Quantum Audit Logo

Is KittehCoin Safe?

On-chain security analysis — is it a scam or legit?

KittehCoin MEOW
0xb200…6578
Base Not verifiedLast checked 2d ago 1 audit on record
How is this score calculated? → Medium Risk
Executive SummaryAI Copilot

No Solidity source code was provided for analysis of the contract at 0xb200000000000000000000b8d3746d2e56596578. Therefore, a comprehensive security audit could not be performed. The assessment is based solely on the provided metadata, and no specific vulnerabilities can be identified without code access.

1 Informational
Volume 24h
$64.7K
Liquidity
$48.3K
Price
$0.0002558
Token Age
1mo
Top 10 Holders
24.0%

Security Findings

Info

Missing Source Code for Analysis

I-01The Solidity source code for the contract at 0xb200…6578 was not provided. This prevents any form of static or dynamic analysis, making it impossible to identify potential vulnerabilities, assess code quality, or verify adherence to security best practices.
IssueThe Solidity source code for the contract at was not provided. This prevents any form of static or dynamic analysis, making it impossible to identify potential vulnerabilities, assess code quality, or verify adherence to security best practices.
FixProvide the complete and verified Solidity source code for the contract. This should include all imported libraries and dependencies. Verification on block explorers is highly recommended to ensure the deployed bytecode matches the provided source.
StatusUnresolved

Category Ratings

TechnicalLow10/10

No Solidity source code was provided for technical analysis, preventing any assessment of architectural design, code security, or access control mechanisms. Without source code, it is impossible to identify common vulnerabilities such as reentrancy, integer overflows, or logic errors (7.1, 7.2, 7.3). The absence of code means no technical strengths can be identified, and all potential technical risks remain unknown, including interactions with external contracts (7.6).

GovernanceHigh3/10

The economic model and governance mechanisms of the contract could not be evaluated due to the absence of source code. This prevents any assessment of potential economic vulnerabilities, flash loan attack vectors, or the robustness of governance processes (7.4, 7.5). Without code, no economic or governance strengths can be determined, leaving all related risks unverified.

UpgradesMedium6/10

The contract's upgradeability status and associated risks could not be determined without source code. It is unknown if the contract utilizes a proxy pattern (e.g., UUPS, Transparent) or is immutable (7.7). This prevents an assessment of upgrade safety, potential risks associated with future changes, and operational considerations (7.8). No strengths in upgradeability or operations can be identified without code.

Security Checklist

Contract VerifiedPass
Ownership Renounced?
No Mint Function?
Liquidity LockedFail
Not a ProxyPass
HoneypotNoneBuy Tax0.0%Sell Tax0.0%

Holder Composition

4.8% in wallets19.2% in contracts
Effective Concentration12.4%

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Liquidity Depth

Show 4 more pairsShow less

The 3 remaining pairs hold $2 between them and are not listed.

The risk score reads depth across every pair. The volume figure and the volume-to-liquidity ratio elsewhere on this page describe only the pair this audit analysed, so the two are not directly comparable.

LP Distribution

Top-1 Unlocked Holder55.3%
Top-3 Unlocked97.6%

Key Addresses

Unlocked LP Held By
0x76c8…055b0xb1b7…e1410xcc2b…49070x02f4…30b50x3a93…73e70x8a22…6c400x85f9…ea620xd0f5…48170x5a01…a6920xeed6…d767

No privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.

What Raised This Score

  • Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
  • Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
  • Liquidity not locked, but no owner/deployer address holds LP — market-depth risk, not rug risk
  • LP top1 unlocked holder = 55.3% (independent LP — depth risk, pool = 81% of DEX liquidity)
  • LP top3 unlocked holders = 97.6% (independent LP — depth risk, pool = 81% of DEX liquidity)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Related Audits

CLAWNCHMedium RiskAlphabet Inc. (GOOGLC)Medium RiskBankrCoin (BNKR)Medium Risko1.exchange (O)Medium RiskNVIDIA Corporation (NVDAC)Medium RiskSurplus Intelligence (SURPLUS)Medium Risk

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of KittehCoin?

Our AI-powered scanner gives you a deeper, real-time smart contract analysis — free, with every scoring factor shown.

Get Detailed Audit