Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

On-chain security analysis — is it a scam or legit?

Is AS Token Safe?

ASPolygon
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Oct 20, 2026 · 1 audit on record
SummaryAI Copilot

The AS token is a standard ERC-20 implementation with integrated access control and fee management.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • Hidden owner — control survives an apparent renounce
  • Owner can change the buy/sell tax
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
  • Ownership status UNKNOWN
  • Top-10 concentration > 30%
Exact factors
  • Hidden owner — control survives an apparent renounce
  • Owner can change the buy/sell tax
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
  • Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
  • Top-10 concentration > 30% (94.9% total → 32.9% effective; 0.0% in EOAs, 82.2% in contracts; 12.7% burned, locked or in pools excluded)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Security Checklist

as of audit · Oct 204 of 7 checks passed
Contract verifiedVerified
OwnershipUnknown
MintMintable
Liquidity lockLocked
UpgradeabilityFixed code
HoneypotNone found
Buy / sell tax0% / 3%

Holders

as of audit · Oct 20, 2026405,849 holders
82.2%Contracts6.6%6.1%5.1%
82.2%Contracts6.6%6.1%5.1%
ContractsBurnedDEX poolsEveryone elseBubble area = share of supply
94.9%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking82.2%
  • Burnedout of circulation6.6%
  • DEX poolsthe pools' own liquidity6.1%
  • Everyone else405,839 holders5.1%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads32.9%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 20, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Oct 20$6.68M across 3 pairs
LP tokensLocked

The LP tokens of the analysed pool are locked or burned.

Analysed pool$6.68MShare of depth100.0%
LP Burned100.0% · ≈ permanent lock
LP Locked100.0%
Unlocked LP held by
0x6a92…b26e0xdfe7…24190x0232…69590x11eb…0da60x9808…33480x8927…71300xeb35…d26f0xd452…ef220x6acd…2fe0

A privileged address — the deployer, the owner, or the token contract itself — is among these holders, so that party can withdraw liquidity.

Security Findings

3 Medium4 Info
Medium

Centralized Minting Authority

The mint function allows a privileged vault address to create new tokens at will, which can dilute the value of existing holdings. This function is restricted to the vault role.CP-01

Issue

The mint function allows a privileged vault address to create new tokens at will, which can dilute the value of existing holdings. This function is restricted to the vault role.

Fix

Implement a hard cap on the total supply or require a multi-signature approval process for minting events to protect token holders from unexpected dilution.

Status

Unresolved

Medium

Administrative Fee Manipulation

The setRatio function allows administrators to change transfer fees dynamically. This grants the controller the ability to significantly alter the cost of moving tokens.CP-07

Issue

The setRatio function allows administrators to change transfer fees dynamically. This grants the controller the ability to significantly alter the cost of moving tokens.

Fix

Set a maximum fee limit in the contract to prevent administrators from setting confiscatory fee rates, and document the fee policy clearly for users.

Status

Unresolved

Medium

The market for this token

Liquidity $6.7M (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $151K (CoinGecko, all markets, daily snapshot). 24h trading volume $130K (DexScreener, all pools). CoinGecko's record for this coin: all-time high $27.90 on 2025-08-05; the price is now 99.3335% below it.QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $6.7M (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $151K (CoinGecko, all markets, daily snapshot). 24h trading volume $130K (DexScreener, all pools). CoinGecko's record for this coin: all-time high $27.90 on 2025-08-05; the price is now 99.3335% below it.

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 94.9% of supply. Of that, 6.6% burned, 6.1% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 0.0% in wallets, 82.2% in other contracts. 405,849 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

The ten largest holders own 94.9% of supply. Of that, 6.6% burned, 6.1% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 0.0% in wallets, 82.2% in other contracts. 405,849 holders in total.

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Listed, but not independently verified

Listed on CoinGecko as AKAS (AS). 405,849 holders.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

Listed on CoinGecko as AKAS (AS). 405,849 holders.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Liquidity burned — cannot be withdrawn

100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% of the LP tokens were sent to a burn address — that liquidity can never be withdrawn by anyone.QA-LIQUIDITY

Issue

100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% of the LP tokens were sent to a burn address — that liquidity can never be withdrawn by anyone.

Fix

Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Project token

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: 0% on buy, 3% on sell. Market: $6.7M of DEX liquidity across 3 pools. Launch: 495 days of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: an owner that could not be resolved. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: 0% on buy, 3% on sell. Market: $6.7M of DEX liquidity across 3 pools. Launch: 495 days of market history.

Fix

Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 20
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The AS token is a standard ERC-20 implementation with integrated access control and fee management. The protocol relies on centralized administrative roles to manage supply and transfer parameters. While the code is clean and follows standard patterns, the high degree of centralization poses a risk to token holders.

Technical8/10Low risk

The architecture utilizes standard OpenZeppelin libraries for ERC-20 and AccessControl, ensuring 7.1 Architecture and 7.2 Code Security standards are met. 7.3 Access Control is implemented via roles, though it centralizes power. 7.6 External dependencies are minimal and well-vetted. The code is readable and follows modern Solidity practices.

Governance3/10High risk

7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance aspects are heavily centralized. The ability to mint tokens and adjust fees allows administrators to significantly impact token value. There are no on-chain governance mechanisms to limit these administrative powers. Users must trust the entity holding the default admin and vault roles.

Upgrades4/10Medium risk

7.7 Upgrades are not currently implemented as the contract is not a proxy. 7.8 Operations are straightforward, relying on standard ERC-20 functionality. No complex upgrade logic exists to introduce hidden risks. The contract is immutable in its current deployment state.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

The protocol should consider implementing a timelock for sensitive administrative functions like minting or fee adjustments to provide transparency and protection for token holders.

Additionally, transitioning to a multi-signature wallet for the default admin role would mitigate the risk of a single point of failure.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
TypeVault, Token
NetworkPolygon
Token age1y
Contract0x6a92…b26e
Deployer0xe335…411b
Audit History
  1. Oct 20, 202654Medium

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of AS Token?

Our AI-powered scanner gives you a deeper, real-time smart contract analysis — free, with every scoring factor shown.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page