Quantum Audit Logo
Launch App

Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis

Is XRC a Scam?

Base
Not verified This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →
Last checked Oct 20, 2026 · 1 audit on recordNew Launch · 16h old
SummaryAI Copilot

The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 implementation with additional governance and vesting features.

Read the full analysis
What raised the score
  • Owner can pause all transfers
  • A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
  • Liquidity not locked
  • Liquidity < $50k
  • Top-10 concentration > 30%
Exact factors
  • Owner can pause all transfers
  • A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
  • Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
  • Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool) — who holds it cannot be verified
  • Liquidity < $50k ($30,026 across 1 pairs — thin market)
  • Top-10 concentration > 30% (100.0% total → 48.2% effective; 16.2% in EOAs, 80.1% in contracts; 3.7% burned, locked or in pools excluded)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Early-stage analysis. This token has limited on-chain history (16h old). New tokens carry elevated risk — data may change rapidly. Always verify independently before investing.

Security Checklist

as of audit · Oct 204 of 7 checks passed
Contract verifiedVerified
OwnershipRetained
MintMintable
Liquidity lockNot locked
UpgradeabilityFixed code
HoneypotNone found
Buy / sell tax0% / 0%

Holders

as of audit · Oct 20, 20261,615 holders
80.1%Contracts16.2%Wallets3.7%
80.1%Contracts16.2%Wallets3.7%
ContractsWalletsBurnedBubble area = share of supply
100.0%of supply sits with the top 10 holders
  • Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking80.1%
  • Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell16.2%
  • Burnedout of circulation3.7%
Effective concentrationwhat the score reads48.2%
How holder types affect the score

Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.

Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 20, 2026

Liquidity

as of audit · Oct 20$30.0K

The risk score reads depth across every pair.

LP tokensNot locked

The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.

Analysed pool$30.0KShare of depth100.0%

Security Findings

2 Medium5 Info
Medium

Centralized Minting Authority

The owner can call updateMintRate and release to increase the total supply of tokens. This allows the owner to dilute the holdings of all existing token holders at their discretion.CP-01

Issue

The owner can call updateMintRate and release to increase the total supply of tokens. This allows the owner to dilute the holdings of all existing token holders at their discretion.

Fix

Implement a timelock for minting operations or transition ownership to a DAO to ensure community oversight of supply changes.

Status

Unresolved

Medium

Centralized Control Over Token Transfers

The owner can use lockPool and unlockPool to toggle the ability for the pool to process transfers. This gives the owner the power to effectively freeze liquidity or halt trading for the token.CP-05

Issue

The owner can use lockPool and unlockPool to toggle the ability for the pool to process transfers. This gives the owner the power to effectively freeze liquidity or halt trading for the token.

Fix

Remove the ability for the owner to arbitrarily lock the pool, or restrict this functionality to a decentralized governance mechanism with a mandatory delay.

Status

Unresolved

Info

Who holds the supply

The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.7% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.1% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 1,615 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS

Issue

The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.7% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.1% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 1,615 holders in total.

Fix

Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Not listed by any independent source

1,615 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY

Issue

1,615 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.

Fix

Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

The market for this token

Liquidity $30K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $296K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET

Issue

Liquidity $30K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $296K (DexScreener, all pools).

Fix

Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Asset class: Project token

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $30K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE

Issue

A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $30K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.

Fix

Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.

Status

Acknowledged

Info

Recently launched — less than a day of market history

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT

Issue

The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.

Fix

Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.

Status

Acknowledged

Analysis

AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 20
Executive SummaryWhat the contract is and what the review found

The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 implementation with additional governance and vesting features. The protocol relies on a centralized owner to manage inflation rates and pool access. While the code follows standard OpenZeppelin patterns, the high degree of administrative control presents a significant centralization risk for token holders.

Technical6/10Medium risk

The architecture utilizes standard OpenZeppelin libraries for ERC-20, Votes, and Permits, ensuring robust base functionality. 7.1 Architecture and 7.2 Code Security are well-implemented, adhering to modern Solidity practices. 7.3 Access Control is strictly enforced via Ownable, though it grants extensive power to the owner. 7.6 External dependencies are minimal and well-vetted.

Governance1/10High risk

7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance aspects are heavily centralized under the contract owner. The owner has the ability to mint tokens and halt pool transfers, which directly impacts token value and liquidity. While inflation is capped at 2% per year, the lack of a timelock or DAO governance for these actions is a notable concern.

Upgrades3/10High risk

7.7 Upgrades are not supported as this is an immutable contract. 7.8 Operations are straightforward, relying on the owner to trigger vesting releases and inflation adjustments. No upgradeability risks exist for this specific implementation.

Final RecommendationWhat to do about this score

It is recommended to transition the ownership of the contract to a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized governance contract to mitigate the risks associated with a single point of failure.

Implementing a timelock on sensitive functions like updateMintRate and lockPool would provide transparency and protection for token holders against sudden administrative changes.

Contract & Record

1 audit on record
TypeToken
NetworkBase
Token age16h
Contract0xe673…a8e1
Deployer0x3cd3…8fee
Badge for your website
XRC security record badge

Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.

Audit History
  1. Oct 20, 202668High

Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.

Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of XRC?

This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.

Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page