?
Is Orderly Network Safe?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The OrderOFT contract implements a cross-chain token bridge using the LayerZero OFT standard.
Read the full analysis- Owner can pause all transfers
- Upgradeable proxy — the admin can replace the logic
- Liquidity not locked
- Top-10 concentration > 30%
- Code: Rounding loss in dust removal
- The deployer has launched a honeypot before
Exact factors
- Owner can pause all transfers
- Upgradeable proxy — the admin can replace the logic
- Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool; this pool is 100% of DEX liquidity) — held by independent providers — market-depth risk
- Top-10 concentration > 30% (93.5% total → 31.6% effective; 16.7% in EOAs, 37.2% in contracts; 39.5% burned, locked or in pools excluded)
- Code: Rounding loss in dust removal (Low, static analysis)
- The deployer has launched a honeypot before
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Oct 25Holders
as of audit · Oct 25, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking37.2%
- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell16.7%
- DEX poolsthe pools' own liquidity39.5%
- Everyone else3,279 holders6.5%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 25, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Oct 25The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.
0x46d4…b0f60x9e90…a1710xd2b6…e5750x3361…e9680xd876…92c60x9803…aad90xb116…c2d20x9c87…19da0x69b9…e7340x6844…fa6cNo privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.
Security Findings
HighWhat the token's controller can do
The contract lets its controller — a 2-of-3 multisig — pause all transfers. Nothing independent vouches for whoever holds them, so each is a live risk to holders.QA-POWERS
Issue
The contract lets its controller — a 2-of-3 multisig — pause all transfers. Nothing independent vouches for whoever holds them, so each is a live risk to holders.
Fix
Check who holds these powers and whether a timelock or multisig stands between them and holders.
Status
Acknowledged
MediumLiquidity not locked
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 97.8% is held, unlocked, by 10 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. No single one holds a majority: their exits thin the market rather than hand anyone the pool. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY
Issue
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 97.8% is held, unlocked, by 10 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. No single one holds a majority: their exits thin the market rather than hand anyone the pool. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.
Fix
Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
Status
Acknowledged
LowRounding loss in dust removal
The _removeDust function performs division before multiplication, which can lead to minor precision loss when calculating token amounts.CD-01
Issue
The _removeDust function performs division before multiplication, which can lead to minor precision loss when calculating token amounts.
Fix
Reorder operations to perform multiplication before division to maintain maximum precision.
Status
Unresolved
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 93.5% of supply. Of that, 39.5% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.7% in wallets, 37.2% in other contracts. 3,289 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 93.5% of supply. Of that, 39.5% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.7% in wallets, 37.2% in other contracts. 3,289 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoListed, but not independently verified
Listed on CoinGecko as Orderly (ORDER), market cap $24M, rank #756. 3,289 holders.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
Listed on CoinGecko as Orderly (ORDER), market cap $24M, rank #756. 3,289 holders.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $378K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $314.6M (CoinGecko, all markets, daily snapshot). 24h trading volume $3.3M (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $378K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $314.6M (CoinGecko, all markets, daily snapshot). 24h trading volume $3.3M (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: a 2-of-3 multisig. Code: upgradeable proxy. Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $378K of DEX liquidity across 3 pools. Launch: 570 days of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: a 2-of-3 multisig. Code: upgradeable proxy. Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $378K of DEX liquidity across 3 pools. Launch: 570 days of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 25The architecture utilizes established LayerZero OFT patterns for cross-chain messaging. 7.1 Architecture is modular, separating core logic from proxy storage. 7.2 Code Security is high, leveraging audited OpenZeppelin and LayerZero contracts. 7.3 Access Control is strictly enforced via OwnableUpgradeable, ensuring only authorized multisig signers can modify bridge parameters.
7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance risks are mitigated by the use of a 2-of-3 multisig wallet. The bridge parameters, such as peers and enforced options, are controlled by this multisig. 7.6 External dependencies are limited to the LayerZero endpoint, which is a trusted industry standard.
7.7 Upgrades are handled via the UUPS pattern, which is the current industry standard for gas-efficient and secure proxy upgrades. 7.8 Operations are supported by pause/unpause functionality, allowing the multisig to halt transfers in the event of a detected vulnerability. The implementation is correctly initialized and protected against unauthorized re-initialization.
The protocol demonstrates a high level of security maturity.
We recommend maintaining the current multisig configuration and ensuring that any future upgrades undergo rigorous testing in a staging environment before deployment to mainnet. For the identified rounding issue, ensure that the dust removal logic is consistent across all chains to prevent minor discrepancies in token balances during cross-chain transfers.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Oct 25, 202671High
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Orderly Network?
Our AI-powered scanner gives you a deeper, real-time smart contract analysis — free, with every scoring factor shown.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page