Is Aliens are real (ALIENS) Safe? Smart Contract Security Analysis

Security Findings

1 Info

Info

No code-level findings — an SPL mint exposes no auditable program source

I-01This token is an SPL token mint, not a deployed program: there is no contract source code on-chain for a line-by-line review, so no code-level vulnerability could be identified either way. The assessment on this page therefore rests on holder concentration, which are read directly from chain state and from third-party risk registries.

IssueThis token is an SPL token mint, not a deployed program: there is no contract source code on-chain for a line-by-line review, so no code-level vulnerability could be identified either way. The assessment on this page therefore rests on holder concentration, which are read directly from chain state and from third-party risk registries.

FixRead the risk score breakdown below as the substance of this audit. For a code-level review, the token would need an accompanying verified program.

StatusAcknowledged

Category Ratings

TechnicalMedium6/10

The Aliens token is implemented using the spl-token-2022 program. Both the mint authority and freeze authority have been revoked, ensuring that no new tokens can be minted and no existing token accounts can be frozen by an external party. The token does not utilize a transfer hook, meaning transfers are not subject to custom on-chain program logic. Additionally, new accounts are not created in a frozen state.

GovernanceHigh2/10

The token exhibits a total DEX liquidity of $94,820, with a 24-hour trading volume of $72,217. The volume-to-liquidity ratio is 0.76, which is considered normal and does not suggest wash trading. The DEX pair has been active for 146 days, providing a reasonable track record. Information regarding holder concentration was unavailable, so an assessment of whale risk cannot be made.

UpgradesMedium5/10

The mint authority and freeze authority are both revoked, meaning the token's supply and account freeze status are immutable. The token does not have a transfer hook, and the `transfer_hook_upgradable` flag is false, confirming this functionality cannot be added later. Metadata mutability is also false, ensuring the token's name, symbol, and image cannot be altered post-launch.

Security Checklist

1/4 checks passed

Contract VerifiedFail

No Mint Function?

Liquidity LockedFail

Not a ProxyPass

Liquidity Depth

$107.5K across 8 pairs

PumpswapSOLanalysed$103.1K Meteora DLMMSOL$3.1K Meteora DLMMSOL$981 Meteora DLMMUSDC$295 Raydium CPMM9IR$100 Meteora DYN2PEPE$7

Show 1 more pairShow less

Orca wpSOL$2

The risk score reads depth across every pair. The volume figure and the volume-to-liquidity ratio elsewhere on this page describe only the pair this audit analysed, so the two are not directly comparable.

What Raised This Score

5 factors

Ownership status UNKNOWN (owner could not be resolved)
Mint capability UNKNOWN (implementation ABI unreadable)
Contract source NOT verified
Top-10 concentration > 30% (37.9% total → 37.9% effective; 37.9% in EOAs, 0.0% in contracts — moderate)
Liquidity NOT locked (owner can withdraw — rug-pull risk)

Each factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed

Is Aliens are real Safe?