The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 implementation with additional governance and vesting features. The protocol relies on a centralized owner to manage inflation rates and pool access. While the code follows standard OpenZeppelin patterns, the high degree of administrative control presents a significant trust requirement for token holders.
Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is XRC a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 implementation with additional governance and vesting features.
Read the full analysis- Owner can pause all transfers
- A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
- LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
- Top-10 concentration > 30%
Exact factors
- Owner can pause all transfers
- A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
- LP lock status UNKNOWN — the pool's LP could not be read
- Top-10 concentration > 30% (100.0% total → 48.3% effective; 16.3% in EOAs, 80.0% in contracts; 3.7% burned, locked or in pools excluded)
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Oct 21Holders
as of audit · Oct 21, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking80.0%
- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell16.3%
- Burnedout of circulation3.7%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 21, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Oct 21The risk score reads depth across every pair.
Whether the LP tokens are locked could not be determined.
Security Findings
MediumCentralized Minting Authority
The owner has the ability to mint new tokens via the updateMintRate and release functions. This allows the owner to increase the total supply at their discretion, which dilutes the value of existing holdings.CP-01
Issue
The owner has the ability to mint new tokens via the updateMintRate and release functions. This allows the owner to increase the total supply at their discretion, which dilutes the value of existing holdings.
Fix
Consider implementing a hard-capped supply or moving the minting authority to a decentralized governance mechanism to prevent arbitrary inflation.
Status
Unresolved
MediumCentralized Control Over Token Transfers
The owner can use the lockPool and unlockPool functions to enable or disable transfers for specific pools. This gives the owner the power to freeze user assets or restrict liquidity at will.CP-05
Issue
The owner can use the lockPool and unlockPool functions to enable or disable transfers for specific pools. This gives the owner the power to freeze user assets or restrict liquidity at will.
Fix
Remove the ability to arbitrarily lock pools or implement a transparent, time-locked process for any necessary maintenance-related pauses.
Status
Unresolved
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.7% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.3% in wallets, 80.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 2,018 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.7% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.3% in wallets, 80.0% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 2,018 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
2,018 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
2,018 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $53K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $371K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $53K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $371K (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $53K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $53K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — less than a day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 21The architecture utilizes standard OpenZeppelin libraries for ERC-20 and governance, ensuring 7.1 Architecture and 7.2 Code Security standards are met. The implementation is clean and follows established patterns for 7.3 Access Control. However, the reliance on owner-only functions for critical state changes creates a single point of failure.
The protocol implements 7.4 Economic controls via inflation management and 7.5 Governance via ownership. The owner has the authority to mint tokens and restrict pool transfers, which directly impacts 7.4 Economic stability. These powers are currently unrestricted by a DAO or multi-sig, posing a risk to holders.
The contract is not upgradeable, mitigating 7.7 Upgrades risks. 7.6 External dependencies are limited to standard OpenZeppelin contracts. 7.8 Operations are straightforward and do not involve complex proxy logic.
It is recommended to transition the ownership of the contract to a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized governance contract to mitigate the risks associated with the current centralized control.
Implementing a timelock on sensitive functions like updateMintRate and lockPool would provide transparency and protection against sudden administrative actions.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Oct 21, 202656Medium
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of XRC?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page