Is would Safe? Smart Contract Security Analysis

Security Findings

1 Info

Info

No code-level findings — an SPL mint exposes no auditable program source

I-01This token is an SPL token mint, not a deployed program: there is no contract source code on-chain for a line-by-line review, so no code-level vulnerability could be identified either way. The assessment on this page therefore rests on holder concentration, which are read directly from chain state and from third-party risk registries.

IssueThis token is an SPL token mint, not a deployed program: there is no contract source code on-chain for a line-by-line review, so no code-level vulnerability could be identified either way. The assessment on this page therefore rests on holder concentration, which are read directly from chain state and from third-party risk registries.

FixRead the risk score breakdown below as the substance of this audit. For a code-level review, the token would need an accompanying verified program.

StatusAcknowledged

Category Ratings

TechnicalLow10/10

The 'would' token is implemented using the standard spl-token program (v3). Key administrative authorities, including the mint authority and freeze authority, are both revoked (None), ensuring no new tokens can be minted and no accounts can be frozen post-launch. The token does not utilize any Token-2022 extensions that would introduce mutable states or special permissions, such as balance mutability or default frozen accounts, as indicated by all relevant flags being 'False'. This configuration aligns with a secure, immutable token design (7.1 Architecture, 7.3 Access Control).

GovernanceHigh3/10

The economic profile of the WOULD token appears stable. Holder concentration is low, with the top 10 token accounts holding only 12.21% of the total supply, mitigating risks associated with whale manipulation (7.4 Economic). Total DEX liquidity is robust at $1,013,021, supporting efficient trading. The 24-hour volume of $151,713 results in a healthy Volume/Liquidity Ratio of 0.15, which does not suggest wash trading. The DEX pair has been active for 772 days, indicating a well-established market presence (7.6 External).

UpgradesMedium5/10

The token's upgradeability and mutability aspects are minimal, contributing to a low-risk profile. Both the mint authority and freeze authority are revoked, preventing any future changes to the token's supply or account freeze status. Furthermore, the metadata_mutable flag is 'False', meaning the token's name, symbol, or image cannot be altered post-launch. There are no active Token-2022 extensions that would allow for future upgradability of features like transfer fees or transfer hooks (7.7 Upgrades).

Security Checklist

2/4 checks passed

Contract VerifiedPass

No Mint Function?

Liquidity LockedFail

Not a ProxyPass

HoneypotNoneBuy Tax0.0%Sell Tax0.0%

Liquidity Depth

$1.02M across 5 pairs

RaydiumSOLanalysed$1.02M Raydium CPMMSOL$86 Meteora DYN2CSR$9 Raydium CPMMSOL$6 Meteora DYN2PEPE$2

The risk score reads depth across every pair. The volume figure and the volume-to-liquidity ratio elsewhere on this page describe only the pair this audit analysed, so the two are not directly comparable.

What Raised This Score

3 factors

Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
Liquidity NOT locked (owner can withdraw — rug-pull risk)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Is would Safe?