Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 token with governance and vesting capabilities.
Read the full analysisEach factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 26, 2026
The risk score reads depth across every pair.
Whether the LP tokens are locked could not be determined.
The owner has the authority to call 'updateMintRate' and 'release', which can increase the total supply of the token. This allows the owner to dilute the holdings of all existing token holders at their discretion.
Implement a hard cap on the total supply or transition the minting authority to a decentralized governance process with a timelock.
Unresolved
The owner can call 'lockPool' and 'unlockPool' to toggle the 'isPoolUnlocked' switch. This allows the owner to unilaterally prevent users from transferring their tokens, effectively freezing liquidity.
Remove the ability for the owner to pause or lock transfers, or restrict this functionality to emergency scenarios managed by a decentralized security council.
Unresolved
The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.8% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 0.0% in wallets, 96.2% in other contracts. 10 holders in total.
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Acknowledged
10 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Acknowledged
Liquidity $12K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $99K (DexScreener, all pools).
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Acknowledged
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $12K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Acknowledged
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Acknowledged
The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 token with governance and vesting capabilities. The protocol exhibits centralized control, where the owner holds significant power over token supply and transferability. While the code follows standard OpenZeppelin patterns, the ability for the owner to unilaterally mint tokens and halt transfers presents a notable risk to token holders.
The contract utilizes well-audited OpenZeppelin libraries for ERC-20, Votes, and Permit functionality. 7.1 Architecture is modular, and 7.2 Code Security is high due to standard implementation patterns. 7.3 Access Control is strictly enforced via Ownable, though it grants excessive power to the owner. 7.8 Operations are straightforward, relying on standard block timestamp logic.
7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance aspects are centralized. The owner can influence supply through minting and restrict liquidity via pool locking. While 7.6 External dependencies are minimal, the economic model relies entirely on the owner's discretion, which is a significant trust assumption for users.
7.7 Upgrades are not implemented as this is a non-proxy contract. The logic is immutable, meaning the current privileged functions are fixed and cannot be removed without a full contract migration. This provides transparency but lacks flexibility for future governance improvements.
To improve security and trust, consider transitioning ownership to a decentralized multi-signature wallet or a DAO governance contract.
This would mitigate the risks associated with a single point of failure regarding minting and transfer control. Additionally, implement a timelock mechanism for all privileged functions. A delay on actions like 'updateMintRate' or 'lockPool' would provide the community with sufficient notice and the ability to react to significant changes in tokenomics or transferability.
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Add your links and get it Verified
