Is 🦎 (LIZARD) Safe? Smart Contract Security Analysis

Security Findings

1 Info

Info

No code-level findings — an SPL mint exposes no auditable program source

I-01This token is an SPL token mint, not a deployed program: there is no contract source code on-chain for a line-by-line review, so no code-level vulnerability could be identified either way. The assessment on this page therefore rests on LP lock/burn state, holder concentration, which are read directly from chain state and from third-party risk registries.

IssueThis token is an SPL token mint, not a deployed program: there is no contract source code on-chain for a line-by-line review, so no code-level vulnerability could be identified either way. The assessment on this page therefore rests on LP lock/burn state, holder concentration, which are read directly from chain state and from third-party risk registries.

FixRead the risk score breakdown below as the substance of this audit. For a code-level review, the token would need an accompanying verified program.

StatusAcknowledged

Category Ratings

TechnicalMedium6/10

The 🦎 (LIZARD) token is a standard SPL token mint operating under the `spl-token` program. Its supply is fixed at 999,777,379.812728 tokens, as the mint authority has been revoked. Similarly, the freeze authority is also revoked, meaning no accounts can be frozen post-issuance. The token does not utilize Token-2022 extensions such as permanent delegates, transfer hooks, or default frozen account states, nor does it have balance mutability.

GovernanceHigh3/10

The token exhibits healthy trading metrics with a 24-hour volume of $1,499 against a liquidity of $32,609, resulting in a normal Volume/Liquidity Ratio of 0.05. The DEX pair has been active for 346 days, providing a sufficient track record. However, holder concentration data was unavailable, which prevents a complete assessment of potential market manipulation risks from large holders.

UpgradesLow7/10

The token's core parameters are immutable due to the revocation of both mint and freeze authorities. This means the supply cannot be increased, and no accounts can be frozen. Furthermore, the token's metadata is not mutable, ensuring its name, symbol, and image cannot be changed post-launch. The token does not feature upgradable transfer fees or transfer hooks, indicating a stable and predictable operational model.

Security Checklist

2/4 checks passed

Contract VerifiedFail

No Mint Function?

Liquidity LockedPass

Not a ProxyPass

Liquidity Depth

$36.0K across 3 pairs

Raydium CPMMSOLanalysed$35.8K Meteora DYN2VCF$179 Raydium CLMMUSD1$3

The risk score reads depth across every pair. The volume figure and the volume-to-liquidity ratio elsewhere on this page describe only the pair this audit analysed, so the two are not directly comparable.

LP Distribution

LP Burned100.0% · ≈ permanent lock

LP Locked100.0% · Raydium Lock

What Raised This Score

5 factors

Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
Contract source NOT verified
Top-10 concentration > 50% (57.0% total → 57.0% effective; 57.0% in EOAs, 0.0% in contracts — heavy)
Liquidity < $50k ($35,995 across 3 pairs — thin market)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Is 🦎 Safe?