Is FXN Token (FXN) Safe? Smart Contract Security Analysis

Security Findings

0 total

Info

No issues identified in the reviewed source

I-01The verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (mint capability, holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.

IssueThe verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (mint capability, holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.

FixRe-check after any contract upgrade or ownership change, both of which can alter behaviour without changing this page.

StatusAcknowledged

Category Ratings

TechnicalLow7/10

GovernanceHigh2/10

UpgradesHigh1/10

Security Checklist

1/5 checks passed

Contract VerifiedPass

Ownership Renounced?

No Mint FunctionFail

Liquidity LockedFail

Not a ProxyFail

HoneypotNoneBuy Tax0.0%Sell Tax0.0%

Proxy Upgrade Controls

Proxy TypeEtherscan Detected Custom

ImplementationVerified source

Upgrades (30d)0 · stable

Holder Composition

92.7% in top 10

0.8% in wallets91.9% in contracts

Effective Concentration37.5%

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Liquidity Depth

$1.77M across 2 pairs

CurveWETHanalysed$1.77M Uniswap v3WETH$111

The risk score reads depth across every pair. The volume figure and the volume-to-liquidity ratio elsewhere on this page describe only the pair this audit analysed, so the two are not directly comparable.

LP Distribution

Top-1 Unlocked Holder100.0%

Top-3 Unlocked100.0%

Key Addresses

2 addresses

Deployer

0xa1d0…a468

Unlocked LP Held By

0xf320…06de

No privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.

What Raised This Score

8 factors

Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
Proxy contract (upgradeable — admin can replace logic)
Non-standard proxy storage (Etherscan-confirmed)
Top-10 concentration > 30% (92.7% total → 37.5% effective; 0.8% in EOAs, 91.9% in contracts — moderate)
Liquidity not locked, but no owner/deployer address holds LP — market-depth risk, not rug risk
LP top1 unlocked holder = 100.0% (independent LP — depth risk)
LP top3 unlocked holders = 100.0% (independent LP — depth risk)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Security Analysis

FXN Token (FXN) is a token on Ethereum. Our automated on-chain security scanner assigned it a risk score of 51/100, classified as High Risk. The contract source code is open-source and verified on the blockchain explorer. Contract ownership has not been renounced, and the contract includes a mint function. Liquidity does not appear to be locked. These factors are weighted to produce the overall risk classification.

Key signals investors should consider: the top 10 wallets hold 92.7% of the supply, which indicates concentrated ownership — a common risk factor. As with any new token, on-chain data can change rapidly. Always verify contract details independently on a block explorer and conduct your own research before making any investment decisions.

Not Signed In

Is FXN Token Safe?