Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
This report is based on a request for a security audit. However, no contract source code was provided for analysis.
Read the full analysisEach factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Sep 5, 2026
The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.
0xdfc3…f2840x1642…95b90xad22…6ec60x1690…1c150x96d0…2d690x02f4…30b50x3864…6d03No privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.
The audit could not proceed with a detailed analysis as no Solidity source code was provided for the contract at address . A comprehensive security assessment requires full access to the contract's implementation details.
Provide the complete and verified Solidity source code for the contract to enable a thorough security audit. Ensure the provided code matches the deployed bytecode.
Unresolved
Effective access control (7.3 Access Control) is fundamental for smart contract security, preventing unauthorized actions and protecting critical functions. Without proper restrictions, malicious actors or unintended operations could compromise the contract's integrity or assets.
Ensure all sensitive functions, such as administrative controls, parameter changes, or asset transfers, are protected by robust access control mechanisms. Utilize established patterns like Ownable, role-based access control (RBAC), or multi-signature wallets for critical operations.
Unresolved
Thorough testing is crucial for identifying and mitigating vulnerabilities before deployment. This includes unit tests, integration tests, and property-based testing to cover various scenarios and edge cases, ensuring the contract behaves as expected under all conditions.
Develop a comprehensive test suite covering all functions, potential attack vectors, and expected user interactions. Utilize tools like Hardhat, Foundry, and fuzzing frameworks to maximize test coverage and identify subtle bugs or vulnerabilities.
Unresolved
For long-lived protocols, a secure and well-managed upgradeability strategy (7.7 Upgrades) is essential. Improperly implemented upgrade mechanisms can introduce critical vulnerabilities, centralize control, or lead to unexpected state corruption.
If upgradeability is desired, implement a battle-tested proxy pattern (e.g., UUPS or Transparent Proxy) with secure access control for upgrade functions, preferably via a multi-signature wallet or decentralized governance. Ensure upgrade logic is thoroughly tested and audited.
Unresolved
This report is based on a request for a security audit. However, no contract source code was provided for analysis. Therefore, a comprehensive security assessment of the contract's specific implementation could not be performed. The findings below are general best practices and an acknowledgment of the missing source code.
Without access to the contract's source code, a detailed technical assessment (7.1 Architecture, 7.2 Code Security) cannot be conducted. General strengths would typically include adherence to established ERC standards and use of battle-tested libraries. Potential issues could involve reentrancy, integer overflows, or logic errors if not properly handled. Robust access control (7.3 Access Control) is crucial for any contract, and its implementation would be a key area of review.
An economic and governance review (7.4 Economic, 7.5 Governance) typically assesses tokenomics, incentive mechanisms, and decision-making processes. Strengths would include transparent governance models and well-defined economic parameters. Potential issues might arise from centralized control, lack of community input, or unforeseen economic attack vectors. External dependencies (7.6 External) like oracles or other protocols would also be scrutinized for their impact on economic stability.
The upgradeability strategy (7.7 Upgrades) is a critical aspect for long-term protocol health. Strengths include well-implemented proxy patterns (e.g., UUPS) with secure upgrade paths and multi-signature control. Potential issues could involve insecure upgrade mechanisms, lack of proper access control for upgrades, or insufficient testing of upgrade logic. Operational aspects (7.8 Operations) related to pausing, emergency shutdowns, and administrative key management are also vital for safe upgrades.
For any smart contract deployment, it is paramount to ensure comprehensive security practices.
This includes rigorous testing, formal verification, and independent security audits of the complete source code. Implement robust access control mechanisms, adhere to established design patterns, and carefully manage all administrative privileges. Plan for potential upgrades with secure, well-tested proxy patterns and ensure transparent governance over critical functions.
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
The Moonbase contract on Base is 0xb200000000000000000000f065aacb72155cc001. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.
Quantum Audit's risk score for Moonbase is 30/100 (Low risk) as of Sep 5, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Liquidity lock: Not locked; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.
Liquidity lock: Not locked (as of Sep 5, 2026). Total DEX liquidity: $134.7K.
As of Sep 5, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 8.3% of the supply. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page
