Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Is Jeeves a Scam?

JVSEthereum
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Nov 4, 2026 · 1 audit on recordNew Launch · 1d old
SummaryAI Copilot

The protocol implements a standard ERC-20 token using a UUPS proxy pattern.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • Upgradeable proxy — the admin can replace the logic
  • 1 proxy upgrade(s) in the last 30 days
  • LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
  • Top-10 concentration > 30%
Exact factors
  • Upgradeable proxy — the admin can replace the logic
  • 1 proxy upgrade(s) in the last 30 days
  • LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
  • Top-10 concentration > 30% (78.3% total → 47.9% effective; 27.5% in EOAs, 50.8% in contracts)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (1d old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.

Security Checklist

as of audit · Nov 45 of 7 checks passed
Contract verifiedVerified
OwnershipRenounced
MintNo mint
Liquidity lockUnknown
UpgradeabilityUpgradeable
HoneypotNone found
Buy / sell tax0% / 0%

Holders

as of audit · Nov 4, 202660 holders
50.8%Contracts27.5%Wallets21.7%Everyone else
50.8%Contracts27.5%Wallets21.7%Everyone else
ContractsWalletsEveryone elseBubble area = share of supply
78.3%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking50.8%
  • Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell27.5%
  • Everyone else50 holders21.7%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads47.9%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Nov 4, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Nov 4$125.6K

The risk score reads depth across every pair.

LP tokensUnknown

Whether the LP tokens are locked could not be determined.

Analysed pool$125.6KShare of depth100.0%

Security Findings

6 Info
Info

No issues identified in the reviewed source

The verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (mint/owner authority, mint capability, holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.I-01

Issue

The verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (mint/owner authority, mint capability, holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.

Fix

Re-check after any contract upgrade or ownership change, both of which can alter behaviour without changing this page.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 78.3% of supply. What remains: 27.5% in wallets, 50.8% in other contracts. 60 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

The ten largest holders own 78.3% of supply. What remains: 27.5% in wallets, 50.8% in other contracts. 60 holders in total.

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Not listed by any independent source

60 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

60 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

The market for this token

Liquidity $126K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $160K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $126K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $160K (DexScreener, all pools).

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Project token

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: nobody (ownership renounced). Code: upgradeable proxy. Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $126K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: 1 days of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: nobody (ownership renounced). Code: upgradeable proxy. Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $126K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: 1 days of market history.

Fix

Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Recently launched — 1 day of market history

The token's oldest DEX pool is 1 day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT

Issue

The token's oldest DEX pool is 1 day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.

Fix

Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Nov 4
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The protocol implements a standard ERC-20 token using a UUPS proxy pattern. Ownership has been formally renounced, effectively locking administrative functions. The codebase follows standard OpenZeppelin patterns, and no critical vulnerabilities were identified in the transfer logic or proxy architecture.

Technical8/10Low risk

The architecture utilizes a robust UUPS proxy pattern (7.1 Architecture) ensuring standard upgradeability. Code security (7.2) is high due to the reliance on audited OpenZeppelin libraries. Access control (7.3) is effectively disabled via ownership renouncement, preventing unauthorized administrative changes. External dependencies (7.6) are limited to standard ERC-20 interfaces.

Governance7/10Low risk

Economic parameters (7.4) are fixed as the contract lacks minting or burning capabilities. Governance (7.5) is non-existent due to the renounced ownership, which prevents any future protocol changes. Operations (7.8) are simplified by the lack of active administrative roles, reducing the attack surface for social engineering.

Upgrades2/10High risk

The UUPS implementation (7.7) is correctly configured to prevent unauthorized upgrades. Since ownership is renounced, the upgrade functionality is effectively dormant. This design choice provides high security by ensuring the contract logic remains immutable moving forward.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

The contract is in a secure, immutable state due to the renounced ownership.

No further action is required for the current deployment. Future interactions should focus on monitoring the proxy implementation address for any unexpected changes, though this is prevented by the current configuration.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
TypeERC1967Proxy
NetworkEthereum
Token age1d
Contract0x9b3b…c930
Deployer0x269e…0b9a
Proxy Upgrade Controls
Proxy TypeEip1967 Uups
ImplementationVerified source
Upgrades (30d)1
Badge for your website
Jeeves security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Nov 4, 202652Medium

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the JVS contract address?

The Jeeves (JVS) contract on Ethereum is 0x9b3bc7db5dbf2434df08410adbe88b3b8802c930. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.

Is Jeeves a scam?

Quantum Audit's risk score for Jeeves is 52/100 (Medium risk) as of Nov 4, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Ownership: Renounced; Mint: No mint; Upgradeability: Upgradeable; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.

Who holds JVS?

As of Nov 4, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 78.3% of the supply across 60 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Jeeves?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified