On-chain security analysis — is it a scam or legit?
PolygonThe GreenMetaverseToken is a standard ERC-20 implementation with burnable capabilities.
Read the full analysisEach factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 29, 2026
The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.
0x41e4…ac840x0180…69a90xe8df…8da30x6294…1c0c0xf139…b71c0x369b…cd7b0xda22…cd2a0x8aeb…7f2d0xb540…95b70x0eca…6b48No privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.
The owner of the contract has the ability to call the mint function, which creates new tokens and increases the total supply. This action dilutes the value of existing tokens held by users.
Implement a timelock on the mint function or renounce the minting authority if the total supply is intended to be fixed. If minting is required, ensure all minting events are publicly announced and documented.
Unresolved
0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 7 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a wallet, 0x41e4…ac84 — holds 70.5% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.
Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
Acknowledged
Liquidity $1.1M (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $3.6M (CoinGecko, all markets, daily snapshot). 24h trading volume $36K (DexScreener, all pools). CoinGecko's record for this coin: all-time high $4.11 on 2022-04-27; the price is now 99.8309% below it.
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Acknowledged
The ten largest holders own 93.2% of supply. What remains: 86.9% in wallets, 6.4% in other contracts. 46,432 holders in total.
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Acknowledged
Listed on CoinGecko as GMT (GMT), market cap $22M, rank #794. Traded on Binance. 46,432 holders. Verified by: CoinGecko, exchange listings.
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Acknowledged
A token whose main use is voting on a protocol's decisions (delegation and vote checkpoints in its code). The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: CoinGecko category: Gaming Governance Token. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a 3-of-4 multisig. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $1.1M of DEX liquidity across 7 pools. Launch: 1147 days of market history.
Check how much of the voting supply insiders hold and what governance can change.
Acknowledged
The GreenMetaverseToken is a standard ERC-20 implementation with burnable capabilities. The contract is managed by a 3-of-4 multisig wallet, providing a robust layer of operational security. The primary risk identified is the centralized minting authority, which allows the owner to increase the total supply at will.
The contract utilizes standard OpenZeppelin libraries for ERC-20 and Ownable functionality, ensuring 7.1 Architecture and 7.2 Code Security standards are met. 7.3 Access Control is correctly implemented via the onlyOwner modifier on sensitive functions. 7.6 External dependencies are minimal and well-vetted, reducing the attack surface for external exploits.
7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance risks are centered on the minting authority held by the multisig. While the 3-of-4 multisig structure provides 7.8 Operations security, the ability to mint tokens creates a potential for supply dilution. Governance is centralized, relying entirely on the integrity of the multisig signers.
The contract is not upgradeable, eliminating 7.7 Upgrades risks associated with proxy patterns. The logic is immutable, ensuring that the current token behavior cannot be altered by the owner. This provides long-term predictability for token holders.
To mitigate the risk of supply dilution, it is recommended to implement a timelock controller for the minting function.
This would ensure that any increase in total supply is subject to a mandatory delay, providing transparency and an opportunity for the community to react to changes in tokenomics. Furthermore, the multisig signers should maintain strict operational security protocols for their private keys. Given the centralization of the minting power, the project should consider transitioning to a decentralized governance model if the token supply is intended to be expanded significantly in the future.
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Our AI-powered scanner gives you a deeper, real-time smart contract analysis — free, with every scoring factor shown.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified
