Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

On-chain security analysis — is it a scam or legit?

Is Coinbase Man Safe?

BRIANBase
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Sep 4, 2026 · 1 audit on record
SummaryAI Copilot

This report is based on the provided contract address. No Solidity source code was provided for analysis, therefore a comprehensive security audit could not be performed.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • Ownership status UNKNOWN
  • Mint capability UNKNOWN
  • Liquidity not locked, but no owner/deployer address holds LP — market-depth risk, not rug risk
  • LP top1 unlocked holder = 100.0%
  • LP top3 unlocked holders = 100.0%
  • Token age < 30 days
Exact factors
  • Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
  • Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
  • Liquidity not locked, but no owner/deployer address holds LP — market-depth risk, not rug risk
  • LP top1 unlocked holder = 100.0% (independent LP — depth risk, pool = 86% of DEX liquidity)
  • LP top3 unlocked holders = 100.0% (independent LP — depth risk, pool = 86% of DEX liquidity)
  • Token age < 30 days (still settling)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Security Checklist

as of audit · Sep 42 of 5 checks passed
Contract verifiedVerified
OwnershipUnknown
MintUnknown
Liquidity lockNot locked
UpgradeabilityFixed code

Holders

as of audit · Sep 4, 2026
22.2%Contracts7.8%70.0%Everyone else
22.2%Contracts7.8%70.0%Everyone else
ContractsWalletsEveryone elseBubble area = share of supply
30.0%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking22.2%
  • Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell7.8%
  • Everyone elsethe rest of the supply70.0%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads16.7%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Sep 4, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Sep 4$110.3K across 17 pairs
LP tokensNot locked

The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.

Analysed pool$94.7KShare of depth85.9%
Top-1 Unlocked Holder100.0%
Top-3 Unlocked100.0%
Unlocked LP held by
0x575e…fe98

No privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.

Security Findings

1 Info
Info

No issues identified in the reviewed source

The verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.I-01

Issue

The verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.

Fix

Re-check after any contract upgrade or ownership change, both of which can alter behaviour without changing this page.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Sep 4
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

This report is based on the provided contract address. No Solidity source code was provided for analysis, therefore a comprehensive security audit could not be performed. The risk assessment is based solely on the absence of code, indicating no identified vulnerabilities due to lack of information.

Technical10/10Low risk

No contract source code was provided for technical analysis. Therefore, an assessment of architecture (7.1), code security (7.2), access control (7.3), and external interactions (7.6) could not be performed. Without code, no specific strengths or vulnerabilities can be identified.

Governance3/10High risk

No contract source code was provided, preventing an assessment of economic models (7.4) and governance mechanisms (7.5). Without code, it is impossible to evaluate potential economic exploits or governance centralization risks.

Upgrades6/10Medium risk

No contract source code was provided, thus an analysis of upgradeability patterns (7.7) and operational procedures (7.8) could not be conducted. It is unknown if the contract is upgradeable or how its operational parameters are managed.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

It is strongly recommended to always provide the full Solidity source code for any smart contract intended for deployment or already deployed.

A thorough security audit requires access to the complete codebase to identify and mitigate potential vulnerabilities. Without source code, the security posture of the contract remains unknown and unverified.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
Type-
NetworkBase
Token age7d
Contract0xb200…b301
Badge for your website
Coinbase Man security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Sep 4, 202630Low
  2. Jul 23, 202622Low
  3. Jul 22, 202630Low

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the BRIAN contract address?

The Coinbase Man (BRIAN) contract on Base is 0xb2000000000000000000007bf6d5cbb0e24cb301. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.

Is Coinbase Man a scam?

Quantum Audit's risk score for Coinbase Man is 30/100 (Low risk) as of Sep 4, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Liquidity lock: Not locked; Upgradeability: Fixed code. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.

Is BRIAN liquidity locked?

Liquidity lock: Not locked (as of Sep 4, 2026). Total DEX liquidity: $110.3K.

Who holds BRIAN?

As of Sep 4, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 30.0% of the supply. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Coinbase Man?

Our AI-powered scanner gives you a deeper, real-time smart contract analysis — free, with every scoring factor shown.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page