Is CreditStrategy (CREDITSTR) a Scam? New Token Security Check

Security Findings

0 total

Info

No issues identified in the reviewed source

I-01The verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (mint/owner authority, mint capability, holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.

IssueThe verified source code was reviewed and no issue rising to Informational severity or above was identified. This is a statement about the code that was read, not a guarantee: the review covers the published source only. Fact-layer checks (mint/owner authority, mint capability, holder concentration) were applied separately and feed the risk score.

FixRe-check after any contract upgrade or ownership change, both of which can alter behaviour without changing this page.

StatusAcknowledged

Category Ratings

TechnicalLow8/10

GovernanceHigh1/10

UpgradesHigh1/10

Security Checklist

2/5 checks passed

Contract VerifiedPass

Ownership RenouncedFail

No Mint FunctionPass

Liquidity LockedFail

Not a ProxyFail

HoneypotNoneBuy Tax0.0%Sell Tax0.0%

Proxy Upgrade Controls

Proxy TypeEip1967 Uups

ImplementationVerified source

Upgrades (30d)0 · stable

Holder Composition

37.4% in top 10

15.6% in wallets21.8% in contracts

Effective Concentration24.3%

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Liquidity Depth

$608.6K across 4 pairs

Uniswap v4ETHanalysed$607.7K Uniswap v4USDC$600 Uniswap v4USDC$299

The risk score reads depth across every pair. The volume figure and the volume-to-liquidity ratio elsewhere on this page describe only the pair this audit analysed, so the two are not directly comparable.

Key Addresses

1 addresses

Deployer

0x0198…e8cb

What Raised This Score

5 factors

Ownership NOT renounced — owner is an EOA (single private key)
Proxy contract (upgradeable — admin can replace logic)
Top-10 concentration > 20% (37.4% total → 24.3% effective; 15.6% in EOAs, 21.8% in contracts — mild)
Liquidity NOT locked (owner can withdraw — rug-pull risk)
Token age < 24h (brand new — bot activity, unproven)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Security Analysis

CreditStrategy (CREDITSTR) is a token on Ethereum. Our automated on-chain security scanner assigned it a risk score of 51/100, classified as High Risk. The contract source code is open-source and verified on the blockchain explorer. Contract ownership has not been renounced, and the contract does not have a mint function. Liquidity does not appear to be locked. These factors are weighted to produce the overall risk classification.

Key signals investors should consider: the top 10 wallets hold 37.4% of the supply, which suggests a relatively distributed token supply. As with any new token, on-chain data can change rapidly. Always verify contract details independently on a block explorer and conduct your own research before making any investment decisions.

Not Signed In

Is CreditStrategy a Scam?