On-chain security analysis — is it a scam or legit?
PolygonThe Auralith contract is a standard ERC-20 token with burn capabilities.
Read the full analysisEach factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 20, 2026
The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are locked or burned.
0xc6ae…f70aNo privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.
The mint(address,uint256) function allows a designated governance address to create an unlimited number of new tokens. This can be used to dilute the value of existing holdings at any time.
Implement a hard cap on the total supply or transition the governance role to a multi-signature wallet to require community approval for any new minting events.
Unresolved
The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 30.6% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 0.0% in wallets, 69.4% in other contracts. 2,711 holders in total.
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Acknowledged
2,711 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Acknowledged
100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% of the LP tokens were sent to a burn address — that liquidity can never be withdrawn by anyone. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.
Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
Acknowledged
Liquidity $1.5M (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $119K (DexScreener, all pools).
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Acknowledged
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: nobody (ownership renounced). Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: 0% on buy, 5% on sell. Market: $1.5M of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: 116 days of market history.
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Acknowledged
The Auralith contract is a standard ERC-20 token with burn capabilities. Ownership has been renounced, preventing further administrative changes to the contract's core settings. However, a governance-controlled minting function remains active, which poses a centralization risk regarding token supply inflation.
The contract utilizes standard OpenZeppelin ERC-20 implementations, ensuring robust and battle-tested code. 7.1 Architecture is clean and follows standard patterns. 7.2 Code Security is high due to the use of modern Solidity 0.8.x, which prevents integer overflows. 7.3 Access Control is correctly implemented for the minting function.
7.4 Economic risks are centered on the minting capability held by the governance address. 7.5 Governance is centralized, as the minting authority is not restricted by a timelock or multi-sig requirement. This allows for potential supply dilution without community oversight.
7.7 Upgrades are not applicable as the contract is not a proxy. The logic is immutable. 7.8 Operations are stable due to the renounced ownership of administrative functions.
To mitigate the centralization risk, it is recommended to transition the governance role to a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized DAO structure.
This ensures that any future minting events require consensus rather than a single point of failure.
Our AI-powered scanner gives you a deeper, real-time smart contract analysis — free, with every scoring factor shown.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page
