Base · Smart Contract Security · Updated Jul 24, 2026

Is Coinbase Man Safe? BRIAN

On-chain security analysis — is it a scam or legit?

Contract 0xb200…b301 DexScreener ↗

22 / 100

Medium Risk How is this score calculated? →

Volume 24h

$407.5K

Liquidity

$115.2K

Price

$0.0008293

Token Age

Top 10 Holders

12.5%

Security Checklist

2/5 checks passed

Contract VerifiedPass

Ownership RenouncedUnknown

No Mint FunctionUnknown

Liquidity LockedFail

Not a ProxyPass

Audit History

2 audits on record

Jul 2230Jul 2322

Every audit run adds a dated snapshot — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Audit Summary

This report is based on the provided contract address. No Solidity source code was provided for analysis, therefore a comprehensive security audit could not be performed. The risk assessment is based solely on the absence of code, indicating no identified vulnerabilities due to lack of information.

Final Recommendation: It is strongly recommended to always provide the full Solidity source code for any smart contract intended for deployment or already deployed. A thorough security audit requires access to the complete codebase to identify and mitigate potential vulnerabilities. Without source code, the security posture of the contract remains unknown and unverified.

Category Ratings

TechnicalLow

10/10

No contract source code was provided for technical analysis. Therefore, an assessment of architecture (7.1), code security (7.2), access control (7.3), and external interactions (7.6) could not be performed. Without code, no specific strengths or vulnerabilities can be identified.

GovernanceHigh

3/10

No contract source code was provided, preventing an assessment of economic models (7.4) and governance mechanisms (7.5). Without code, it is impossible to evaluate potential economic exploits or governance centralization risks.

UpgradesMedium

6/10

No contract source code was provided, thus an analysis of upgradeability patterns (7.7) and operational procedures (7.8) could not be conducted. It is unknown if the contract is upgradeable or how its operational parameters are managed.

LP Distribution

Top-1 Unlocked Holder56.7%

Top-3 Unlocked85.6%

What Raised This Score

6 factors

Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
Liquidity not locked, but no owner/deployer address holds LP — market-depth risk, not rug risk
LP top1 unlocked holder = 56.7% (independent LP — depth risk, pool = 29% of DEX liquidity)
LP top3 unlocked holders = 85.6% (independent LP — depth risk, pool = 29% of DEX liquidity)
Token age < 30 days (still settling)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Coinbase Man?

Our AI-powered scanner gives you a deeper, real-time smart contract analysis — free, no signup required.

Get Detailed Audit