Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Is GREEN MORNING a Scam?

BNB Chain

Not verified

This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →

Last checked Nov 7, 2026 · 1 audit on recordNew Launch · 5h old

Chart

75/ 100

High RiskHow is this score calculated?

How the score breaks downratings: 10 is safest

Technical6/10 Governance1/10 Upgrades6/10 Checks passed4 of 7 Findings1 Critical · 1 High · 6 Info8

SummaryAI Copilot

The contract at the provided address is not verified on the block explorer, making it impossible to perform a static analysis of the source code.

Read the full analysis

What raised the score

Mint capability UNKNOWN
Volume/Liquidity > 15×
Top-10 concentration > 70%
Contract source not verified — its logic cannot be read

Exact factors

Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
Volume/Liquidity > 15× (150.7× — wash-trading signal)
Top-10 concentration > 70% (80.4% total → 79.0% effective; 79.0% in EOAs, 0.0% in contracts; 1.4% burned, locked or in pools excluded)
Contract source NOT verified — its logic cannot be read

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (5h old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.

Security Checklist

as of audit · Nov 74 of 7 checks passed

Contract verifiedNot verified

OwnershipRetained

MintUnknown

Liquidity lockLocked

UpgradeabilityFixed code

HoneypotNone found

Buy / sell tax0% / 0%

Holders

as of audit · Nov 7, 20261,382 holders

WalletsDEX poolsEveryone elseBubble area = share of supply

80.4%of supply sits with the top 10 holders

Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell79.0%
DEX poolsthe pools' own liquidity1.4%
Everyone else1,372 holders19.6%

Effective concentrationwhat the score reads79.0%

How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Nov 7, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Nov 7$1.60M

The risk score reads depth across every pair.

LP tokensLocked

The LP tokens of the analysed pool are locked or burned.

Analysed pool$1.60MShare of depth100.0%

LP Locked100.0% · Null Address, PinkLock02

Security Findings

1 Critical1 High6 Info

Critical

Unverified Source Code

The contract source code is not published on the block explorer, preventing any security audit or verification of contract logic.C-01

Issue

The contract source code is not published on the block explorer, preventing any security audit or verification of contract logic.

Fix

Publish and verify the source code on the block explorer to allow for community and security review.

Status

Unresolved

High

Centralized Ownership via EOA

The contract is owned by an EOA and ownership has not been renounced, granting the owner full control over administrative functions.H-01

Issue

The contract is owned by an EOA and ownership has not been renounced, granting the owner full control over administrative functions.

Fix

Renounce ownership or transfer control to a time-locked multi-sig contract to improve decentralization and security.

Status

Unresolved

Info

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 80.4% of supply. Of that, 1.4% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 79.0% in wallets, 0.0% in other contracts. 1,382 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Not listed by any independent source

1,382 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

1,382 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Liquidity time-locked

100.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is locked in PinkLock02 until 30 Nov 2027 (387 days). Until then nobody — the project included — can withdraw it unless the locker contract itself is flawed; after that date the lock's owner can.QA-LIQUIDITY

Issue

Fix

Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

The market for this token

Liquidity $1.6M (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $240.5M (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $1.6M (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $240.5M (DexScreener, all pools).

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Project token

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mint capability could not be read. Control: a single wallet (EOA). Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $1.6M of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

Fix

Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Recently launched — less than a day of market history

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT

Issue

Fix

Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Nov 7

Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The contract at the provided address is not verified on the block explorer, making it impossible to perform a static analysis of the source code. The contract is controlled by an EOA (Externally Owned Account) and ownership has not been renounced, presenting significant centralization risks. Investors should exercise extreme caution as the lack of transparency prevents verification of tax mechanisms, minting capabilities, or liquidity lock status.

Technical6/10Medium risk

The source code is unavailable for inspection, preventing assessment of 7.1 Architecture and 7.2 Code Security. Without verification, it is impossible to confirm the presence of standard ERC-20 functions or potential backdoors. 7.3 Access Control cannot be validated, leaving the contract logic opaque to the user.

Governance1/10High risk

The contract is controlled by an EOA, which poses a high risk regarding 7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance parameters. Without source code, 7.6 External dependencies and potential hidden tax mechanisms remain unknown. The lack of renounced ownership allows the owner to potentially modify tokenomics or restrict trading at will.

Upgrades6/10Medium risk

The contract is not identified as a proxy, but 7.7 Upgrades and 7.8 Operations cannot be verified without source code. There is no guarantee that the contract is immutable. Users should assume the highest level of risk regarding potential logic changes.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

Do not interact with this contract. The lack of source code verification is a major red flag that prevents any meaningful security assessment.

Without the ability to audit the code, there is no protection against malicious functions such as honeypots, blacklisting, or unauthorized minting. If you are considering an investment, wait for the developer to verify the source code on the block explorer. Verify that the ownership has been renounced or transferred to a secure multi-sig wallet, and ensure that liquidity is locked in a reputable, audited protocol.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record

Type-

NetworkBNB Chain

Token age5h

Contract0xdb5f…7777

Deployer0x4b45…2dc7

Badge for your website

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History

Nov 7, 202675High

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the GM contract address?

The GREEN MORNING (GM) contract on BNB Chain is 0xdb5fa98738c5261f15a76a942c7f2bee392e7777. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.