Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

On-chain security analysis — is it a scam or legit?

Is Instadapp (PoS) Safe?

INSTPolygon
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Oct 29, 2026 · 1 audit on record
SummaryAI Copilot

The UChildERC20 contract serves as a bridge-compatible token implementation on Polygon.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
  • Upgradeable proxy — the admin can replace the logic
  • Non-standard proxy
  • Ownership status UNKNOWN
  • Liquidity not locked
  • Code: Locked Native Tokens
Exact factors
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
  • Upgradeable proxy — the admin can replace the logic
  • Non-standard proxy (opaque upgrade path)
  • Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
  • Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool; this pool is 99% of DEX liquidity) — who holds it cannot be verified
  • Code: Locked Native Tokens (Medium, static analysis)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Security Checklist

as of audit · Oct 293 of 7 checks passed
Contract verifiedVerified
OwnershipUnknown
MintMintable
Liquidity lockNot locked
UpgradeabilityUpgradeable
HoneypotNone found
Buy / sell tax0% / 0%

Holders

as of audit · Oct 29, 20264,516 holders
15.6%Contracts7.3%Wallets57.6%DEX pools19.5%Everyone else
15.6%Contracts7.3%57.6%DEX pools19.5%Everyone else
ContractsWalletsDEX poolsEveryone elseBubble area = share of supply
80.5%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking15.6%
  • Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell7.3%
  • DEX poolsthe pools' own liquidity57.6%
  • Everyone else4,506 holders19.5%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads13.5%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 29, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Oct 29$751.9K across 13 pairs
LP tokensNot locked

The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.

Analysed pool$744.5KShare of depth99.0%
Top-1 Unlocked Holder99.6%
Top-3 Unlocked100.0%
Unlocked LP held by
0x362d…79940x55e9…f8000xddc7…471c0xa96c…2e8e0x86a0…e0720xdc09…e8d80x994f…2e700x8c76…b1c90x482b…5c290x3241…8da6

Security Findings

3 Medium4 Info
Medium

Locked Native Tokens

The contract can receive native tokens (ETH/MATIC) but lacks any function to withdraw them. Any funds sent to the contract address will be permanently locked.CD-01

Issue

The contract can receive native tokens (ETH/MATIC) but lacks any function to withdraw them. Any funds sent to the contract address will be permanently locked.

Fix

Implement a withdrawal function restricted to the contract owner to allow for the recovery of accidentally sent native assets.

Status

Unresolved

Medium

Centralized Minting Authority

The deposit function allows a privileged address to mint new tokens at will. This increases the total supply and can dilute the value of existing holdings if the privileged account is compromised.CP-01

Issue

The deposit function allows a privileged address to mint new tokens at will. This increases the total supply and can dilute the value of existing holdings if the privileged account is compromised.

Fix

Restrict the DEPOSITOR_ROLE to a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized governance contract to prevent single-point-of-failure risks.

Status

Unresolved

Medium

Liquidity not locked

0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 2 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a contract, 0x362d…7994 — holds 99.6% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY

Issue

0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 2 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a contract, 0x362d…7994 — holds 99.6% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.

Fix

Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 80.5% of supply. Of that, 57.6% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 7.3% in wallets, 15.6% in other contracts. 4,516 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

The ten largest holders own 80.5% of supply. Of that, 57.6% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 7.3% in wallets, 15.6% in other contracts. 4,516 holders in total.

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Identity verified by independent sources

Listed on CoinGecko as Fluid (FLUID), market cap $177M, rank #191. 4,516 holders. Verified by: CoinGecko.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

Listed on CoinGecko as Fluid (FLUID), market cap $177M, rank #191. 4,516 holders. Verified by: CoinGecko.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

The market for this token

Liquidity $752K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $1.7M (CoinGecko, all markets, daily snapshot). 24h trading volume $42K (DexScreener, all pools). CoinGecko's record for this coin: all-time high $24.40 on 2021-06-16; the price is now 91.3328% below it.QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $752K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $1.7M (CoinGecko, all markets, daily snapshot). 24h trading volume $42K (DexScreener, all pools). CoinGecko's record for this coin: all-time high $24.40 on 2021-06-16; the price is now 91.3328% below it.

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Project token

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: upgradeable proxy. Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $752K of DEX liquidity across 13 pools. Launch: 1961 days of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: upgradeable proxy. Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $752K of DEX liquidity across 13 pools. Launch: 1961 days of market history.

Fix

Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 29
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The UChildERC20 contract serves as a bridge-compatible token implementation on Polygon. The architecture relies on standard OpenZeppelin-style access control and ERC20 logic. While the core token functionality is robust, the contract includes privileged minting capabilities and lacks a mechanism to recover accidentally sent ETH, which are common patterns for bridge-linked assets but introduce specific trust requirements.

Technical7/10Low risk

The contract utilizes well-audited OpenZeppelin libraries for ERC20 and AccessControl, ensuring standard compliance. 7.1 Architecture follows a proxy pattern for upgradeability, while 7.2 Code Security is maintained through standard state-changing patterns. 7.3 Access Control is correctly implemented using roles, though 7.6 External interactions are limited to bridge-specific minting/burning logic.

Governance1/10High risk

7.4 Economic risk is primarily driven by the centralized minting authority, which can impact token supply. 7.5 Governance is handled via role-based access control, allowing for granular permission management. The system relies on the security of the bridge operator to prevent unauthorized inflation.

Upgrades1/10High risk

7.7 Upgrades are managed via a proxy pattern, allowing for logic updates without state migration. 7.8 Operations are stable, with no complex logic dependencies that would complicate future upgrades. The implementation is isolated from the proxy storage, minimizing risks during potential transitions.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

The protocol should implement a 'rescue' function to allow the recovery of accidentally sent native tokens (ETH/MATIC) to the contract address.

Additionally, ensure that the DEPOSITOR_ROLE is held by a multi-signature wallet or a time-locked governance contract to mitigate the risk of unauthorized minting events.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
TypeUChildERC20Proxy
NetworkPolygon
Token age5y
Contract0xf50d…7dee
Deployer0x63ec…7313
Proxy Upgrade Controls
Proxy TypeEtherscan Detected Custom
ImplementationVerified source
Upgrades (30d)0 · stable
Badge for your website
Instadapp (PoS) security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Oct 29, 202641Medium

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the INST contract address?

The Instadapp (PoS) (INST) contract on Polygon is 0xf50d05a1402d0adafa880d36050736f9f6ee7dee. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.

Is Instadapp (PoS) a scam?

Quantum Audit's risk score for Instadapp (PoS) is 41/100 (Medium risk) as of Oct 29, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Mint: Mintable; Liquidity lock: Not locked; Upgradeability: Upgradeable; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.

Is INST liquidity locked?

Liquidity lock: Not locked (as of Oct 29, 2026). Total DEX liquidity: $751.9K.

Who holds INST?

As of Oct 29, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 80.5% of the supply across 4,516 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of Instadapp (PoS)?

Our AI-powered scanner gives you a deeper, real-time smart contract analysis — free, with every scoring factor shown.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified