LaunchToken is an EIP-1167 minimal clone implementation of an ERC-20 token. The contract includes centralized administrative controls that allow a designated minter to mint tokens, block specific addresses, and toggle global transfer restrictions. While the core ERC-20 logic follows standard patterns, the presence of these privileged functions introduces significant centralization risk for token holders.
Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is AGENT ID a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →LaunchToken is an EIP-1167 minimal clone implementation of an ERC-20 token.
Read the full analysis- A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through; held by minter: Other-Contract
- Owner can blacklist or freeze individual holders; held by minter: Other-Contract
- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded; held by minter: Other-Contract
- Liquidity < $50k
- Volume/Liquidity > 10×
Exact factors
- A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through; held by minter: Other-Contract
- Owner can blacklist or freeze individual holders; held by minter: Other-Contract
- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded; held by minter: Other-Contract
- Liquidity < $50k ($26,083 across 1 pairs — thin market)
- Volume/Liquidity > 10× (13.8× — possible wash trading)
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Nov 1Holders
as of audit · Nov 1, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking3.9%
- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell9.2%
- Burnedout of circulation24.7%
- DEX poolsthe pools' own liquidity22.8%
- Everyone else672 holders39.4%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Nov 1, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Nov 1The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are locked or burned.
0x0ed9…9706No privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.
Security Findings
MediumCentralized Minting Authority
The minter address has the ability to create new tokens at will, up to a defined maximum supply. This allows the controller to dilute the holdings of all existing token holders.CP-01
Issue
The minter address has the ability to create new tokens at will, up to a defined maximum supply. This allows the controller to dilute the holdings of all existing token holders.
Fix
Restrict the minting capability to a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized governance contract to prevent unilateral supply inflation.
Status
Unresolved
MediumGlobal Transfer Restriction Switch
The minter can trigger a function to disable transfers globally. This effectively freezes the token's liquidity and prevents users from moving or selling their assets.CP-05
Issue
The minter can trigger a function to disable transfers globally. This effectively freezes the token's liquidity and prevents users from moving or selling their assets.
Fix
Remove the ability to globally disable transfers or implement a timelock that notifies the community before such a drastic action is taken.
Status
Unresolved
MediumAddress Blacklisting Capability
The minter can add specific addresses to a blacklist, preventing those users from transferring or selling their tokens. This creates a risk of censorship and loss of access to funds for targeted users.CP-06
Issue
The minter can add specific addresses to a blacklist, preventing those users from transferring or selling their tokens. This creates a risk of censorship and loss of access to funds for targeted users.
Fix
Limit the use of blacklisting to specific regulatory compliance scenarios and ensure the process is transparent and auditable.
Status
Unresolved
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 60.6% of supply. Of that, 24.7% burned, 22.8% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 9.2% in wallets, 3.9% in other contracts. 682 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 60.6% of supply. Of that, 24.7% burned, 22.8% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 9.2% in wallets, 3.9% in other contracts. 682 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
682 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
682 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoLiquidity burned — cannot be withdrawn
99.8% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 99.8% of the LP tokens were sent to a burn address — that liquidity can never be withdrawn by anyone. 0.2% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. No single one holds a majority: their exits thin the market rather than hand anyone the pool.QA-LIQUIDITY
Issue
99.8% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 99.8% of the LP tokens were sent to a burn address — that liquidity can never be withdrawn by anyone. 0.2% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. No single one holds a majority: their exits thin the market rather than hand anyone the pool.
Fix
Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $26K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $361K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $26K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $361K (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: minter — a contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: 2% on buy, 2% on sell. Market: $26K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: minter — a contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: 2% on buy, 2% on sell. Market: $26K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — less than a day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Nov 1The contract utilizes standard OpenZeppelin-style ERC-20 logic, ensuring compatibility with common DeFi protocols. 7.1 Architecture is based on a secure EIP-1167 clone pattern, while 7.2 Code Security is maintained through standard state updates. 7.3 Access Control is strictly enforced via the onlyMinter modifier, though this creates a single point of failure. 7.6 External interactions are minimal, reducing the attack surface for flash loan or reentrancy exploits.
The economic model is heavily centralized, granting the minter total control over supply and liquidity access. 7.4 Economic stability is subject to the minter's discretion regarding supply inflation and transfer restrictions. 7.5 Governance is non-existent, as all privileged actions are performed by a single address without community oversight. This structure allows the minter to unilaterally alter the token's utility and market availability.
The contract is deployed as an EIP-1167 minimal clone, which is immutable by design. 7.7 Upgrades are not possible, as the implementation logic is hardcoded into the proxy's bytecode. This eliminates the risk of malicious logic updates or proxy hijacking. 7.8 Operations are stable due to this permanent, non-upgradeable architecture.
Investors should be aware that the minter role holds absolute authority over the token's supply and transferability.
It is recommended to transition the minter role to a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized governance contract to mitigate the risk of a single compromised key. Additionally, consider implementing a timelock for sensitive operations like blocking addresses or disabling transfers to provide transparency and a window for community response. Ensure that the minter address is secured with robust institutional-grade custody solutions.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Nov 1, 202653Medium
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the AID contract address?
The AGENT ID (AID) contract on BNB Chain is 0xa691cbfe81d3b8708f89889d3cdfb8796ddf67fe. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.
Is AGENT ID a scam?
Quantum Audit's risk score for AGENT ID is 53/100 (Medium risk) as of Nov 1, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Ownership: Retained; Mint: Mintable; Liquidity lock: Locked; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 2% / 2%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.
Is AID liquidity locked?
Liquidity lock: Locked (as of Nov 1, 2026). Total DEX liquidity: $26.1K.
Who holds AID?
As of Nov 1, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 60.6% of the supply across 682 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of AGENT ID?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified