Early-stage security check — honeypot & rug-pull analysis
The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 implementation with added governance, voting, and vesting capabilities.
Read the full analysisEach factor is an on-chain fact recorded at the time of this analysis. The score is computed from them by a deterministic function, so the same contract returns the same score for anyone who runs the audit. How scores are computed
Share held by contracts — treasury, vesting, bridge or staking — is discounted against share held by wallets when the score is computed: a contract cannot decide to sell the way an anonymous holder can, though it can still be drained or voted to sell. Effective concentration is the figure the risk score is actually calculated from.
Holder balances as recorded by the audit of Oct 20, 2026
The risk score reads depth across every pair.
The LP tokens of the analysed pool are not locked or burned, so whoever holds them can withdraw that liquidity.
The owner has the authority to call updateMintRate and release, which can increase the total supply of tokens. This allows the owner to dilute the holdings of all existing token holders at their discretion, provided they stay within the 2% annual cap.
Implement a timelock on all minting-related functions to ensure that any changes to the token supply are transparent and subject to a delay before execution.
Unresolved
The owner can use the lockPool and unlockPool functions to toggle the transferability of tokens. This gives the owner the power to effectively freeze liquidity or restrict trading for specific pools, which could be used to prevent users from moving their assets.
Remove the ability for the owner to arbitrarily lock pools, or restrict this functionality to a decentralized governance vote to prevent potential abuse.
Unresolved
The ten largest holders own 100.0% of supply. Of that, 3.8% burned — not holders that can sell, so excluded from the concentration score. What remains: 16.1% in wallets, 80.1% in other contracts. The deployer/owner wallet itself holds 16.1%. 3,012 holders in total.
Watch the largest wallets that are not exchanges, pools or locks — those are the ones that can move the price.
Acknowledged
3,012 holders. Not listed by CoinGecko or any exchange GoPlus tracks. Nothing independent confirms who is behind this token, so every power its contract grants is scored at face value.
Match the contract address against the project's official channels before trading.
Acknowledged
Liquidity $51K (DexScreener, all pools). 24h trading volume $32K (DexScreener, all pools).
Size any position to the liquidity and daily volume shown — they set how much you can sell and at what price.
Acknowledged
A token issued by a project for use, governance or fundraising. Scored on its contract and market facts. The class itself adds no points; the contract and market facts decide the score. Basis: no class-specific evidence. Tokenomics — Supply: mintable with no on-chain cap found. Control: a ProxyAdmin contract. Code: not upgradeable (no proxy). Fees: no buy or sell tax. Market: $51K of DEX liquidity across 1 pools. Launch: under a day of market history.
Check the project's own documentation for what the token is used for; this report covers what the contract allows.
Acknowledged
The token's oldest DEX pool is less than a day old. Age is not part of the risk score — a new token is not a risky one by default — but a short history means fewer trades and holder changes behind the facts in this report.
Re-check ownership, liquidity and holder distribution as the token matures; those are the facts that move early.
Acknowledged
The DERC20 contract is a standard ERC-20 implementation with added governance, voting, and vesting capabilities. The protocol relies on a centralized owner to manage inflation rates and pool access. While the code follows standard OpenZeppelin patterns, the high level of administrative control over token supply and transferability presents a significant centralization risk to token holders.
The architecture leverages robust OpenZeppelin libraries for ERC-20 and governance features. Code security is high due to the use of well-audited standard implementations. 7.1 Architecture and 7.2 Code Security are well-implemented, though 7.3 Access Control relies heavily on a single owner address.
The economic model is controlled by the owner via 7.4 Economic and 7.5 Governance parameters. The owner can mint tokens up to a 2% annual cap, which impacts holder value. 7.6 External dependencies are minimal, but the owner's ability to pause pool transfers creates a potential liquidity risk.
The contract is not upgradeable, which eliminates 7.7 Upgrades risk. 7.8 Operations are handled through direct function calls by the owner. The lack of proxy patterns ensures immutability of the core logic.
To improve security, consider transitioning the ownership to a multi-signature wallet or a decentralized governance contract to mitigate the risks associated with a single point of failure.
Additionally, implementing a timelock for sensitive administrative actions like minting or pool locking would provide transparency and protection for token holders.
Free for any token on the record. It links to this page and always shows the current score and the date it was checked.
Score changes are recorded as dated snapshots — history is append-only and cannot be edited.
This token is brand new. Run a deeper AI-powered analysis of the contract code — free and instant.
Get Detailed Audit Is this your token? Publish your own audit on this page
