Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Is XRC a Scam?

Base
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Oct 25, 2026 · 1 audit on recordNew Launch · 16h old
SummaryAI Copilot

The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 token with additional governance and vesting capabilities.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • Owner can pause all transfers
  • A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
  • Liquidity not locked
  • Top-10 concentration > 30%
Exact factors
  • Owner can pause all transfers
  • A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
  • Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool) — who holds it cannot be verified
  • Top-10 concentration > 30% (100.0% total → 48.2% effective; 16.2% in EOAs, 80.0% in contracts; 3.8% burned, locked or in pools excluded)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (16h old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.

Security Checklist

as of audit · Oct 254 of 7 checks passed
Contract verifiedVerified
OwnershipRetained
MintMintable
Liquidity lockNot locked
UpgradeabilityFixed code
HoneypotNone found
Buy / sell tax0% / 0%

Holders

as of audit · Oct 25, 20262,636 holders
80.0%Contracts16.2%Wallets3.8%
80.0%Contracts16.2%Wallets3.8%
ContractsWalletsBurnedBubble area = share of supply
100.0%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking80.0%
  • Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell16.2%
  • Burnedout of circulation3.8%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads48.2%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 25, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Oct 25$100.7K

The risk score reads depth across every pair.

LP tokensNot locked

The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.

Analysed pool$100.7KShare of depth100.0%
Top-1 Unlocked Holder100.0%
Top-3 Unlocked100.0%
Unlocked LP held by
0x6fb9…43bf

Security Findings

3 Medium5 Info
Medium

Centralized Control Over Token Supply

The owner has the authority to call updateMintRate and release, which can increase the total supply of tokens. This allows the owner to dilute the holdings of all existing token holders at their discretion.CP-01

Issue

The owner has the authority to call updateMintRate and release, which can increase the total supply of tokens. This allows the owner to dilute the holdings of all existing token holders at their discretion.

Fix

Implement a timelock on the updateMintRate function or move ownership to a DAO to ensure that supply changes are subject to community consensus.

Status

Unresolved

Medium

Centralized Control Over Transferability

The owner can use the lockPool and unlockPool functions to toggle a switch that determines whether transfers are permitted. This gives the owner the ability to freeze user assets or halt trading activity entirely.CP-05

Issue

The owner can use the lockPool and unlockPool functions to toggle a switch that determines whether transfers are permitted. This gives the owner the ability to freeze user assets or halt trading activity entirely.

Fix

Remove the ability to arbitrarily lock transfers or implement a clear, transparent policy for when such actions are permitted, ideally governed by a decentralized process.

Status

Unresolved

Medium

Liquidity not locked

0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a contract, 0x6fb9…43bf — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.QA-LIQUIDITY

Issue

0.0% of the pool's LP is burned or time-locked. 100.0% is held, unlocked, by 1 address(es) other than the owner/deployer. One of them — a contract, 0x6fb9…43bf — holds 100.0% and can remove that share at once; who controls it is not visible on-chain, so it is not treated as an independent provider. Some pools are concentrated-liquidity (V3/V4) positions; shares above are by position as GoPlus reports them.

Fix

Check the lock's end date and beneficiary on the locker's own page before relying on it.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.8% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 2,636 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.8% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 2,636 holders in total.

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Not listed by any independent source

2,636 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

2,636 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

The market for this token

Liquidity $101K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $230K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $101K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $230K (DexScreener, all pools).

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Project token

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $101K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $101K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.

Fix

Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Recently launched — less than a day of market history

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT

Issue

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.

Fix

Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 25
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 token with additional governance and vesting capabilities. The protocol relies on a centralized owner to manage inflation, pool locking, and vesting releases. While the code follows standard OpenZeppelin patterns, the high degree of administrative control presents a significant centralization risk to token holders.

Technical8/10Low risk

The contract utilizes well-tested OpenZeppelin libraries for ERC-20, Votes, and Permit functionality. 7.1 Architecture is modular, and 7.2 Code Security is high due to the use of standard, audited base contracts. 7.3 Access Control is strictly enforced via Ownable, though it grants the owner extensive power over token supply and transferability.

Governance1/10High risk

7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance risks are elevated due to the owner's ability to mint tokens and halt transfers. The 2% annual inflation cap provides a guardrail, but the owner retains unilateral control over the supply schedule. 7.6 External dependencies are minimal, relying primarily on the underlying blockchain's block timestamp.

Upgrades3/10High risk

7.7 Upgrades are not implemented as this is a non-proxy contract. 7.8 Operations are straightforward, with administrative actions clearly defined. No complex upgrade paths exist that could introduce hidden logic changes.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

To improve security, consider transitioning the ownership to a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized governance contract to mitigate the risk of a single point of failure.

Additionally, implementing a timelock for sensitive functions like updateMintRate would provide transparency and allow the community to react to administrative changes.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
TypeToken
NetworkBase
Token age16h
Contract0x8e38…2bef
Deployer0x4be6…3f3b
Badge for your website
XRC security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Oct 25, 202663Medium

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the XRC contract address?

The XRC contract on Base is 0x8e38e095a1ee14a6f095b0cc8abe4dc455252bef. Compare it with the address the project itself publishes before trading: other contracts can carry the same name and ticker.

Is XRC a scam?

Quantum Audit's risk score for XRC is 63/100 (Medium risk) as of Oct 25, 2026, computed by a deterministic function from on-chain facts — Contract verified: Verified; Ownership: Retained; Mint: Mintable; Liquidity lock: Not locked; Upgradeability: Fixed code; Honeypot: None found; Buy / sell tax: 0% / 0%. A score is a dated snapshot of those facts, not a guarantee; each one is listed on this page.

Is XRC liquidity locked?

Liquidity lock: Not locked (as of Oct 25, 2026). Total DEX liquidity: $100.7K.

Who holds XRC?

As of Oct 25, 2026, the 10 largest holders own 100.0% of the supply across 2,636 holders. The Holders section on this page shows who they are by holder type.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of XRC?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page