The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 implementation with additional governance and vesting features. The protocol relies on a centralized owner to manage inflation rates and pool access. While the code follows standard OpenZeppelin patterns, the high degree of administrative control presents a significant centralization risk for token holders.
Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
Is XRC a Scam?
Not verified
This record has not gone through deep verification and is not being monitored. The score is a dated snapshot — the token’s risk can change at any time.Own this token? Put it under verification →The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 implementation with additional governance and vesting features.
Read the full analysis- Owner can pause all transfers
- A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
- Liquidity not locked
- Liquidity < $50k
- Top-10 concentration > 30%
Exact factors
- Owner can pause all transfers
- A privileged address controls a switch that decides whether transfers go through
- Mintable supply — no cap found, dilution unbounded
- Liquidity NOT locked (100% of the pool) — who holds it cannot be verified
- Liquidity < $50k ($30,026 across 1 pairs — thin market)
- Top-10 concentration > 30% (100.0% total → 48.2% effective; 16.2% in EOAs, 80.1% in contracts; 3.7% burned, locked or in pools excluded)
Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Security Checklist
as of audit · Oct 20Holders
as of audit · Oct 20, 2026- Contractstreasury, vesting, bridge, staking80.1%
- Walletsanonymous holders, free to sell16.2%
- Burnedout of circulation3.7%
How holder types affect the score
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 20, 2026
Liquidity
as of audit · Oct 20The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.
Security Findings
MediumCentralized Minting Authority
The owner can call updateMintRate and release to increase the total supply of tokens. This allows the owner to dilute the holdings of all existing token holders at their discretion.CP-01
Issue
The owner can call updateMintRate and release to increase the total supply of tokens. This allows the owner to dilute the holdings of all existing token holders at their discretion.
Fix
Implement a timelock for minting operations or transition ownership to a DAO to ensure community oversight of supply changes.
Status
Unresolved
MediumCentralized Control Over Token Transfers
The owner can use lockPool and unlockPool to toggle the ability for the pool to process transfers. This gives the owner the power to effectively freeze liquidity or halt trading for the token.CP-05
Issue
The owner can use lockPool and unlockPool to toggle the ability for the pool to process transfers. This gives the owner the power to effectively freeze liquidity or halt trading for the token.
Fix
Remove the ability for the owner to arbitrarily lock the pool, or restrict this functionality to a decentralized governance mechanism with a mandatory delay.
Status
Unresolved
InfoWho holds the supply
The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.7% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.1% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 1,615 holders in total.QA-HOLDERS
Issue
The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.7% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.2% in wallets, 80.1% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.2%. 1,615 holders in total.
Fix
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoNot listed by any independent source
1,615 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.QA-IDENTITY
Issue
1,615 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Fix
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoThe market for this token
Liquidity $30K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $296K (DexScreener, all pools).QA-MARKET
Issue
Liquidity $30K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $296K (DexScreener, all pools).
Fix
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoAsset class: Project token
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $30K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.QA-PROFILE
Issue
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $30K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Fix
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Status
Acknowledged
InfoRecently launched — less than a day of market history
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.QA-RECENT
Issue
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Fix
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Status
Acknowledged
Analysis
AI Copilotas of audit · Oct 20The architecture utilizes standard OpenZeppelin libraries for ERC-20, Votes, and Permits, ensuring robust base functionality. 7.1 Architecture and 7.2 Code Security are well-implemented, adhering to modern Solidity practices. 7.3 Access Control is strictly enforced via Ownable, though it grants extensive power to the owner. 7.6 External dependencies are minimal and well-vetted.
7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance aspects are heavily centralized under the contract owner. The owner has the ability to mint tokens and halt pool transfers, which directly impacts token value and liquidity. While inflation is capped at 2% per year, the lack of a timelock or DAO governance for these actions is a notable concern.
7.7 Upgrades are not supported as this is an immutable contract. 7.8 Operations are straightforward, relying on the owner to trigger vesting releases and inflation adjustments. No upgradeability risks exist for this specific implementation.
It is recommended to transition the ownership of the contract to a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized governance contract to mitigate the risks associated with a single point of failure.
Implementing a timelock on sensitive functions like updateMintRate and lockPool would provide transparency and protection for token holders against sudden administrative changes.
Contract & Record
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
- Oct 20, 202668High
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
Would You Like a More Detailed Audit of XRC?
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page