Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Is YFI a Scam?

BNB Chain
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Nov 5, 2026 · 1 audit on recordNew Launch · 22h old
SummaryAI Copilot

The YFI contract implements a custom minting mechanism tied to Binance Agent IDs and automated liquidity provision.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through; held by router: Other-Contract
  • Liquidity < $50k
  • Volume/Liquidity > 15×
Exact factors
  • A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through; held by router: Other-Contract
  • Liquidity < $50k ($10,617 across 1 pairs — thin market)
  • Volume/Liquidity > 15× (21.6× — wash-trading signal)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (22h old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.

Security Checklist

as of audit · Nov 56 of 7 checks passed
Contract verifiedVerified
OwnershipRenounced
MintNo mint
Liquidity lockLocked
UpgradeabilityFixed code
HoneypotNone found
Buy / sell tax1% / 1%

Holders

as of audit · Nov 5, 2026305 holders
2.4%11.3%Wallets14.2%DEX pools72.1%Everyone else
11.3%Wallets14.2%DEX pools72.1%Everyone else
ContractsWalletsDEX poolsEveryone elseBubble area = share of supply
27.9%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking2.4%
  • Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell11.3%
  • DEX poolsthe pools' own liquidity14.2%
  • Everyone else295 holders72.1%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads12.3%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Nov 5, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Nov 5$10.6K

The risk score reads depth across every pair.

LP tokensLocked

The LP tokens of the analysed pool are locked or burned.

Analysed pool$10.6KShare of depth100.0%
LP Burned97.8% · ≈ permanent lock
LP Locked97.8% · Null Address
Unlocked LP held by
0x0ed9…9706

No privileged address appears among these holders: the unlocked liquidity sits with independent providers, not with the deployer.

Security Findings

1 Medium6 Info
Medium

Centralized Control Over Trading Status

The contract contains a 'tradingOpen' switch that dictates whether token transfers are permitted. This switch could be toggled by the owner via 'openTradingEarly' or automatically upon reaching the minting limit in the 'receive' function. While ownership is now renounced, this mechanism represents a centralized point of failure during the initial deployment phase.CP-05

Issue

The contract contains a 'tradingOpen' switch that dictates whether token transfers are permitted. This switch could be toggled by the owner via 'openTradingEarly' or automatically upon reaching the minting limit in the 'receive' function. While ownership is now renounced, this mechanism represents a centralized point of failure during the initial deployment phase.

Fix

Since ownership is renounced, this risk is mitigated. For future deployments, ensure that trading is enabled automatically or via a decentralized mechanism to avoid reliance on a single privileged address.

Status

Unresolved

Info

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 27.9% of supply. Of that, 14.2% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 11.3% in wallets, 2.4% in other contracts. 305 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

The ten largest holders own 27.9% of supply. Of that, 14.2% in DEX pools — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 11.3% in wallets, 2.4% in other contracts. 305 holders in total.

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Not listed by any independent source

305 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

305 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Liquidity burned — cannot be withdrawn

97.8% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 97.8% of the LP tokens were sent to a burn address — that liquidity can never be withdrawn by anyone. 2.2% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. No single one holds a majority: their exits thin the market rather than hand anyone the pool. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY

Issue

97.8% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 97.8% of the LP tokens were sent to a burn address — that liquidity can never be withdrawn by anyone. 2.2% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. No single one holds a majority: their exits thin the market rather than hand anyone the pool. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.

Fix

Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

The market for this token

Liquidity $11K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $229K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $11K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $229K (DexScreener, all pools).

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Project token

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: nobody (ownership renounced). Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: 1% on buy, 1% on sell. Market: $11K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: fixed — the contract has no mint function. Control: nobody (ownership renounced). Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: 1% on buy, 1% on sell. Market: $11K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.

Fix

Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Recently launched — less than a day of market history

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT

Issue

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.

Fix

Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Nov 5
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The YFI contract implements a custom minting mechanism tied to Binance Agent IDs and automated liquidity provision. While ownership has been renounced, the contract contains centralized control mechanisms over trading status that were active during the minting phase. The architecture is standard for a liquidity-bootstrapping token, though it lacks standard ERC-20 metadata functions.

Technical8/10Low risk

The contract utilizes a custom minting flow that interacts with PancakeSwap routers to automate liquidity. 7.1 Architecture is centralized around a minting phase, 7.2 Code Security is standard for custom tokens, and 7.3 Access Control relies on a now-renounced owner. 7.6 External dependencies include the PancakeSwap router for liquidity management. The code lacks standard ERC-20 functions like totalSupply and balanceOf, which may cause compatibility issues with external dApps.

Governance7/10Low risk

7.4 Economic parameters are fixed by the minting logic and the hardcoded liquidity provision. 7.5 Governance is effectively non-existent as ownership has been renounced. The economic model relies on the successful completion of the minting phase to enable trading. 7.8 Operations are limited to the initial minting and subsequent trading.

Upgrades8/10Low risk

7.7 Upgrades are not supported as the contract is not a proxy and lacks upgradeability patterns. The logic is immutable, ensuring that the current transfer rules cannot be altered post-renouncement. This provides high security against unauthorized logic changes.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

The protocol is currently in a stable, immutable state due to the renouncement of ownership.

Users should be aware that the lack of standard ERC-20 functions (totalSupply, balanceOf) may prevent the token from displaying correctly in standard wallets or interacting with some DeFi protocols. No further action is required for the current contract state.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
TypeRouter, Token
NetworkBNB Chain
Token age22h
Contract0x0f93…b190
Deployer0xaccd…d362
Badge for your website
YFI security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Nov 5, 202644Medium

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the YFI contract address?

The YFI contract on BNB Chain is 0x0f93636f10fbb4820f2c2f241d167c287041b190. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.

Is YFI a scam?

Quantum Audit's risk score for YFI is 44/100 (Medium risk) as of Nov 5, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Ownership: Renounced; Mint: No mint; Liquidity lock: Locked; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 1% / 1%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.

Is YFI liquidity locked?

Liquidity lock: Locked (as of Nov 5, 2026). Total DEX liquidity: $10.6K.

Who holds YFI?

As of Nov 5, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 27.9% of the supply across 305 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of YFI?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified