Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Is XRC a Scam?

Base
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Oct 21, 2026 · 1 audit on recordNew Launch · 22h old
SummaryAI Copilot

The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 implementation with additional governance and vesting features.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • Owner can pause all transfers
  • A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
  • LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
  • Top-10 concentration > 30%
Exact factors
  • Owner can pause all transfers
  • A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
  • LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
  • Top-10 concentration > 30% (100.0% total → 48.3% effective; 16.3% in EOAs, 80.0% in contracts; 3.7% burned, locked or in pools excluded)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (22h old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.

Security Checklist

as of audit · Oct 214 of 7 checks passed
Contract verifiedVerified
OwnershipRetained
MintMintable
Liquidity lockUnknown
UpgradeabilityFixed code
HoneypotNone found
Buy / sell tax0% / 0%

Holders

as of audit · Oct 21, 20262,018 holders
80.0%Contracts16.3%Wallets3.7%
80.0%Contracts16.3%Wallets3.7%
ContractsWalletsBurnedBubble area = share of supply
100.0%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking80.0%
  • Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell16.3%
  • Burnedout of circulation3.7%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads48.3%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 21, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Oct 21$52.5K

The risk score reads depth across every pair.

LP tokensUnknown

Whether the LP tokens are locked could not be determined.

Analysed pool$52.5KShare of depth100.0%

Security Findings

2 Medium5 Info
Medium

Centralized Minting Authority

The owner has the ability to mint new tokens via the updateMintRate and release functions. This allows the owner to increase the total supply at their discretion, which dilutes the value of existing holdings.CP-01

Issue

The owner has the ability to mint new tokens via the updateMintRate and release functions. This allows the owner to increase the total supply at their discretion, which dilutes the value of existing holdings.

Fix

Consider implementing a hard-capped supply or moving the minting authority to a decentralized governance mechanism to prevent arbitrary inflation.

Status

Unresolved

Medium

Centralized Control Over Token Transfers

The owner can use the lockPool and unlockPool functions to enable or disable transfers for specific pools. This gives the owner the power to freeze user assets or restrict liquidity at will.CP-05

Issue

The owner can use the lockPool and unlockPool functions to enable or disable transfers for specific pools. This gives the owner the power to freeze user assets or restrict liquidity at will.

Fix

Remove the ability to arbitrarily lock pools or implement a transparent, time-locked process for any necessary maintenance-related pauses.

Status

Unresolved

Info

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.7% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.3% in wallets, 80.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 2,018 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.7% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.3% in wallets, 80.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 2,018 holders in total.

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Not listed by any independent source

2,018 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

2,018 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

The market for this token

Liquidity $53K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $371K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $53K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $371K (DexScreener, all pools).

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Project token

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $53K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $53K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.

Fix

Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Recently launched — less than a day of market history

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT

Issue

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.

Fix

Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 21
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 implementation with additional governance and vesting features. The protocol relies on a centralized owner to manage inflation rates and pool access. While the code follows standard OpenZeppelin patterns, the high degree of administrative control presents a significant trust requirement for token holders.

Technical8/10Low risk

The architecture utilizes standard OpenZeppelin libraries for ERC-20 and governance, ensuring 7.1 Architecture and 7.2 Code Security standards are met. The implementation is clean and follows established patterns for 7.3 Access Control. However, the reliance on owner-only functions for critical state changes creates a single point of failure.

Governance3/10High risk

The protocol implements 7.4 Economic controls via inflation management and 7.5 Governance via ownership. The owner has the authority to mint tokens and restrict pool transfers, which directly impacts 7.4 Economic stability. These powers are currently unrestricted by a DAO or multi-sig, posing a risk to holders.

Upgrades4/10Medium risk

The contract is not upgradeable, mitigating 7.7 Upgrades risks. 7.6 External dependencies are limited to standard OpenZeppelin contracts. 7.8 Operations are straightforward and do not involve complex proxy logic.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

It is recommended to transition the ownership of the contract to a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized governance contract to mitigate the risks associated with the current centralized control.

Implementing a timelock on sensitive functions like updateMintRate and lockPool would provide transparency and protection against sudden administrative actions.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
TypeToken
NetworkBase
Token age22h
Contract0x80f5…3554
Deployer0x581b…b1c1
Badge for your website
XRC security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Oct 21, 202656Medium

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of XRC?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page