Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
BNB ChainThe contract at 0x679f0211668363cdcea269f9e0375dd0e7f97777 is not verified on the BSC block explorer.
Read the full analysisEach factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 23, 2026
The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are locked or burned.
The contract source code is not verified on the block explorer, making it impossible to audit for malicious logic, backdoors, or vulnerabilities.
Verify the contract source code on the block explorer immediately to provide transparency to users.
Unresolved
The contract is owned by an EOA, allowing the owner to potentially execute privileged functions without community oversight or time-locks.
Transfer ownership to a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized governance contract to mitigate single-point-of-failure risks.
Unresolved
The absence of verified code prevents the community from understanding the tokenomics, tax structures, or potential minting capabilities.
Publish the source code and provide documentation detailing all administrative functions and economic parameters.
Unresolved
The ten largest holders own 80.4% of supply. Of that, 11.2% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 69.2% in wallets, 0.0% in other contracts. 1,385 holders in total.
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Acknowledged
1,385 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Acknowledged
100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is locked in PinkLock02 until 31 Oct 2027 (372 days). Until then nobody — the project included — can withdraw it unless the locker contract itself is flawed; after that date the lock's owner can.
Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
Acknowledged
Liquidity $1.6M (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $247.4M (DexScreener, all pools).
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Acknowledged
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: a single wallet (EOA). Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $1.6M of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Acknowledged
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Acknowledged
The contract at 0x679f0211668363cdcea269f9e0375dd0e7f97777 is not verified on the BSC block explorer. Consequently, the source code is unavailable for security analysis. The contract ownership is held by an EOA (0x34f0...), which presents significant centralization risks as the owner may have the ability to modify token parameters, pause trading, or blacklist addresses.
7.1 Architecture and 7.2 Code Security cannot be assessed due to lack of source code. 7.3 Access Control is likely centralized given the EOA ownership. 7.6 External dependencies and 7.8 Operations remain opaque. Without verification, there is no assurance against malicious backdoors or logic errors.
7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance parameters are hidden from public view. The EOA owner possesses unilateral control over the contract, which is a high-risk configuration for token holders. There is no transparency regarding minting, burning, or tax mechanisms.
7.7 Upgrades are not applicable as the contract is not a proxy. However, the lack of code visibility prevents confirmation of immutability. The contract remains a 'black box' to the community.
Investors should exercise extreme caution as the contract is unverified.
Do not interact with or provide liquidity to this contract until the source code is published and audited by a reputable third party. The centralization of control via an EOA is a major red flag for potential rug-pull scenarios.
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page
